Borneo vs. Palau

"Reef Fish" wrote

> Indeed. The named gang . . .

Ahhh, it's not a group of individuals, all of whom find Bob to be obnoxious,
it's another conspiracy against him. It's a wonder how many conspiracies
there are in the newsgroups and how Bob always seems to be the victim.
Scuba-L, Scuba SE, rec.scuba, rec.scuba.equipment, rec.scuba.locations,
everywhere you look, another conspiracy against Bob.

Lee

"Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:5fOOf.2043$l7.675@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
> "Reef Fish" wrote
>
> > Indeed. The named gang . . .
>
> Ahhh, it's not a group of individuals, all of whom find Bob to be
obnoxious,
> it's another conspiracy against him. It's a wonder how many conspiracies
> there are in the newsgroups and how Bob always seems to be the victim.
> Scuba-L, Scuba SE, rec.scuba, rec.scuba.equipment, rec.scuba.locations,
> everywhere you look, another conspiracy against Bob.
>
> Lee

All you conspirators should quit picking on poor Bob.

"Reef Fish" wrote

> That covered Scuba-L from 1988 until May 2000, the incident
> Lee dug up below, the consipiracy between Hugh Hunzinger and
> Nick Simicich to have CENSORSHIP on me, in May 2002 while
> I was diving in Cozumel.

So, you admit that your statement that there was no conspiracy is a lie?

> Mine had been busy kicking your ass, Lee, every time you had to dig
> deep into some OTHER group to lie, obfuscate, and distort.

It's not my lie that's being discussed here. It's yours and it's not an old
lie, it's a brand new one.

Lee

Lee Bell wrote:
> "Reef Fish" wrote
>
> > That covered Scuba-L from 1988 until May 2000, the incident
> > Lee dug up below, the consipiracy between Hugh Hunzinger and
> > Nick Simicich to have CENSORSHIP on me, in May 2002 while
> > I was diving in Cozumel.
>
> So, you admit that your statement that there was no conspiracy is a lie?

Lee, that's the kind of statement used ONLY by clueless newbies
in rec.scuba in ARGUING. It was your failed conspiracy, if you
want to insist on that NIT.

That was what sent the ENTIRE group of Scuba-L (except a handful)
to Scuba-SE, in protest. That was the HISTORY of Scuba-L's
downfall in 2000 everyone knew about -- that Lee has to stoop
so low to NIT PICK my statement.

If you want to find out first hand the DEATH of Scuba-L, read HERE:

http://raven.utc.edu/cgi-bin/WA.EXE?...005&L=scuba-se

Notice in particular the dates May 24 and May 25 of 2000. Lee was
wagging his tail that was tugged behind his legs and followed the
REST of the group.


> > Mine had been busy kicking your ass, Lee, every time you had to dig
> > deep into some OTHER group to lie, obfuscate, and distort.
>
> It's not my lie that's being discussed here. It's yours and it's not an old
> lie, it's a brand new one.
>
> Lee

Well, it really takes a SUPER MORON -- nah, making that an IDIOT,
to call that a lie. Your kindergarten sandbox rhetoric doesn't even
fool the first graders in rec.scuba!

-- Bob.

"Reef Fish" wrote

>> So, you admit that your statement that there was no conspiracy is a lie?
>
> Lee, that's the kind of statement used ONLY by clueless newbies
> in rec.scuba in ARGUING. It was your failed conspiracy, if you
> want to insist on that NIT.

Not my conspiracy. You claimed people in Scuba L were ganging up agaisnt
you, claimed they were doing it in rec.scuba, claimed they were doing it an
Techdiver, claimed they were doing it in rec.scuba.locations and soon will
be doing it in Scuba SE. They were all conspiracies against you and, I
suppose, in your twisted mind, all organized by me. Now you say there were
no conspiracies. I wish you'd make up your mind which lie you like better
and stick with it.

Lee Bell wrote:
> "Reef Fish" wrote
>
> >> So, you admit that your statement that there was no conspiracy is a lie?
> >
> > Lee, that's the kind of statement used ONLY by clueless newbies
> > in rec.scuba in ARGUING. It was your failed conspiracy, if you
> > want to insist on that NIT.
>
> Not my conspiracy. You claimed people in Scuba L were ganging up agaisnt
> you,

Lee DING DONG Bell claimed it.

> claimed they were doing it in rec.scuba,

I don't even read rec.scuba.

> claimed they were doing it an Techdiver,

I don't even read Techdiver. Lee DING DONG Bell claimed it.

> claimed they were doing it in rec.scuba.locations

Your gang of Dysfunctional morons like yourself. All came from
rec.scuba. Any fool, even YOU, can see it.

> and soon will be doing it in Scuba SE.

Keep dreaming, DING DONG Bell. You have lost ALL credibility
there. I spoke up plenty there on my own behalf, You couldn't
even whimper there. Did anyone spoke up FOR Lee Bell's
stupid claims?

Look around Lee. Even your Dysfunctional gang in rec.scuba.location
has abandoned you, to their credit, because even they could see
through your silly kindergarten level of idiotic argument.

You have nowhere to run to anymore, Lee.

-- Bob.

In article <1141671408.876469.37660@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups. com>, Reef
Fish <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote:


€
€ Look around Lee. Even your Dysfunctional gang in rec.scuba.location
€ has abandoned you, to their credit,

It's to our credit that we're staying quiet and letting you make a fool
out of yourself, all by yourself. The only reason I'm chiming in now is
quickly dispel any notion that we're not on Lee's side. He doesn't need
our help (actually, a five year-old wouldn't need our help), but I'd
hate to let you think you'd finally won an argument.

because even they could see
€ through your silly kindergarten level of idiotic argument.
€


We see your level of infantile logic for what it is, and ignore it as a
complete and total waste of time.

€ You have nowhere to run to anymore, Lee.
€
€ -- Bob.
€

Lee Bell wrote:
> "Reef Fish" wrote:
>
>> There was NO conspiracy against me in Scuba-L or Scuba-SE, in spite
>> of your wishful thinking.
>
> On 8 Mar 2001 Reef Fish wrote:
>
> My statement was based on the well-known fact, confesses by Lee
> many times, that he had been asked to join the "underground
> conspiracy" in Scuba-L, and this was ONE of the very tangible
> evidence that Lee was involved in the conspiracy, regardless
> whether it was successful or not, in Lee's own words.
>
> So, I confessed that I was asked to join a conspiracy, making it certain
> that I was involved in one, but no conspiracy eer existed.
>
> Check.

is bob incapable of understanding what he reads,
without any semblance of logical ability,
or is he just in a rabid rant?

>
> My foot's doing fine. How's yours doing?
>
>

"Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:060320061329267698%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ...
> In article <1141671408.876469.37660@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups. com>, Reef
> Fish <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> ?
> ? Look around Lee. Even your Dysfunctional gang in rec.scuba.location
> ? has abandoned you, to their credit,
>
> It's to our credit that we're staying quiet and letting you make a fool
> out of yourself, all by yourself. The only reason I'm chiming in now is
> quickly dispel any notion that we're not on Lee's side. He doesn't need
> our help (actually, a five year-old wouldn't need our help), but I'd
> hate to let you think you'd finally won an argument.
>
> because even they could see
> ? through your silly kindergarten level of idiotic argument.
> ?
>
>
> We see your level of infantile logic for what it is, and ignore it as a
> complete and total waste of time.

:^)

In article <1141684634.389698.13800@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups. com>, Reef
Fish <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote:




€
€ I have plenty other things to do. They don't. This is THEIR LIFE.
€
€ > -- Bob.
€

Yet you immediately replied to my message, then twice to your own reply.