scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Regional Travel and Dive News > Europe > Switzerland
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2007, 10:55 PM
Reef Fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hugh Huntzinger always tried to NAME SMEAR, but will NEVER succeed

For those short on ATTENTION SPAN, skip to the last TWO paragraphs
of this post on HOW to search for ANY topic, in scuba, statistics,
probability, air and cruise travel, and what Reef Fish Bob had posted
in over 60 different newsgroups.


For years, in citing my posts about SCUBA, which is always posted
with the posting name of "Reef Fish", (and I am the ONLY Reef Fish
in all newsgroups since 1992), Hugh Huntzinger the self-acknowledged
(since 1996)"Permanent Grudge Holder" on me always try to link my
scuba posts to my PROFESSIONAL name which has absolutely
NOTHING to do with my scuba postings, in his attempt to SMEAR
my name in my statistical profession.

Hugh send so far as digging up a Student Newspaper article of
10 years old in which I was interviewed by the student reporter about
students' abuse in "rating professors" thinking that would SMEAR my
name -- unfortnately for Hugh, that was my BEST source I could
have used to defend against Hugh's intended SMEAR, because that
article was both FAIR and ACCURATE, and it explained WHY I was
interviewed and what the abuses were.

But above all, Hugh made the GROSS BLUNDER that my professional
name is NOT "Bob Ling", but is "RF Ling" whose RF stand for both
the initials of my profession name AS WELL AS "Reef Fish" from
which the latter name and acronym was derived in 1992.


Hugh Huntzinger continued to use his MISattribution of Reef Fish
posts to Bob Ling, because Bob Ling is NOT the posting name of
anyone of my posts, but Reef Fish is, and is unmistable -- that being
the ONLY person (whom everyone already knew has the name
Bob and last name Ling) who posts in newsgroups by the name
"Reef Fish".

It was such an attempt of NAME SMEARING (Actually Hugh copied
that from Ron Lee who stopped doing it) and since the use of
"Bob Ling" in rec.scuba references are ALWAYS affiliated with
FLAMES, several other flamers in OTHER newsgroups began to
copy that practice, thinking they had unearthed some hidden
dark secret of the Reef Fish.

The Village Idiots in rec.games.bridge tried it. The FALSE abuse
reporter Dick Goldhaber copied Hugh's misattribution.


Here's the latest. I STARTED posting in several newsgroups
in 2005 that are populated by PROFESSIONAL statisticians, as
well as many clueless newbies who ask questions.

The most prolific poster of the sci.stat.math group (since 1995)
turned out to be the most IGNORANT one about statistics, but
he tried to teach others (of his Quackery and MALPRACTICE)
-- that of course is no different in scuba groups -- that one of
the most ignorant one about scuba physics and scuba locations,
Lee Bell, is always among the first ones to gave others FALSE
information.

At any rate, Richard Ulrich soon found Ron Lee's and Hugh
Hunzinger's posts about Bob Ling, and used it to try to
discredit me in the STATISTICS group, because he couldn't
defend his own quackery and malpractice.

Here is the LATEST episode, in which I showed that in using
his recommended Google-Scholar search (which is completely
USELESS and WORTHLESS) to promote one of the quacks
he knew, the count of citations in Google-Scholar in various
topics related to "multiple regression" (one of the most
commonly used topics in statistics) that my counts were HIGHER
than one of the all-time GIANTS in the statistics profession,
Fred Mostaller, and higher than many of those under John Tukey
(founder of Data Analysis) and there's no statistician in the
WORLD who don't know these two statistical GIANTS.

Relative to the professional citations, the Google-Scholar
under-counted by a factor of at least 100 for Tukey and
Mosteller, and a factor of 10 to 50 for my own publications!

But of course that was the counts for "RF Ling".

For "Bob Ling" the counts were ALL ZERO because I have never
written any paper under the name Bob Ling, just as I had never
posted under the name Bob Ling.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...58534adc558b99

In the post above, I gave the reasons I had given many times before

RF: On the other hand, if anyone wishes to search for KEYWORDS
RF:of what I have posted in these newsgroups, all one has to do is
RF: to go to the "advanced groups search" option of Groups Google,
RF: and search for the keywards and author "Reef Fish", with or
RF: without the quotes, and one would find what I had posted with
RF: the keywards under all the different posting IDs of Reef Fish.

RF: THAT is by far the most important reason I use the posting name
RF: of Reef Fish which I have used since 1992, because even though
RF: my posting IDs (email addresses) had changed many times, the
RF: same author "Reef Fish" would find ALL of them.

The last paragraph applies to ALL TOPICS under ALL newsgroups
that have been posted by Reef Fish, under at least half a dozen
different posting IDs (email addresses).

So, Hugh, you Permanent Grudge Holder with the intention to SMEAR
Reef Fish's professional name by posting

hh: Bob Ling "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Gr0u...@yahoo.com> wrote:

you can learn some netiquette and leave out the MISLEADING and
superfluous "Bob Ling" in your attribution in replying to my posts.

The professional name of "RF Ling" is UNSMEARABLE!

There are only TWO flamers left in the sci.stat.math group in which
I am the TOP poster, and they are BOTH malpracticing Quacks
who had lost ALL of their credibility.


Descripción: Statistics from a strictly mathematical viewpoint.
Categorías: Ciencia y tecnología
Usenet: sci.stat

2006 904 711 744 1219 1180 862 1092

(posts in July 2006)
Autor con más mensajes del mes
153 Reef Fish
126 lic...@hotmail.com
68 jtom...@ix.netcom.com
32 rich.ulr...@comcast.net
31 John Uebersax
23 hru...@odds.stat.purdue.edu
23 sjhersc...@netscape.net
21 illywhacker
21 Ray Koopman
21 Reef Fish

(All Time Top Posters)
Autores que históricamente han enviado más mensajes
1574 Reef Fish
1192 wpi...@pitt.edu (Quack No. 1)
1121 lic...@hotmail.com (Quack No. 2)


Hugh Hunzinger and everyone else:

If you want to learn something about SCUBA (locations, theory or
practice),
go to advanced search in Google Groups and specify KEYWORDS and
author REEF FISH.

If you want to learn something about STATISTICS (lheory or methods),
go to advanced search in Google Groups and specify KEYWORDS and
author REEF FISH.

-- Reef Fish Bob.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hugh Huntzinger the plagiariser, name-smearer, ... EXPOSED Reef Fish Vacation ideas 1 03-26-2007 10:30 PM
Bjorn on Hugh Huntzinger and rec.scuba Reef Fish Divers Hangout 26 03-26-2007 09:58 PM
For Hugh pugetsounddiver@gmail.com Divers Hangout 0 03-26-2007 08:17 PM
Re: Militant chosen to succeed al-Zarqawi Scott Divers Hangout 0 03-26-2007 08:12 PM
Hugh Huntzinger the plagiariser, name-smearer, ... EXPOSED Reef Fish Divers Hangout 1 03-26-2007 06:16 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 AM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.