Been to Koh Tao, should I go to PERHENTIANS?

"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:Y4sGe.18887$aY6.14187@newsread1.news.atl.eart hlink.net...

> Fortunately, this time, he reverted to his childish name calling and hate
> mailing before I set him free. He doesn't learn.

More likely, he doesn't care.

Lee Bell wrote:
> "chilly" wrote
>
> > He's in my kf too. But this exchange looks somewhat interesting. I wonder
> > if I should let Bob out of the "box". Hmm, what to do, what to do?

Two childish, silly Ostriches talking to each other.

Grown-ups would choose to read or not to read any post, and ignore
or not ignore what it read.

>
> I've taken him out on occasion too, but always wound up regretting it.

Regretting to find either his lack of knowledge or his silliness
exposed!


> Recently, perhaps now, he's posted some useful stuff, useful enough that I
> considered letting him out again.

Now if that's not the HEIGHT of SILLINESS and SELF-CONTRADICTION, I
don't know what is!!

For someone who doesn't read what I post, how did he KNOW I posted
"useful stuff" and "useful enough" to consider ...


> Fortunately, this time, he reverted to
> his childish name calling and hate mailing before I set him free.

He meant DING-DONG Lee. Of course Lee didn't mind at all when he
called me an "asshole's asshole", did he?

That's why Lee always BRAGS about putting me in his "blocked
sender's list" (killfile) as if it's an accomplishment of his,
rather than him being CHILDISH and plaing the part of an OSTRICH.

EXCEPT, he plays that part very badly. He sneaks and reads my
posts OR is DYING to know what others didn't quote me (such as
morgan), and it KILLS him.

Childish to use killfile. Childish not to have the discipline
NOT to read, and even childish to say
>
Lee> he's posted some useful stuff, useful enough that I
Lee> considered letting him out again.

How did DING-DONG know whether my stuff is useful of not? Besides,
EVERYTHING I posted about Nitrox here this round had been posted
and seen by Lee LONG BEFORE NOW, in scuba-L and scuba-SE --
before he chose to play his role of a rec.scuba Ostrich!

He just didn't learn it the first and the second time ... the
same way he didn't learn about buoyancy control, diving physicd,
dive computers, and dive physiology the first and second times
I posted about them.


> He doesn't learn.
>
> Lee

Greg's right about you, Lee. I COULDN'T CARE LESS, whether
you, chilly, or anyone else puts me on their killfiles.

ONLY DING-DONG Lee and nilly-willy chilly are DUMB enough to
post about their killfiles. LOL!

-- Bob.

Lee Bell wrote:
> "chilly" wrote
>
> > He's in my kf too. But this exchange looks somewhat interesting. I wonder
> > if I should let Bob out of the "box". Hmm, what to do, what to do?

Two childish, silly Ostriches talking to each other.

Grown-ups would choose to read or not to read any post, and ignore
or not ignore what it read.

>
> I've taken him out on occasion too, but always wound up regretting it.

Regretting to find either his lack of knowledge or his silliness
exposed!


> Recently, perhaps now, he's posted some useful stuff, useful enough that I
> considered letting him out again.

Now if that's not the HEIGHT of SILLINESS and SELF-CONTRADICTION, I
don't know what is!!

For someone who doesn't read what I post, how did he KNOW I posted
"useful stuff" and "useful enough" to consider ...


> Fortunately, this time, he reverted to
> his childish name calling and hate mailing before I set him free.

He meant DING-DONG Lee. Of course Lee didn't mind at all when he
called me an "asshole's asshole", did he?

That's why Lee always BRAGS about putting me in his "blocked
sender's list" (killfile) as if it's an accomplishment of his,
rather than him being CHILDISH and plaing the part of an OSTRICH.

EXCEPT, he plays that part very badly. He sneaks and reads my
posts OR is DYING to know what others didn't quote me (such as
morgan), and it KILLS him.

Childish to use killfile. Childish not to have the discipline
NOT to read, and even childish to say
>
Lee> he's posted some useful stuff, useful enough that I
Lee> considered letting him out again.

How did DING-DONG know whether my stuff is useful of not? Besides,
EVERYTHING I posted about Nitrox here this round had been posted
and seen by Lee LONG BEFORE NOW, in scuba-L and scuba-SE --
before he chose to play his role of a rec.scuba Ostrich!

He just didn't learn it the first and the second time ... the
same way he didn't learn about buoyancy control, diving physicd,
dive computers, and dive physiology the first and second times
I posted about them.


> He doesn't learn.
>
> Lee

Greg's right about you, Lee. I COULDN'T CARE LESS, whether
you, chilly, or anyone else puts me on their killfiles.

ONLY DING-DONG Lee and nilly-willy chilly are DUMB enough to
post about their killfiles. LOL!

-- Bob.

Thus spake morgand@cix.compulink.co.uk :

>In article <N1tGe.18900$aY6.11336@newsread1.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
>leebell@ix.netcom.com (Lee Bell) wrote:
>
>>
>> > Just to get back on thread........Would it be ok to use nitrox after 2
>> > or 3 dives (in a day) in the no deco time was getting low ?
>>
>> Sure. If you think it through, it only makes sense. All predominantly
>> oxygen/nitrogen breathing gas is, technically, nitrox, from 21%, which
>> we call air, to 100%, which we call Oxygen. As long as you watch you
>> maximum depths for each mix and correctly calculate the nitrogen
>> loading and unloading for each dive, you can mix and match gas to your
>> heart's content, and the conditions of the dive. Of course,
>> remembering the MOD for each gas and correctly calculating nitrogen
>> transfer can be a bit of a pain. Lucky for us, they make nitrox dive
>> computers to do it for us.
>
>Thanks Lee..........its all becoming a little clearer, i can accept the
>"fact" that it is safer to dive on elevated O2, but what i dont want to do
>is just accept it, I'm sure there are divers that just do that and dive
>"parrot fashion"

"brawk, Polly want 32, brawk"

>i need to understand the principle's involved so if i am
>asked i can explain like you and Stef have done.

I have so many students complain that "I'm going to be using a
computer, why do I need to understand the tables?"

>
>Dave Morgan @ Work in the UK
>Take out the "goes diving" bit....
>Trip photos on line at www.morg.co.uk

--
dillon

Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
of life.

And a damn fine one, at that.

"Greg Mossman" wrote

>> Fortunately, this time, he reverted to his childish name calling and hate
>> mailing before I set him free. He doesn't learn.
>
> More likely, he doesn't care.

He's been ranting to himself and anybody that will listen for years now. He
cares. I'm the one that doesn't.

Lee

"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122767049.844547.292840@z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...

> Greg's right about you, Lee. I COULDN'T CARE LESS, whether
> you, chilly, or anyone else puts me on their killfiles.

Of course I'm right about Lee. I'm always right, as you know.

Greg Mossman wrote:
> "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1122767049.844547.292840@z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...
>
> > Greg's right about you, Lee. I COULDN'T CARE LESS, whether
> > you, chilly, or anyone else puts me on their killfiles.
>
> Of course I'm right about Lee. I'm always right, as you know.

Well, let's put it THIS way. You are USUALLY right, except
when you insert foot in mouth too soon, as you quickly earned
your credit for being an "Anti-Aldora IDIOT", to complement
the Aldora IDIOT Ron Lee.

When you were injudicious enough to try your inexperience in
crossing swords with your Mastah, da Feeesh, you are ALWAYS
wrong, and history proved it!

Are you still trying to find your pre-SAT score your mommy
mistaken to be your IQ? LOL!!!

-- Bob.

"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:11eokbkema38072@corp.supernews.com...
> "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1122767049.844547.292840@z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...
>
> > Greg's right about you, Lee. I COULDN'T CARE LESS, whether
> > you, chilly, or anyone else puts me on their killfiles.


Too funny. Of course Bob cares. He cares very much. He *must* have an
audience.

That said, my bad. I shall desist from further comment because for the most
part, I agree with Kramer. I prefer rec.scuba.locations remain as pure as
possible.

"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote:

> "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> news:UKjGe.63164$%K2.46367@pd7tw1no...
>
> > Lessee now, Stef said he didn't want to get involved in a petty spat. So,
> > um, OK, I'm gonna leave Bob in the "box". I'll just watch Stef deal with
> > this. He seems eminently sensible. One doesn't always see a lot of that
> > here. :^)
>
> "He" ???
>
> Oh shit.
>
> Can't anyone tell those damn Brits that Stef is a girl's name on this side
> of the pond? I believe I've made a terrible mistake. Flirtin' with a
> bloody poofter.


Maybe Stef has a twin sister, Greg



-hh

>> "He" ???
>>
>> Oh shit.
>>
>> Can't anyone tell those damn Brits that Stef is a girl's name on this
>> side
>> of the pond? I believe I've made a terrible mistake. Flirtin' with a
>> bloody poofter.
>
> Maybe Stef has a twin sister, Greg

Maybe Greg has decided to come out of the closet.