Borneo vs. Palau

"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141315975.733638.122950@p10g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...
>
> bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post:
>>
>> and a second point to chilly!
>>
>
> What piqued my interest to read Bob Crownfield's post in the
> most unlikely subject that he could possibly have anything scuba-
> related to say, since Bob Crownfield has NOT had anything
> scuba related to post in any forum since the beginning of this
>
> millennium
>
> and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a
> single dive during this millennium (because I have given him
> at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because
> he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site).
>
> Bob has specialized in making a nuisance of himself, in ALL
> of the scuba forums, since the mid 1990s.
>
> Bob Crownfield, of the 10s of thousands of newsgroups,
> couldn't you find one or two that are NOT scuba forums, to
> be your sandbox playground?
>
> Clearly, the SUBSTANCE of your posts has absolutely,
> positively, NOTHING to do with anything SCUBA related.
>
> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> that have to do with scuba locations!
>
> BTW, there is no need for you to edit a few words out of
> my post, completely out of context and void of context,
> just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making.

Did I miss it? Is there something about scuba locations in your post? Is
your post what you mean by NOISE making?

Lee

"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141315975.733638.122950@p10g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...
>
> bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post:
>>
>> and a second point to chilly!
>>
>
> What piqued my interest to read Bob Crownfield's post in the
> most unlikely subject that he could possibly have anything scuba-
> related to say, since Bob Crownfield has NOT had anything
> scuba related to post in any forum since the beginning of this
>
> millennium
>
> and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a
> single dive during this millennium (because I have given him
> at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because
> he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site).
>
> Bob has specialized in making a nuisance of himself, in ALL
> of the scuba forums, since the mid 1990s.
>
> Bob Crownfield, of the 10s of thousands of newsgroups,
> couldn't you find one or two that are NOT scuba forums, to
> be your sandbox playground?
>
> Clearly, the SUBSTANCE of your posts has absolutely,
> positively, NOTHING to do with anything SCUBA related.
>
> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> that have to do with scuba locations!
>
> BTW, there is no need for you to edit a few words out of
> my post, completely out of context and void of context,
> just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making.

Did I miss it? Is there something about scuba locations in your post? Is
your post what you mean by NOISE making?

Lee

Lee Bell wrote:
> "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1141315975.733638.122950@p10g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post:
> >>
> >> and a second point to chilly!
> >>
> >
> > What piqued my interest to read Bob Crownfield's post in the
> > most unlikely subject that he could possibly have anything scuba-
> > related to say, since Bob Crownfield has NOT had anything
> > scuba related to post in any forum since the beginning of this
> >
> > millennium
> >
> > and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a
> > single dive during this millennium (because I have given him
> > at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because
> > he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site).
> >
> > Bob has specialized in making a nuisance of himself, in ALL
> > of the scuba forums, since the mid 1990s.
> >
> > Bob Crownfield, of the 10s of thousands of newsgroups,
> > couldn't you find one or two that are NOT scuba forums, to
> > be your sandbox playground?
> >
> > Clearly, the SUBSTANCE of your posts has absolutely,
> > positively, NOTHING to do with anything SCUBA related.
> >
> > Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
> > rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> > that have to do with scuba locations!
> >
> > BTW, there is no need for you to edit a few words out of
> > my post, completely out of context and void of context,
> > just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making.
>
> Did I miss it? Is there something about scuba locations in your post? Is
> your post what you mean by NOISE making?
>
> Lee

Yes Lee. You missed the SUBSTANCE of my entire post, and
especially this paragraph:

RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
RF> that have to do with scuba locations!

Folks, there is a Festival ongoing right NOW, in Scuba-SE
(all you have to do is to subscribe to it via:

http://raven.utc.edu/archives/scuba-SE.html

in which Lee Bell appears to be the subject/star of SPANKING,
by members of that group, in the new thread which was carried
over from Lee Bell's patented Mouth Dancing in the "A day for
visitors thread":

Edukashun (Was: Re: A day for visitors)

and this is how Lee shot his own foot in the latest exhibit:

As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike,

Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do
Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching,
Lee> or hearing, about others that can.

RF> That pretty much is a TRUE CONFESSION of WHY Lee Bell is so
RF> ignorant about so many scuba facts, priniciples, and physical
RF> and scientific Laws!

Not to mention Lee's inexperience and ignorance about DIVE LOCATIONS
outside of Florida!

RF> A dive report or two by you Lee, is a good start, to get you
RF> away from your incessant ARGUING, on empty.

RF> But, you'll be the same old Lee Bell unless you can CHANGE
RF> your attitude and modus operadi, as evidence in your own words:

Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do
Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching,
Lee> or hearing, about others that can.

It'll do you MUCH GOOD if you'll watch, hear, and keep your
mouth SHUT for a change, Lee!

BTW, why are you HERE, posting your vacuous post of my post
about Bob Crownfield, while MY POST, excerpted above is
waiting for your response in Scuba-SE? ) So are other
posts to which you have NOT responded, such as:


On posting dive reports,

Lee> Remind me if I forget.

ML> You would not need reminding if you changed your modus operandi...
ML> rather than focussing on responses that argue with others why not
focus
ML> on posts that share your diving experiences???

ML> Then you would not need reminding as it would be common practice
to post
ML> about your diving experiences, thus making this place more
interesting
ML> and possibly more educational for others and yourself.

Those comments certainly apply to Lee Bell 100% in rec.scuba.locations
as well!

-- Bob.

Lee Bell wrote:
> "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1141315975.733638.122950@p10g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post:
> >>
> >> and a second point to chilly!
> >>
> >
> > What piqued my interest to read Bob Crownfield's post in the
> > most unlikely subject that he could possibly have anything scuba-
> > related to say, since Bob Crownfield has NOT had anything
> > scuba related to post in any forum since the beginning of this
> >
> > millennium
> >
> > and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a
> > single dive during this millennium (because I have given him
> > at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because
> > he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site).
> >
> > Bob has specialized in making a nuisance of himself, in ALL
> > of the scuba forums, since the mid 1990s.
> >
> > Bob Crownfield, of the 10s of thousands of newsgroups,
> > couldn't you find one or two that are NOT scuba forums, to
> > be your sandbox playground?
> >
> > Clearly, the SUBSTANCE of your posts has absolutely,
> > positively, NOTHING to do with anything SCUBA related.
> >
> > Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
> > rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> > that have to do with scuba locations!
> >
> > BTW, there is no need for you to edit a few words out of
> > my post, completely out of context and void of context,
> > just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making.
>
> Did I miss it? Is there something about scuba locations in your post? Is
> your post what you mean by NOISE making?
>
> Lee

Yes Lee. You missed the SUBSTANCE of my entire post, and
especially this paragraph:

RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
RF> that have to do with scuba locations!

Folks, there is a Festival ongoing right NOW, in Scuba-SE
(all you have to do is to subscribe to it via:

http://raven.utc.edu/archives/scuba-SE.html

in which Lee Bell appears to be the subject/star of SPANKING,
by members of that group, in the new thread which was carried
over from Lee Bell's patented Mouth Dancing in the "A day for
visitors thread":

Edukashun (Was: Re: A day for visitors)

and this is how Lee shot his own foot in the latest exhibit:

As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike,

Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do
Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching,
Lee> or hearing, about others that can.

RF> That pretty much is a TRUE CONFESSION of WHY Lee Bell is so
RF> ignorant about so many scuba facts, priniciples, and physical
RF> and scientific Laws!

Not to mention Lee's inexperience and ignorance about DIVE LOCATIONS
outside of Florida!

RF> A dive report or two by you Lee, is a good start, to get you
RF> away from your incessant ARGUING, on empty.

RF> But, you'll be the same old Lee Bell unless you can CHANGE
RF> your attitude and modus operadi, as evidence in your own words:

Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do
Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching,
Lee> or hearing, about others that can.

It'll do you MUCH GOOD if you'll watch, hear, and keep your
mouth SHUT for a change, Lee!

BTW, why are you HERE, posting your vacuous post of my post
about Bob Crownfield, while MY POST, excerpted above is
waiting for your response in Scuba-SE? ) So are other
posts to which you have NOT responded, such as:


On posting dive reports,

Lee> Remind me if I forget.

ML> You would not need reminding if you changed your modus operandi...
ML> rather than focussing on responses that argue with others why not
focus
ML> on posts that share your diving experiences???

ML> Then you would not need reminding as it would be common practice
to post
ML> about your diving experiences, thus making this place more
interesting
ML> and possibly more educational for others and yourself.

Those comments certainly apply to Lee Bell 100% in rec.scuba.locations
as well!

-- Bob.

>> Did I miss it? Is there something about scuba locations in your post?
>> Is
>> your post what you mean by NOISE making?

> Yes Lee. You missed the SUBSTANCE of my entire post, and
> especially this paragraph:

> RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
> RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> RF> that have to do with scuba locations!

Nothing relating to locations there. Sorry, but your entire post was
nothing more than another one of your attacks on someone else. That's known
as the Pot calling the Kettle black.

Yes, I know I'm doing the same thing, but I'm not the one complaining.

BTW you have not been appointed as the spokesperson for rec.scuba.locations

> As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike,

> Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do
> Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching,
> Lee> or hearing, about others that can.

I thought you were asked to leave Strike out of your rants in other forums.
Forget again, did you?

Lee

>> Did I miss it? Is there something about scuba locations in your post?
>> Is
>> your post what you mean by NOISE making?

> Yes Lee. You missed the SUBSTANCE of my entire post, and
> especially this paragraph:

> RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
> RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> RF> that have to do with scuba locations!

Nothing relating to locations there. Sorry, but your entire post was
nothing more than another one of your attacks on someone else. That's known
as the Pot calling the Kettle black.

Yes, I know I'm doing the same thing, but I'm not the one complaining.

BTW you have not been appointed as the spokesperson for rec.scuba.locations

> As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike,

> Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do
> Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching,
> Lee> or hearing, about others that can.

I thought you were asked to leave Strike out of your rants in other forums.
Forget again, did you?

Lee

Lee Bell wrote:
> >> Did I miss it?
>
> > Yes Lee. You missed the SUBSTANCE of my entire post, and
> > especially this paragraph:
>
> > RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
> > RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> > RF> that have to do with scuba locations!
>
> Nothing relating to locations there.

Really? I see "rec.scuba.locations" mentioned twice in the three
lines. Lee, your senseless rhetoric in ARGUING is getting to be
very very old.


> Yes, I know I'm doing the same thing, but I'm not the one complaining.

Then what you are doing NOW? Showing your skill in Mouth Dancing
with feet dangling from the mouth?

>
> BTW you have not been appointed as the spokesperson for rec.scuba.locations

You not only need lessons in scuba, you need lessons in English too,
very badly:

> > RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself

That was the first clause -- I was speaking for MYSELF.

And the second clause was:

> > RF> and all those folks in
> > RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> > RF> that have to do with scuba locations!

Lee Bell and Bob Crownfield are clearly NOT those folks I was
speaking for -- and I am quite sure that is not an empty set.


> > As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike,
>
> > Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do
> > Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching,
> > Lee> or hearing, about others that can.
>
> I thought you were asked to leave Strike out of your rants in other forums.

You are also very deficient in your recollection of FACTS and LOGIC:

1. I was quoting Lee Bell. Not quoting Strike.

2. Yes, Strike did ask (nicely) that I do not quote him in other
forums,
(relative to the thread here about Lee lying about my drinking)
and I respecfully DECLINED. So, even if I had quoted Strike this
round, it would have been within my perogative as Strike and I
had mutually agreed that we "march by our own drum beat".
My drum beat is that anything that appeared in a PUBLIC FORUM
is quotable, as long as it is correctly quoted, in the correct
context, and without any derogatory intent nor derogative
implication.

3. Strike and I each had a lengthy post in scuba-SE on this matter.
It was SETTLED. Fini. It does not need any of Lee Bell's
misrepresentation, lies, and obfuscation. In fact, if anyone
wants to read what Strike said (in a single post), and what I
said (also in a single response) can do so by reading those
two posts in scuba-SE, by simply subscribing to

http://raven.utc.edu/archives/scuba-SE.html

Lee, you are stripped completely naked, of your mindless rhetoric
and NOISE, with the help of your own big mouth:

> Forget again, did you?
>
> Lee

Hardly. And I pointed everyone to where they can read the FACTS
for themselves, not through Lee Bell's fantasy and faulty recollection.

-- Bob.

Lee Bell wrote:
> >> Did I miss it?
>
> > Yes Lee. You missed the SUBSTANCE of my entire post, and
> > especially this paragraph:
>
> > RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself, and all those folks in
> > RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> > RF> that have to do with scuba locations!
>
> Nothing relating to locations there.

Really? I see "rec.scuba.locations" mentioned twice in the three
lines. Lee, your senseless rhetoric in ARGUING is getting to be
very very old.


> Yes, I know I'm doing the same thing, but I'm not the one complaining.

Then what you are doing NOW? Showing your skill in Mouth Dancing
with feet dangling from the mouth?

>
> BTW you have not been appointed as the spokesperson for rec.scuba.locations

You not only need lessons in scuba, you need lessons in English too,
very badly:

> > RF> Just a plea, on behalf of myself

That was the first clause -- I was speaking for MYSELF.

And the second clause was:

> > RF> and all those folks in
> > RF> rec.scuba.locations who would rather discuss something
> > RF> that have to do with scuba locations!

Lee Bell and Bob Crownfield are clearly NOT those folks I was
speaking for -- and I am quite sure that is not an empty set.


> > As Lee put it so succinctly to Strike,
>
> > Lee> I've never been much of a spectator. If I can't do
> > Lee> it myself, I'm not particularly interested in watching,
> > Lee> or hearing, about others that can.
>
> I thought you were asked to leave Strike out of your rants in other forums.

You are also very deficient in your recollection of FACTS and LOGIC:

1. I was quoting Lee Bell. Not quoting Strike.

2. Yes, Strike did ask (nicely) that I do not quote him in other
forums,
(relative to the thread here about Lee lying about my drinking)
and I respecfully DECLINED. So, even if I had quoted Strike this
round, it would have been within my perogative as Strike and I
had mutually agreed that we "march by our own drum beat".
My drum beat is that anything that appeared in a PUBLIC FORUM
is quotable, as long as it is correctly quoted, in the correct
context, and without any derogatory intent nor derogative
implication.

3. Strike and I each had a lengthy post in scuba-SE on this matter.
It was SETTLED. Fini. It does not need any of Lee Bell's
misrepresentation, lies, and obfuscation. In fact, if anyone
wants to read what Strike said (in a single post), and what I
said (also in a single response) can do so by reading those
two posts in scuba-SE, by simply subscribing to

http://raven.utc.edu/archives/scuba-SE.html

Lee, you are stripped completely naked, of your mindless rhetoric
and NOISE, with the help of your own big mouth:

> Forget again, did you?
>
> Lee

Hardly. And I pointed everyone to where they can read the FACTS
for themselves, not through Lee Bell's fantasy and faulty recollection.

-- Bob.

Reef Fish wrote:
> bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post:

>> and a second point to chilly!

both well deserved.


> and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a
> single dive during this millennium (because I have given him
> at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because
> he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site).

and i would give a shit what you thought because...

>
> BTW, there is no need for you to edit a few words out of
> my post, completely out of context and void of context,
> just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making.

but, you poor silly senility,
they were your words,
and they captured the essential intellect of your tedious post.

>
> -- Bob.
>

Reef Fish wrote:
> bob crownfield wrote, in the entirety of his post:

>> and a second point to chilly!

both well deserved.


> and it is a virtue certainty that Bob Crownfield has not done a
> single dive during this millennium (because I have given him
> at least a dozen opportunity to say that I was WRONG, because
> he had done ONE dive, on such a such date, at some dive site).

and i would give a shit what you thought because...

>
> BTW, there is no need for you to edit a few words out of
> my post, completely out of context and void of context,
> just to display your modus operandi of NOISE making.

but, you poor silly senility,
they were your words,
and they captured the essential intellect of your tedious post.

>
> -- Bob.
>