Re: George Bush Will be "Outed" and Dissed by Kitty Kelley on September 14

>From: John R. Macdonald scubajohn@remove.claranet.fr
>Date: 9/7/2004 9:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <abpsj09cd8llv7v00fol38br67hlhfd4a5@4ax.com>
>
>On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 18:41:57 -0700, "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@mail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>snip
>>
>>Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have slandered
>>yourselves, in thought, word, and deed.
>>
>What can you tell us about Watergate Scott?

That he wa pre-teen at the time?


Popeye
"If one does as God does enough times, one
will become as God is." -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

"Popeye NCAT3" <buzcutt454@aol.comByteMe> wrote in message
news:20040908081752.03319.00000253@mb-m25.aol.com...
> >From: John R. Macdonald scubajohn@remove.claranet.fr
> >Date: 9/7/2004 9:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time
> >Message-id: <abpsj09cd8llv7v00fol38br67hlhfd4a5@4ax.com>
> >
> >On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 18:41:57 -0700, "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@mail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >snip
> >>
> >>Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have
slandered
> >>yourselves, in thought, word, and deed.
> >>
> >What can you tell us about Watergate Scott?

That it is none of your fucking business?

> That he wa pre-teen at the time?

I remember it very well, however, as it was in the news, and my father was
pissed off about the whole thing. He always hated Nixon passionately.

And as I recall, several people went to jail over it, and the rest involved
had their careers ended.

John R. Macdonald wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 18:41:57 -0700, "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@mail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> snip
>
>>Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have slandered
>>yourselves, in thought, word, and deed.
>>
>
> What can you tell us about Watergate Scott?
>
> snip
>

Old news - Nixon was a scumbag, next.

But heard, half-heard in the stillness, Scott writes --

> Nixon and his bunch were cocksuckers.

O'Neill of the SBV is one of Nixon's bunch.

--
"If any question why we died
Tell them, because our fathers lied."
- Kipling (after his son was killed in WWI)

On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:48:08 -0500, "Dennis \(Icarus\)"
<nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:

>"John R. Macdonald" <scubajohn@remove.claranet.fr> wrote in message
>news:abpsj09cd8llv7v00fol38br67hlhfd4a5@4ax.com.. .
>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 18:41:57 -0700, "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@mail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> snip
>> >
>> >Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have slandered
>> >yourselves, in thought, word, and deed.
>> >
>> What can you tell us about Watergate Scott?
>
>That it was over 30 years ago?
>
>Dennis
>
>>
>> snip
>>
>
>
And involved Republican dirty tricks ...

>From: "Scott" pugetsounddiver@mail.com

>
>> That he was pre-teen at the time?
>
>I remember it very well, however, as it was in the news, and my father was
>pissed off about the whole thing. He always hated Nixon passionately.
>
>And as I recall, several people went to jail over it, and the rest involved
>had their careers ended.

Like Clinton and his cohorts.

Oh, wait...


Popeye
"If one does as God does enough times, one
will become as God is." -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

In article <veKdnepaMp4ua6PcRVn-vg@accessus.net>, Joe English
<jenglish@accessusn.net> writes:

>Old news - Nixon was a scumbag, next.

Bush isn't any different!

"John R. Macdonald" <scubajohn@remove.claranet.fr> wrote in message
news:1h8vj0lrpvn3hkq16onf6hdf68u715lgis@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:48:08 -0500, "Dennis \(Icarus\)"
> <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:
>
> >"John R. Macdonald" <scubajohn@remove.claranet.fr> wrote in message
> >news:abpsj09cd8llv7v00fol38br67hlhfd4a5@4ax.com.. .
> >> On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 18:41:57 -0700, "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@mail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> snip
> >> >
> >> >Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have
slandered
> >> >yourselves, in thought, word, and deed.
> >> >
> >> What can you tell us about Watergate Scott?
> >
> >That it was over 30 years ago?
> >
> >Dennis
> >
> >>
> >> snip
> >>
> >
> >
> And involved Republican dirty tricks ...
>
whichj were unnecessary, yes?

More to the point, Reagan showed that we didn't need dirty tricks, or
slander. Just a healthy optimism.
Consider also how Republicans won the house in 1994 - a strong positive
agenda.

Dennis

In article <WBO%c.45632$5s3.11301@fe40.usenetserver.com>, Icarus\
<nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:

€ "John R. Macdonald" <scubajohn@remove.claranet.fr> wrote in message
€ news:1h8vj0lrpvn3hkq16onf6hdf68u715lgis@4ax.com...
€ > On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:48:08 -0500, "Dennis \(Icarus\)"
€ > <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:
€ >

€ > >> >Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have
€ slandered
€ > >> >yourselves, in thought, word, and deed.
€ > >> >
€ > >> What can you tell us about Watergate Scott?
€ > >
€ > >That it was over 30 years ago?
€ > >
€ > >Dennis
€ > >
€ > >>
€ > >> snip
€ > >>
€ > >
€ > >
€ > And involved Republican dirty tricks ...
€ >
€ whichj were unnecessary, yes?
€
€ More to the point, Reagan showed that we didn't need dirty tricks, or
€ slander. Just a healthy optimism.
€ Consider also how Republicans won the house in 1994 - a strong positive
€ agenda.
€


Yep, followed by a tranformation into a firebreathing conservative
agenda. Ask Newt Gingrich how well that went over with the voters in
his district.

In article <42Q%c.45643$5s3.10181@fe40.usenetserver.com>, Icarus\
<nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:

€ > ? >
€ >
€ > ? > >> >Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have
€ > ? slandered
€ > ? > >> >yourselves, in thought, word, and deed.
€ > ? > >> >
€ > ? > >> What can you tell us about Watergate Scott?
€ > ? > >
€ > ? > >That it was over 30 years ago?
€ > ? > >
€ > ? > >Dennis
€ > ? > >
€ > ? > >>
€ > ? > >> snip
€ > ? > >>
€ > ? > >
€ > ? > >
€ > ? > And involved Republican dirty tricks ...
€ > ? >
€ > ? whichj were unnecessary, yes?
€ > ?
€ > ? More to the point, Reagan showed that we didn't need dirty tricks, or
€ > ? slander. Just a healthy optimism.
€ > ? Consider also how Republicans won the house in 1994 - a strong positive
€ > ? agenda.
€ > ?
€ >
€ >
€ > Yep, followed by a tranformation into a firebreathing conservative
€ > agenda. Ask Newt Gingrich how well that went over with the voters in
€ > his district.
€
€ Evidently pretty well, since he did win re-election by 70.70% of the vote -
€ 164,966 to 68,366
€ http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe1998/gah.htm
€
€ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich
€
€ After the 1998 election campaign, in which the Republicans expected big
€ gains but ultimately showed the poorest results in 34 years of any party not
€ in control of the White House, Gingrich resigned from the speakership and
€ from his seat in November 1998.
€
€
€ And its likely that the impeachment took a heavier toll than a repudiation
€ of "the firebreathing conservative agenda".
€
€ http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/.../election.html
€
€

But wasn't the former simply a way of acting out the latter?