|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I've got to the point where I think I need a torch now - I keep finding myself on dives thinking "i wonder what's in / under / behind there". I've been thinking and looking for the last few weeks, and started at a £15 torch, then thought about a Kowalski 620, then Suunto 209's, Mares Phos's, Green Force ones, and now i'm up to Fa&Mi torches. I initially looked at Fa&Mi because of the 2002 Umbilical, which seemed very cheap for an umbilical, while looking very bright, and having the features I wanted (mainly external charging and a 'real' switch - not one of these "unscrew the seal to turn it on" jobbies). I've since been told about a couple of other Fa&Mi ones, which are both the same price (to within £1 for what I want), so i'm a bit stuck now as to what to go for. The 2002 Umbilibal is a 20W Xenon, seemed very bright in the shop, and I think I like the idea of the head being small so i would take it everywhere with me - I think if I had a bigger torch that just hung around the BCD somewhere I would end up leaving it in my bag for most dives. The second option is the 2001 handheld - thats 50W, has a similar burntime, and could get a 30W bulb and extend the burn time much more, and still in theory be brighter than the 2002 umbilical. This one also has a huge range of options for different heads, which I could make into an umbilical with a more powerful lamp (like a HID) in the future without needing a new battery pack. As it is now though, it would be fixed at a high power, and i'm not really sure how big it is to have hanging around. The third option is the Fa&Mi Superstar. For the same price I get 3 power settings, ranging from 50-100 mins burn time, and dual LEDs which will kick in when its on low power and last another 20 hours, even after the battery is too flat to run the main bulb. That one does seem like the best option, but I don't think its upgradeable. All these are made to the same standard, charge in the same time (4 hours), don't have to be opened up at all to charge them (they remain fully sealed all the way through), cost £239 or £240, the weight is about the same for them all, and the switches are all the same style of twisting a magnetic collar, whcih can be locked in the off position too.... and thats all I can think of. The prices are what I would pay, including the external charge module where that's extra - i've already talked to the dive shop and confirmed all that. The main problem i've got in making a decision is the distinct lack of information about any of the Fami stuff - their website has a very vague outline of its features, and they don't seem to be very common in the UK so finding information about them is hard. If anyone knows a source of info on Fami torches (i've seen the review of the 2001 on divernet), for example a manual / marketing sheet / leaflet, or anything really, that'd be really useful. If anyone has tried any of these three, or can make some sort of judgement based on the limited amount I know and offer a bit of advice, i'd appreciate it. I've never used an umbilical torch before, so although it seems like a good idea to me now, would it be suitable for normal recreational diving - ie teaching in Stoney, trips all around the UK to 35m, looking in wrecks, night dives in both UK and in Egypt, that sort of thing. When people have normal lantern type torches, do you usually take it with you on all dives, or just night dives or ones where you think you may be doing wreck penetration or caves and such like. The thing I want to avoid is buying something, but then not using it because its too inconvenient to carry it with me on a dive. Any info and advice appreciated! David |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| David Walker wrote: > I've got to the point where I think I need a torch now - I keep finding > myself on dives thinking "i wonder what's in / under / behind there". I've > been thinking and looking for the last few weeks, and started at a £15 > torch, then thought about a Kowalski 620, then Suunto 209's, Mares Phos's, > Green Force ones, and now i'm up to Fa&Mi torches. If they're the ones I think they are, then they look a bit flimsy. With torches you get what you pay for, if it seems cheap, it's because it is cheap. Paying a bit more will give you a torch that should last for years. Think about the following things before buying a (main) torch): - do you want a rechargeable torch? They cost more, but are going to cost you less in the long run. Backup torches are good candidates for non-rechargeable batteries though. - are you going to use it primarily in the UK, or abroad? If abroad, make sure you can get a dual voltage charger. - what sort of burn time do you need from it? If you cannot charge it between dives, for two dives a day you need a burn time of a couple of hours if you are diving dark UK waters. - are you likely to be doing dives where a torch is required at all times (e.g in some of the rather darker UK waters) or is it just for shining in holes? If in the UK, an umbilical may be easier to handle and can be fixed to your waist strap/backplate/tanks etc. - do you want a HID? The light penetration underwater is in a class of its own, and they have a long burn time compared to filament bulbs. - does the on-off switch require a seal or is it magnetically operated? The switch is likely to be the main failure point and anything mechanical will fail sooner or later. - how reliable are the bulbs and what do they cost to replace? HID bulbs are pretty expensive (and environmentally very unfriendly as they contain mercury) but they last a while. - how reliable are the batteries and what do they cost to replace? Again, environmental issus - lead acid batteries and NiCads are not great here, while lithium batteries are expensive. - Keith |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:25:48 -0000, "David Walker" <wbsdavenews@hotmail.com> wrote: >The main problem i've got in making a decision is the distinct lack of >information about any of the Fami stuff - their website has a very vague >outline of its features, and they don't seem to be very common in the UK so >finding information about them is hard. If anyone knows a source of info on >Fami torches (i've seen the review of the 2001 on divernet), for example a >manual / marketing sheet / leaflet, or anything really, that'd be really >useful. Denney Diving sell them and has a bit of info about each model, that might help http://www.divingdirectshop.co.uk/acatalog/FAMI.html Pete diving 'at' melbourne 'dot' me 'dot' uk |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:00:12 +0000, Pete Melbourne <psmvsl@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:25:48 -0000, "David Walker" ><wbsdavenews@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>The main problem i've got in making a decision is the distinct lack of >>information about any of the Fami stuff - their website has a very vague >>outline of its features, and they don't seem to be very common in the UK so >>finding information about them is hard. If anyone knows a source of info on >>Fami torches (i've seen the review of the 2001 on divernet), for example a >>manual / marketing sheet / leaflet, or anything really, that'd be really >>useful. > >Denney Diving sell them and has a bit of info about each model, that >might help > >http://www.divingdirectshop.co.uk/acatalog/FAMI.html > > > >Pete >diving 'at' melbourne 'dot' me 'dot' uk I had a look at them last time I was in Denneys. They seem solid and well made. SimonK |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "David Walker" <wbsdavenews@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bnp0n3$lhm$1@wisteria.csv.warwick.ac.uk... > I've got to the point where I think I need a torch now - I keep finding > myself on dives thinking "i wonder what's in / under / behind there". I've > been thinking and looking for the last few weeks, and started at a £15 > torch, then thought about a Kowalski 620, then Suunto 209's, Mares Phos's, > Green Force ones, and now i'm up to Fa&Mi torches. > > I initially looked at Fa&Mi because of the 2002 Umbilical, which seemed very > cheap for an umbilical, while looking very bright, and having the features I > wanted (mainly external charging and a 'real' switch - not one of these > "unscrew the seal to turn it on" jobbies). > I've since been told about a couple of other Fa&Mi ones, which are both the > same price (to within £1 for what I want), so i'm a bit stuck now as to what > to go for. I'd still go for a GF every time. I don't think I've yet heard of, or had anyone return a GF torch where they had unscrewed the head too far and flooded it. Just my 2 cents. It's your money to spend. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "David Walker" <wbsdavenews@hotmail.com> wrote: >I've got to the point where I think I need a torch now - I keep finding >myself on dives thinking "i wonder what's in / under / behind there". I've >been thinking and looking for the last few weeks, and started at a £15 >torch, then thought about a Kowalski 620, then Suunto 209's, Mares Phos's, >Green Force ones, and now i'm up to Fa&Mi torches. snip David, Have you looked at the new range of treble-light umbilicals? http://www.treble-light.com/en/produ...epfe.php?id=43 Based on Osram D2S with Auerswald ballast, these are the same bulbs that you find in the newer luxury cars. I don't know if you can buy them in the UK, but Treble does sell directly to teh end user. Contact 'Manuel', he's the only one that speaks English over there. Steven +------------------------------------------------+ | Please use steevke at hotmail dot com to reply | +------------------------------------------------+ | Nunc Plaudite Manibus | +------------------------------------------------+ |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| > Have you looked at the new range of treble-light umbilicals? They look expensive! I've filled in their little form, so with any luck might get a price list sent through - can't say i'm overly hopeful on being able to afford any of them though. David |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| > Email reply bounced Oooooh - yeah. I meant to change that! :o( Try wbsdaveincoming at hotmail.com David |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:54:44 -0000, "Tricky" <scubatricky@nospamyahoo.co.uk> wrote: <Snip> >I'd still go for a GF every time. I have an Impact 100 and I am well pleased with it. I had a shit load of trouble with it when I first got it and Lumb were absolutely brilliant. It turned out to be the umbilical - it was one of those bloody intermittent faults that you could never reproduce on the surface. > I don't think I've yet heard of, or had >anyone return a GF torch where they had unscrewed the head too far and >flooded it. I have but the guy seems to be really dumb. After turning it for about 30 seconds he still hadn't realised that he was unscrewing it and then suddenly floop - it was flooded. As with most things you can't account for stupidity in a design Maybe he should put a sticker on it "clockwise - light, anticlockwise - water" >Just my 2 cents. It's your money to spend. They are expensive but they are worth every penny and as I said above the support from Lumb when it goes t**ts up is brilliant. Laz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A foolproof method for sculpting an Elephant: First, get a huge block of marble. Then, chip away everything that doesn't look like an Elephant. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Change "nospam" to "ntlworld" to reply. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| David Walker wrote: >Really? I was under the impression they were very good torches - £240 for a >little shiny light thing seems like it should do something good!!! I did >get chance to have a look at the 2002 umbilical in Stoney shop last weekend, >and I definately liked that one, but Stoney don't / didn't have the others >so i couldn't look to compare. Didn't seem at all flimsy, so maybe >(hopefully) you're thinking of a different one... > Maybe it's a different one to the one I'm thinking of then. Is it in a sort of blue aluminium case? However, £240 for an umbilical is cheap. I paid nearly £500 for a Hartenberger, a Custom Divers 10W HID is a bit cheaper but still over £400 IIRC. >Mostly Uk - i'll definately look into charger though. >Hmmm, it does say a 220V charger - i'd use it mostly in the UK, and on a >liveaboard in Egypt over Christmas this year. Not sure of the power on a >liveaboard, but i'd assume they use 230V too? Any other diving i'd do in >the short-medium term would all be Europe / Red Sea, so i'd have thought a >single 220v would be fine??? > If you get one with a switch mode power supply it will run off any mains supply, from 110V 60Hz to 240V 50Hz. >At the minute most of the dives I do are up to around 45 minutes - done a >few around an hour, but that isn't the norm. Bearing in mind the usage and >the light levels of where I dive, i would probably do fine with an hour's >burn time, but obviously more is better. > I manag with an hour or so's burn time, but in some cases only because I've been able to charge it between dives in the harbourmaster's office :) Again this is where the HID really scores. - Keith |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MBSUB Torches | Andreas W. Altenberger | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 03-27-2007 12:56 AM |
| Torches | Nige | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 12 | 03-27-2007 12:15 AM |
| Suunto Torches | David Walker | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 1 | 03-27-2007 12:07 AM |
| U/W Torches | Eddie | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 77 | 05-13-2005 06:14 AM |
| Kowlaski Torches | Justin Champion | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 36 | 11-17-2004 06:48 PM |