|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
| |||
| |||
| "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:eRhFg.17673$0k4.3844@bignews1.bellsouth.net.. . > dechucka wrote > >> Having said that especially diving in Q'land has become a lot more strict >> since the 2 seppos ( sorry citizens of the USA ) were lost. You actually >> sign yourself back onto the boat but that is a gov regulation, I assume >> under Health and Safety laws > > I read the proposed Q'land diving rules after the two incidents in one > year, both by the same operator as I recall. They were pretty strict. I > was not pleased to see that kind of government controls imposed on the > sport anywhere and certainly not in such a popular dive destination. I've > not seen the rules actually adopted. Are they available on line somewhere > that does not require me to pay for them? Try here http://www.dir.qld.gov.au/workplace/subjects/diving//. ( I was put onto this by a mate, I haven't read it so don't know if this is what you want) As a diver the only thing I really noticed in Q'land was the signing on that you were back on board and that has been going on for quite a few years now. I assume that there is probably more paper work for the operators. I haven't been on live aboard for a few years now ( non diving wife and I like to spend holiday time with the kids ) so I don't know how the new regulations have effected them. ps had a couple of magic dives off Wollongong NSW first on the " Bombo " and second around 5 Islands ( Toothbrush Is ) so I am a happy bubble blower tonight |
|
#52
| |||
| |||
| On 17 Aug 2006 04:40:54 -0700, "-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > Feel free to ask Grumman how large of a set of brass ones it would take > to do this once. Then how much harder the brass has to be, to be > expected to do this repeatedly - ie, once per month. Well, since you asked ... On the order of sphincter tightening experiences that I've had... Landing at night without a landing light on a well lit airport is not that big of a deal after the first couple of times that it happens to you... Landing at night with a landing light, but without runway edge lights, but in a major metropolitan area airport where the ambient light reflected off the clouds provide quite a bit of secondary illumination -- quite a bit more sphincter tightening... Landing at night with a landing light, but without runway edge lights and at a remote rural unfamiliar airport with only some guy at the other end of the runway in a truck with his headlights on, but no major obstacles along the flight path -- somewhat sphincter tightening... Quite frankly, my landing light doesn't provide me with enough light to actually see the runway until I'm about ready to flare anyway... Even when you have one person marking the end of the runway with their truck and the headlights shining down the runway, it's difficult to get lined up on the runway... You know where the runway *ends*, but you don't know exactly where it starts... It is nice to know *both* points so that you can draw a line between them and figure that the runway runs along this line... Summary -- those little lights on the edge of the runway are really nice to have at night... |
|
#53
| |||
| |||
|
Lee Bell wrote: > I don't know about you, but I don't want that level of government > involvement in diving. Divers are not much of a risk to others. If they > screw up, chances are, they're the only one that dies as a result. The one > thing that is as sure as sunrise tomorrow, though, is that the government > will get involved if the industry does not self regulate as promised. > Letting PADI claim that certification only means training was given is not > self regulating as promised. > > > Thus I was PADI certified. I signed the form, filled it in truthfully, got > > my medical checkup, both as required by PADI . . . > > Does PADI require a medical checkup in the US these days or do they still > accept a checklist signed by the student? No checkup, Just a checlist- They even tell you explicitly so you do not mark any condition that if you mark one of them, then (oh no) you will have to go to the Dr... therefore is giving you the subtle clue about "not marking anything". I have noticed this in all of them I visited. In fact the instrictors become DM and even MSD inless than 5 years and I do not think they dive every week, and if they do is during the summer in the same lake, so how much experience is this?. > > No disrespect intended, but come back after a few hundred more dives and > revisit the issue of how comprehensive the training you received really was > and, when you do, remember that, right now, you've taken two courses more > than most certified divers ever do. > > Lee |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New nitrox standards explained | Divetheworld | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 03-26-2007 11:36 PM |
| Cylinder Test Standards | rads | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 2 | 03-26-2007 11:25 PM |
| PADI standards... | Douglas W \Popeye\ Frederick | Philippines | 15 | 03-26-2007 09:12 PM |
| Fiji Equipment Standards? | Jessie | Fiji | 8 | 11-17-2004 07:23 AM |
| Fiji Standards | Jessie | Gear | 6 | 11-05-2004 06:17 PM |