|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#71
| |||
| |||
| "Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:NxfLd.4841$Ix.4817@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net... > "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote in message > news:bYzKd.1672$IJ5.1321@newsfe3-win.ntli.net... > > > > "Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@mygat e.mailgate.org... > >> "OK then, consider this > >> > >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, > >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the > >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg > >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It > >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. > >> Discuss...10 pts > >> > > > > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the > > same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result > > of the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get > > hit by the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the > > floor which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead > > weight. > > Not so. The sudden impact with the rear of the van would stop it abruptly, > throwing the driver and any passengers through the windscreen. > > Lee No, no , no! 100kg of budgies hitting the back of the van would blow the doors off, killing the people in the car behind. Instant trifle. al > > |
|
#72
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:51:17 -0000, "minamoto" <minamoto@ntlworld.com> wrote: > >"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:NxfLd.4841$Ix.4817@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net... >> "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote in message >> news:bYzKd.1672$IJ5.1321@newsfe3-win.ntli.net... >> > >> > "Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@mygat e.mailgate.org... >> >> "OK then, consider this >> >> >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> >> Discuss...10 pts >> >> >> > >> > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >> > same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result >> > of the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get >> > hit by the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the >> > floor which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead >> > weight. >> >> Not so. The sudden impact with the rear of the van would stop it abruptly, >> throwing the driver and any passengers through the windscreen. >> >> Lee > >No, no , no! >100kg of budgies hitting the back of the van would blow the doors off, killing the people in the car behind. Instant trifle. >al >> >> "You were only supposed to blow the budgie doors off". David |
|
#73
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:51:17 -0000, "minamoto" <minamoto@ntlworld.com> wrote: > >"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:NxfLd.4841$Ix.4817@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net... >> "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote in message >> news:bYzKd.1672$IJ5.1321@newsfe3-win.ntli.net... >> > >> > "Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@mygat e.mailgate.org... >> >> "OK then, consider this >> >> >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> >> Discuss...10 pts >> >> >> > >> > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >> > same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result >> > of the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get >> > hit by the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the >> > floor which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead >> > weight. >> >> Not so. The sudden impact with the rear of the van would stop it abruptly, >> throwing the driver and any passengers through the windscreen. >> >> Lee > >No, no , no! >100kg of budgies hitting the back of the van would blow the doors off, killing the people in the car behind. Instant trifle. >al >> >> "You were only supposed to blow the budgie doors off". David |
|
#74
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:51:17 -0000, "minamoto" <minamoto@ntlworld.com> wrote: > >"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:NxfLd.4841$Ix.4817@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net... >> "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote in message >> news:bYzKd.1672$IJ5.1321@newsfe3-win.ntli.net... >> > >> > "Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@mygat e.mailgate.org... >> >> "OK then, consider this >> >> >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> >> Discuss...10 pts >> >> >> > >> > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >> > same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result >> > of the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get >> > hit by the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the >> > floor which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead >> > weight. >> >> Not so. The sudden impact with the rear of the van would stop it abruptly, >> throwing the driver and any passengers through the windscreen. >> >> Lee > >No, no , no! >100kg of budgies hitting the back of the van would blow the doors off, killing the people in the car behind. Instant trifle. >al >> >> "You were only supposed to blow the budgie doors off". David |
|
#75
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:51:17 -0000, "minamoto" <minamoto@ntlworld.com> wrote: > >"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:NxfLd.4841$Ix.4817@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net... >> "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote in message >> news:bYzKd.1672$IJ5.1321@newsfe3-win.ntli.net... >> > >> > "Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@mygat e.mailgate.org... >> >> "OK then, consider this >> >> >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> >> Discuss...10 pts >> >> >> > >> > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >> > same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result >> > of the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get >> > hit by the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the >> > floor which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead >> > weight. >> >> Not so. The sudden impact with the rear of the van would stop it abruptly, >> throwing the driver and any passengers through the windscreen. >> >> Lee > >No, no , no! >100kg of budgies hitting the back of the van would blow the doors off, killing the people in the car behind. Instant trifle. >al >> >> "You were only supposed to blow the budgie doors off". David |
|
#76
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:51:17 -0000, "minamoto" <minamoto@ntlworld.com> wrote: > >"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:NxfLd.4841$Ix.4817@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net... >> "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote in message >> news:bYzKd.1672$IJ5.1321@newsfe3-win.ntli.net... >> > >> > "Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@mygat e.mailgate.org... >> >> "OK then, consider this >> >> >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> >> Discuss...10 pts >> >> >> > >> > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >> > same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result >> > of the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get >> > hit by the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the >> > floor which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead >> > weight. >> >> Not so. The sudden impact with the rear of the van would stop it abruptly, >> throwing the driver and any passengers through the windscreen. >> >> Lee > >No, no , no! >100kg of budgies hitting the back of the van would blow the doors off, killing the people in the car behind. Instant trifle. >al >> >> "You were only supposed to blow the budgie doors off". David |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 10:39 AM |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 10:39 AM |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 10:39 AM |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 10:39 AM |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 10:39 AM |