America Attacked in Saudi Arabia

In article <41B687C1.4CA9@cox.net>, Crownfield <Crownfield@cox.net> writes:

>/m begining to think we should bomb cincinatti.

Cincnatti is very REPUBLICAN, yes you should attack it!

In article <22807$41b67e25$ce504903$16950@allthenewsgroups.co m>, Joe English
<jenglish@wisperhome.com> writes:

>Ahganistan was the home to that Nasty Taliban, someone who would have
>been quite tolerant of you fishie. Then there were the AlQaeda training
>camps endorsed by the Taliban. They had to go!
>
>Iraq ignored the resolutions they agreed to in 1991. We now know why
>the UN would not endorse any more action, Koffi and his boys were
>stealing millions. If that had been Bush I dread to think what would
>have become of that.
>
>Surely, fishie, you know see the error in your ways.
>
>I could at least hope, I really can not beleive that any one person can

16 of 19 of those on the airplanes were from Saudi Arabia, Osama Bin Ladden is
Saudi Arabian, and the stupid US attacks everyone but those who attacked us!

"Fishbre396" <fishbre396@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
news:20041209001405.08080.00000321@mb-m05.aol.com...
> In article <22807$41b67e25$ce504903$16950@allthenewsgroups.co m>, Joe
English
> <jenglish@wisperhome.com> writes:
>
> >Ahganistan was the home to that Nasty Taliban, someone who would have
> >been quite tolerant of you fishie. Then there were the AlQaeda training
> >camps endorsed by the Taliban. They had to go!
> >
> >Iraq ignored the resolutions they agreed to in 1991. We now know why
> >the UN would not endorse any more action, Koffi and his boys were
> >stealing millions. If that had been Bush I dread to think what would
> >have become of that.
> >
> >Surely, fishie, you know see the error in your ways.
> >
> >I could at least hope, I really can not beleive that any one person can
>
> 16 of 19 of those on the airplanes were from Saudi Arabia, Osama Bin
Ladden is
> Saudi Arabian, and the stupid US attacks everyone but those who attacked
us!


Uhmmm...Fishie......one more time.....
The hijackers belonged to a terrorist group called Al Quaeda.
Al Quaeda was based in Afghanistan, receiving support from the Taliban
government.
This is why we attacked Afghanistan.

Bush, of course, gets criticized for not anticipating the threat from Al
Quaeda, and acting pre-emptively to stop the attacks.

Now, onto Iraq. We have what we thought was good information that Iraq was
trying to restart his WMD program.
We thought it was good info, the Brits thought it was good info, Clinton
thought it was good info, Dashle thought it was good info, etc.
Of course, we dont have weapons inspectors because Saddam kicked 'em out in
1998 or so.
Anyway, rather than wait until Iraq completes 'em, we figured to take 'em
out. Bush learned from history, you see.
(A quick review of the period 1934-1939 can easily show the consequences of
inattention/inaction).
Also, take a look at North Korea.

Dennis

Fishbre396 wrote:

> In article <41B687C1.4CA9@cox.net>, Crownfield <Crownfield@cox.net> writes:
>
>
>>/m begining to think we should bomb cincinatti.
>
>
> Cincnatti is very REPUBLICAN, yes you should attack it!


they would use 'smart bombs' the republicans would be safe, you would
need to worry.

Fishbre396 wrote:
>
> In article <41B687C1.4CA9@cox.net>, Crownfield <Crownfield@cox.net> writes:
>
> >/m begining to think we should bomb cincinatti.
>
> Cincnatti is very REPUBLICAN, yes you should attack it!

i meant cleveland, you maroon.

In article <532a$41b84f09$ce504905$2588@allthenewsgroups.com> , Joe English
<jenglish@wisperhome.com> writes:

>You will never understand. 9/11 was not about Iraq, Saudia Arabia, or
>Afghanistan. It was about Al Qaeda, and those that harbored Al Qaeda -
>that would be the Taliban. The invasion of Iraq was about a whole
>different set of issues. Including ignoring Iraq's conditions of
>surrender, and ignoring UN mandates ( as we now know why the UN had no
>intention of holding Iraq too.)
>
>

What you don't understand, is that there is NO SUCH THING as Al Qaeda, Bush
made it up!

Fishbre396 wrote:
>
> In article <532a$41b84f09$ce504905$2588@allthenewsgroups.com> , Joe English
> <jenglish@wisperhome.com> writes:
>
> >You will never understand. 9/11 was not about Iraq, Saudia Arabia, or
> >Afghanistan. It was about Al Qaeda, and those that harbored Al Qaeda -
> >that would be the Taliban. The invasion of Iraq was about a whole
> >different set of issues. Including ignoring Iraq's conditions of
> >surrender, and ignoring UN mandates ( as we now know why the UN had no
> >intention of holding Iraq too.)
> >
> >
>
> What you don't understand, is that there is NO SUCH THING as Al Qaeda, Bush
> made it up!

and the vacuum between your ears holds them on your head.

Fishbre396 wrote:

> In article <532a$41b84f09$ce504905$2588@allthenewsgroups.com> , Joe English
> <jenglish@wisperhome.com> writes:
>
>
>>You will never understand. 9/11 was not about Iraq, Saudia Arabia, or
>>Afghanistan. It was about Al Qaeda, and those that harbored Al Qaeda -
>>that would be the Taliban. The invasion of Iraq was about a whole
>>different set of issues. Including ignoring Iraq's conditions of
>>surrender, and ignoring UN mandates ( as we now know why the UN had no
>>intention of holding Iraq too.)
>>
>>
>
>
> What you don't understand, is that there is NO SUCH THING as Al Qaeda, Bush
> made it up!
>


How so? Did Bush make this up when he was president?

"Joe English" <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
news:1d60f$41bb34e9$ce504905$18680@allthenewsgroup s.com...
> Fishbre396 wrote:
>
> > In article <532a$41b84f09$ce504905$2588@allthenewsgroups.com> , Joe
English
> > <jenglish@wisperhome.com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>You will never understand. 9/11 was not about Iraq, Saudia Arabia, or
> >>Afghanistan. It was about Al Qaeda, and those that harbored Al Qaeda -
> >>that would be the Taliban. The invasion of Iraq was about a whole
> >>different set of issues. Including ignoring Iraq's conditions of
> >>surrender, and ignoring UN mandates ( as we now know why the UN had no
> >>intention of holding Iraq too.)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > What you don't understand, is that there is NO SUCH THING as Al Qaeda,
Bush
> > made it up!
> >
>
>
> How so? Did Bush make this up when he was president?
>

Oh no, it was way before then. I may have even been before he became
governor of Texas. He's been feeding false information to the CIA for quite
some time now.

In article <HNZvd.45836$Al3.20554@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> , "Chris Guynn"
<chris.guynn@gmail.com> writes:

>Oh no, it was way before then. I may have even been before he became
>governor of Texas. He's been feeding false information to the CIA for quite
>some time now.

His father's friends are those who are members of the dreaded "Al Queda"
Remember, the Carlyle group funded Bin Ladin and many others who are members of
this "made up" group of enemy. It may be called "hey, send these guys a lot of
money to make GWB look good!!!" Throwing hundred dollar bills at hands in the
air!