|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
| |||
| |||
| > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer to rays. The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." Lee |
|
#42
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. > > You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer > to rays. > > The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." > > Lee Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. gc |
|
#43
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. > > You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer > to rays. > > The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." > > Lee Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. gc |
|
#44
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. > > You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer > to rays. > > The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." > > Lee Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. gc |
|
#45
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. > > You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer > to rays. > > The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." > > Lee Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. gc |
|
#46
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. > > You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer > to rays. > > The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." > > Lee Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. gc |
|
#47
| |||
| |||
| George Cathcart <george.cathcart@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. >> >> You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer >> to rays. >> >> The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." >> >> Lee > >Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be >rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. > I knew they were cartilaginous like sharks, but I really guessed shark based on the fact that you didn't limit it to rays and skates but added the sharks in there. |
|
#48
| |||
| |||
| George Cathcart <george.cathcart@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. >> >> You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer >> to rays. >> >> The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." >> >> Lee > >Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be >rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. > I knew they were cartilaginous like sharks, but I really guessed shark based on the fact that you didn't limit it to rays and skates but added the sharks in there. |
|
#49
| |||
| |||
| George Cathcart <george.cathcart@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. >> >> You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer >> to rays. >> >> The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." >> >> Lee > >Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be >rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. > I knew they were cartilaginous like sharks, but I really guessed shark based on the fact that you didn't limit it to rays and skates but added the sharks in there. |
|
#50
| |||
| |||
| George Cathcart <george.cathcart@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mar 24, 1:50 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> > Without looking it up, I'd guess shark. >> >> You should have looked it up. While they're related to both, they're closer >> to rays. >> >> The best answer to what kind of animal a sawfish is, is "fish." >> >> Lee > >Lee's right. Several elasmobranch experts I know consider them to be >rays, period, but nature is always more complex than that. > I knew they were cartilaginous like sharks, but I really guessed shark based on the fact that you didn't limit it to rays and skates but added the sharks in there. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| stingray | www.ttdown.com | (Dutch) | 1 | 04-12-2007 04:40 PM |
| Trauma C5 | Graziano | (Italian) | 8 | 04-11-2007 03:44 PM |
| Huge iceberg collision imminent | Adam Helberg | Vacation ideas | 0 | 03-26-2007 11:24 PM |
| Re: <OTNews> Woman Uses Breast Milk To Put Out Burning Amputee Set On Fire By Teens | T.U.T. v 5.0 | Oman | 0 | 03-26-2007 07:24 PM |
| Huge iceberg collision imminent | Adam Helberg | Divers Hangout | 0 | 03-26-2007 12:47 PM |