|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Any one know what the differences are between the MK20 and the MK25 first stage? The MK20 appears to be an old model. I always thought that diaphram was "better" than "piston" - and that the piston regs were usually cheaper. From a search on google however it appears that piston usually offers the better performance and that it is the unbalanced that are usually cheaper. From what I read no scubapro has a "cold water kit" and that all are suitable for cold water (i.e stoney in winter!) Is one (piston or diaphram) preferable to the other? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "James" <james1432@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ASOqb.554$ns4.4460680@news-text.cableinet.net... > Any one know what the differences are between the MK20 and the MK25 first > stage? > > The MK20 appears to be an old model. > > I always thought that diaphram was "better" than "piston" - and that the > piston regs were usually cheaper. From a search on google however it appears > that piston usually offers the better performance and that it is the > unbalanced that are usually cheaper. From what I read no scubapro has a > "cold water kit" and that all are suitable for cold water (i.e stoney in > winter!) > > Is one (piston or diaphram) preferable to the other? > > > > I don't know the exact differences, I'd suggest looking at scubapro's website for that but I do have an MK25 on my main regs and a MK20 on my pony, the DV's are the same - R380's. I get a better breathe out of the MK25's over the MK20, the air also feels warmer than from the MK20. I'd go for the MK25. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| > I don't know the exact differences, I'd suggest looking at scubapro's > website for that but I do have an MK25 on my main regs and a MK20 on my > pony, the DV's are the same - R380's. I get a better breathe out of the > MK25's over the MK20, the air also feels warmer than from the MK20. I'd go > for the MK25. The MK20 appears to be discontinued and specs arent listed on the SP website. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "James" <james1432@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:nf7rb.1824$Yk6.12457061@news-text.cableinet.net... > > I don't know the exact differences, I'd suggest looking at scubapro's > > website for that but I do have an MK25 on my main regs and a MK20 on my > > pony, the DV's are the same - R380's. I get a better breathe out of the > > MK25's over the MK20, the air also feels warmer than from the MK20. I'd go > > for the MK25. > > The MK20 appears to be discontinued and specs arent listed on the SP > website. The MK25 took the place of the MK20. The two second stages are essentially the same except the MK25 allows external adjustment of the intermediate pressure while the MK20 requires use of internal shims. Lee |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| > The MK25 took the place of the MK20. The two second stages are essentially > the same except the MK25 allows external adjustment of the intermediate > pressure while the MK20 requires use of internal shims. Thanks for that! |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
> > > I don't know the exact differences, I'd suggest looking at scubapro's > > > website for that but I do have an MK25 on my main regs and a MK20 on my > > > pony, the DV's are the same - R380's. I get a better breathe out of the > > > MK25's over the MK20, the air also feels warmer than from the MK20. I'd > go > > > for the MK25. > > > > The MK20 appears to be discontinued and specs arent listed on the SP > > website. > > The MK25 took the place of the MK20. The two second stages are essentially > the same except the MK25 allows external adjustment of the intermediate > pressure while the MK20 requires use of internal shims. Have a look at www.scubadiving.com or www.divernet.com for a review. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| M:Scubapro MK25 AF ja R190 | Erkko | (Swedish) | 1 | 04-12-2007 04:33 PM |
| Couplage Détendeur MK18 ou MK25 avec un LEGEND- Possible ??? | Super LILI | (French) | 2 | 04-12-2007 01:04 AM |
| Aggiornamento MK20 a MK25 | etruss | (Italian) | 2 | 04-11-2007 01:59 PM |
| FS:Scubapro D400/Mk25 reg. | J | Gear | 14 | 03-27-2007 12:49 AM |
| Re: Scubapro MK20/MK25 kostenlose Teilerevision durch SCUBAPRO UWATEC | Matthias Römer | (German) | 0 | 06-30-2005 02:01 AM |