|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
| |||
| |||
| "Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message news:080920042108086960%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ... > In article <42Q%c.45643$5s3.10181@fe40.usenetserver.com>, Icarus\ > <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote: > > ? > ? > > ? > > ? > ? > >> >Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have > ? > ? slandered > ? > ? > >> >yourselves, in thought, word, and deed. > ? > ? > >> > > ? > ? > >> What can you tell us about Watergate Scott? > ? > ? > > > ? > ? > >That it was over 30 years ago? > ? > ? > > > ? > ? > >Dennis > ? > ? > > > ? > ? > >> > ? > ? > >> snip > ? > ? > >> > ? > ? > > > ? > ? > > > ? > ? > And involved Republican dirty tricks ... > ? > ? > > ? > ? whichj were unnecessary, yes? > ? > ? > ? > ? More to the point, Reagan showed that we didn't need dirty tricks, or > ? > ? slander. Just a healthy optimism. > ? > ? Consider also how Republicans won the house in 1994 - a strong positive > ? > ? agenda. > ? > ? > ? > > ? > > ? > Yep, followed by a tranformation into a firebreathing conservative > ? > agenda. Ask Newt Gingrich how well that went over with the voters in > ? > his district. > ? > ? Evidently pretty well, since he did win re-election by 70.70% of the vote - > ? 164,966 to 68,366 > ? http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe1998/gah.htm > ? > ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich > ? > ? After the 1998 election campaign, in which the Republicans expected big > ? gains but ultimately showed the poorest results in 34 years of any party not > ? in control of the White House, Gingrich resigned from the speakership and > ? from his seat in November 1998. > ? > ? > ? And its likely that the impeachment took a heavier toll than a repudiation > ? of "the firebreathing conservative agenda". > ? > ? http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/.../election.html > ? > ? > > But wasn't the former simply a way of acting out the latter? Nah. Dennis |
|
#52
| |||
| |||
| Fishbre396 wrote: > > In article <veKdnepaMp4ua6PcRVn-vg@accessus.net>, Joe English > <jenglish@accessusn.net> writes: > > >Old news - Nixon was a scumbag, next. > > Bush isn't any different! and you the outed child molester, does that make you a scumbag too? |
|
#53
| |||
| |||
| Very Eloquent and Spot on Target CENTER of MASS "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@mail.com> wrote in message news:10jq4elh6656k30@corp.supernews.com... > > "Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message > news:060920041757025505%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ... > >> The republicans don't have a monopoly on "mindless" > > Sure dont. Who threw fucking *BAGS OF PISS* on people over the RNC > convention? > > How many protestors did you see getting hauled out of the DNC convention, > face down and feet first? > > At the RNC convention? > > You people are out of control, and your rhetoric doesnt float any more. > > YOu lie in the press, you lie in the streets, you lie right here on this > SCUBA newsgroup. > > And then you bitch about Bush lying, which the 9/11 panel exhonerated him > for. > > You refuse to look at the simple facts and the voting history of your > party, > and its chosen representative for the Presidency of the US. > > Republicans dont need dirty tricks or slander, you fuckers have slandered > yourselves, in thought, word, and deed. > >> But yes, many people mindlessly follow the leaders that tell them what >> they've been wanting to hear. How do you think Hitler managed to gain >> power? > > First off, I would have to say that liberals are the keepers of that > dogma. > You *mindlessly* support Kerry, simply because he isn't Bush! > > And you do that because Bush is a republican! > > Meanwhile, you turn a blind eye to Kerry's 19 impotent fucking years in > senate, and his voting record there, not to mention his attendance. > > You all couldn't have chosen a bigger stinker if you tried. > > Kerry doesn't give a fuck about you, the democrat party, me or anyone > else. > He cares about being able to say he was POTUS. > > Speaking for myself, I am not of the attitude I am because of anything > Bush > or Clinton said or told me or anyone else to do. > > I am sick of watching innocents, or military sent to help, murdered, > slaughtered, beheaded so that some shitbag can get his trip to heavens > whorehouse. > > Why did We get into GWI? Who did we help? Muslims. > > Why did We get involved in Kosovo? Who did we help? Muslims. > > Why did We get involved in Somalia? Who did we help? Muslims. > > Who is being slaughtered now in Sudan, and by whom? The slaughter is being > carried out by Muslims. > > Who fills the mass graves in Iraq? Muslims. Who filled those graves? > Saddam. > And you want to liken Bush to Hitler? > > What the fuck are you on? > > Who slaughtered school kids in Russia? Muslims. > > Who slaughtered Americans and anyone near them in Nairobi, Kenya and New > York City (twice)? Muslims. > > Who kills any chance of a peace in Israel and the center of all religion? > Muslims. > > They all want to go to paradise dying fighting infidels? > > FAR FUCKING OUT! > > You want to extend them courtesy and tolerance they will *never* extend > you. > Or your precious family. Or mine, and I'll be damned if I am going to > stand > idly by while you acquiesce to their murderous intentions! > > Do you know any Marines? > > Following orders, at peril of family, and at *actual* risk of serious > bodily > harm or death, is what Marines do. > > FOR ANYONE to use the deaths in Iraq of Marines as political currency is > lower than whale shit. > > You don't speak for them (they volunteered), you don't speak for their > families, their fellow Marines, and neither does Mossman. > > You two are so far from anything resembling a logical or moral line of > thought as to be indefinable. > > And in case you haven't been able to pick up on it, you fuckers piss me > off. > > You want to revamp health care? > > How about we limit the money an attorney can make on a malpractice > settlement? > > Fine, give the alleged victim a settlement, but there is no reason on > earth > why an attorney should make *millions* off someone else's suffering. > > Attorneys run the insurance companies, write the policies, and argue in > court the failures of licensed (by the Bar) medical practitioners, and > soak > the money out of *people* on both sides of the fence, then go have lunch > and > golf together. Doesn't anything about this stink to you? > > Why is a fucking attorney worth $250 to $5,000 dollars an hour? > > How much do you make an hour? > > Get a grip Alan. > > The fight and war being waged isn't for Bush, Halliburton or any other > bullshit. > > It is being waged for the freedom of choice that you, I and Mossman enjoy, > being Americans. > > A freedom that isn't free, and never has been. > > Americans that Islam wants to destroy. > > You go ahead and make excuses for them, redirect the blame for what they > do > onto a political entity you don't approve of, meanwhile, you not only > support, but invigorate their effort. > > More families will weep. > > You don't know, because it hasn't touched *your* family, yet. > > And, if the Marines have their way, it never will. > > *THAT* is the sacrifice you belittle and shit on every time you try to > make > Bush out the criminal. > > > > > |
|
#54
| |||
| |||
| "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message news:413d7fc6$0$105$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com... <hack> You cant honestly address or answer a single point without twisting like a flag in the wind, or without putting your bullshit words in my mouth, or calling me a racist or some other of your ramped up emotional rhetoric. Your tactics, and those of your party, are recognized widely now. You're losing it. So is Kerry. So is your party. All your rabid lies and attacks have been discounted, one by one, and you all have been outed for what you are. Liars. Desperate liars propped up by forged documents, criminal conspiracies, refusal to look at evidence that *proves* Bush was *not* AWOL, and false charges repeated like some twisted mantra: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberal...20040909.asp#1 http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb20040910.asp http://washingtontimes.com/national/...4215-9844r.htm Bush released all his records, Kerry hasnt. PERIOD. The Navy is looking into Kerry's medals and the facts will be on the table, probably not until after the election, but that wont matter; Kerry has done exactly what he did in Vietnam, and wounded himself, only this time its going to hurt. Oh, and the murders in New York? Evidence of the success of impotent gun control legislation. New York has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the Nation. Completely innefective. Lawyers like you grow rich off the war on drugs, fill our prisons with people who have a horrible health and social problem, and then make excuses for rapists, murderers, etc. The "assault weapons" ban is done. Because of the will of the majority of the people of the US. Because your lies and those of VPC, the Brady Bunch, Schumer, Feinstein, the liberal controlled media, and your boy Kerry didnt/dont/wont fly any more. It didnt do anything but make the market for AR15's and AK47's grow exponentially. The sun is setting on the way you liberal socialists do business. You can only lie to people, and treat them as intellectual inferiors, for just so long before they figure out who is what. And you know what else? NO ONE ASKED YOU FUCKERS TO RUN OUR LIVES FOR US! Thank you very much. Dubya Reloaded! (preface: before you pull the usual, we all understand that polls mean nothing to you, unless they show Kerry leading) http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040910/D8510QA81.html Sep 10, 4:23 PM (ET) By RON FOURNIER WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush opens the fall campaign with a slight lead over Democratic Sen. John Kerry, an Associated Press poll shows, as voters express growing confidence in the direction of the country and the performance of the incumbent. Seven weeks before Election Day, the Republican is considered significantly more decisive, strong and likable than Kerry, and he has strengthened his position on virtually every issue important to voters, from the war in Iraq and creating jobs - two sources of criticism - to matters of national security and values. Since the Democratic National Convention ended in late July, the president has erased any gains Kerry had achieved while reshaping the political landscape in his favor: Nearly two-thirds of voters think protecting the country is more important than creating jobs, and Bush is favored over Kerry by a whopping 23 percentage points on who would keep the United States safe. "If we don't take care of the terrorists, we certainly won't have to worry about the economy," said Janet Cross, 57, of Portsmouth, Ohio, who switched from Democrat to Republican for the last election |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [HELP] "mares m1 rgbm" oppure "aladin ultra" | sor marchese | (Italian) | 49 | 04-11-2007 01:39 PM |
| Diving "Lac de Tignes" /France - Lake from Luc Bessons "the big blue" film | Michael Schmidt | France | 5 | 03-26-2007 12:08 PM |
| Re: OT: George Bush Will be "Outed" and Dissed by Kitty Kelley onSeptember 14 | Joe English | Switzerland | 1 | 03-26-2007 10:55 AM |
| "Hamburg", "Thielbek", "Cap Arcona"... | diverhans | (German) | 94 | 01-03-2007 08:12 AM |
| Re: Nach "Kostenlos telefonieren für 25 Euro" jetzt auch "Kostenloser AOWD" | Joachim Warner | (German) | 12 | 05-12-2006 02:17 PM |