scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Regional Travel and Dive News > Europe > United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:17 AM
David Walker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

I've been doing a bit of reading about the relative advantages /
disadvantages of aluminium and steel for a pony, and most seem to suggest
aluminium is preferred because of better balance and bouyancy
characteristics. I was thinking about it, had a look around to find prices,
but for something so highly recommended there are very very few shops that
actually sell aluminium cylinders in the UK - in fact only GoDive seem to
sell them from the shops I know.
Is there some other factor i'm missing as to why shops don't stock them,
should I just stick with steel like most seem to (despite almost all advice
to the contrary)? Are there any disadvantages to aluminium for a pony?

By the way, I will be getting a pony, and it will be back mounted to the
main cylinder - that won't change now, i've already bought the regs and
clamp, just need a cylinder to go with it. And please only advice on how
the cylinder would be useful for a pony in the above situation, not "this
other type won't be good for a pony, but will be great when you go to
twinsets with stages" type answers. :o)

Ta!

David


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:18 AM
Rudy Benner
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

Its spelled Buoyancy

"David Walker" <wbsdavenews@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:boph9p$1fi$1@wisteria.csv.warwick.ac.uk...
> I've been doing a bit of reading about the relative advantages /
> disadvantages of aluminium and steel for a pony, and most seem to suggest
> aluminium is preferred because of better balance and bouyancy
> characteristics. I was thinking about it, had a look around to find

prices,
> but for something so highly recommended there are very very few shops that
> actually sell aluminium cylinders in the UK - in fact only GoDive seem to
> sell them from the shops I know.
> Is there some other factor i'm missing as to why shops don't stock them,
> should I just stick with steel like most seem to (despite almost all

advice
> to the contrary)? Are there any disadvantages to aluminium for a pony?
>
> By the way, I will be getting a pony, and it will be back mounted to the
> main cylinder - that won't change now, i've already bought the regs and
> clamp, just need a cylinder to go with it. And please only advice on how
> the cylinder would be useful for a pony in the above situation, not "this
> other type won't be good for a pony, but will be great when you go to
> twinsets with stages" type answers. :o)
>
> Ta!
>
> David
>
>



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:18 AM
Nigel Hewitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

David Walker wrote:
> I've been doing a bit of reading about the relative advantages /
> disadvantages of aluminium and steel for a pony


If you're clamping it the metal makes no odds at all. If your
side hanging things everybody seems to say 'Go for Ali
as it has better buoyancy' but I hate the things bobbing up
under my arms and getting in my way. My steels stay
tucked in underneath and are predictable, not changing
where they want to sit dependent on contents.
When you're climbing the ladder they both sadly weigh
the same which is where it realy counts.

nigelH


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:18 AM
David Walker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

> Its spelled Buoyancy

For 2.25am, you're lucky it even had the right letters in!

Although "its" should really be "it's".
And 'spelt' sounds much better than 'spelled', although both technically
correct...

Now we've had a little spelling test, any idea about the original question?

David


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:18 AM
Keith S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

David Walker wrote:

> Is there some other factor i'm missing as to why shops don't stock them,
> should I just stick with steel like most seem to (despite almost all advice
> to the contrary)? Are there any disadvantages to aluminium for a pony?


A lot of shops discontinued selling ally cylinders after the Luxfer
problems. You might want to read:

http://www.divernet.com/news/items/luxfer140600.htm
http://www.wahoo2001.com/Diving%20in...explosions.htm

If you're not going to side-sling the tank, there's no reason not to
use steel.

- Keith

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:18 AM
Imorital
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

> I've been doing a bit of reading about the relative advantages /
> disadvantages of aluminium and steel for a pony, and most seem to suggest
> aluminium is preferred because of better balance and bouyancy
> characteristics.


Unless you are in the fortunate position of not needing a weightbelt already
then a steel cylinder will suit you best. A steel cylinder will add a small
amount of weight to your back. A 3L steel cylinder can be easily side slung
later - they really do not weight enough to worry about.

Cheers
Matt.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:18 AM
Nick Bown
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

David Walker <wbsdavenews@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I've been doing a bit of reading about the relative advantages /
> disadvantages of aluminium and steel for a pony, and most seem to suggest
> aluminium is preferred because of better balance and bouyancy
> characteristics.


That may have been true in the past but I was recently looking at stages and
found that there was no buoyancy difference between the current EU Luxfer and
Faber 7l cylinders (visit the manufacturers web sites to get the cylinder
specs and then work out the buoyancy for yourself or visit
http://www.subaqua.co.uk/cgi-bin/cylinder-buoyancy.cgi if you are feeling
lazy and want to check for yourself). Ok, I know the calculations are
'perfect' calculations but they give a very good indication.

With that to one side, I would recommend a steel pony as they weigh less
out of the water (but are slightly more buoyant in the water), are more easy to
come by and, generally, cheaper

Nick
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:18 AM
Lazarus X
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 07:55:04 +0000 (UTC), "Nigel Hewitt"
<nigelh@REMOVETHISnigelhewitt.net> wrote:

>David Walker wrote:
>> I've been doing a bit of reading about the relative advantages /
>> disadvantages of aluminium and steel for a pony

>
>If you're clamping it the metal makes no odds at all. If your
>side hanging things everybody seems to say 'Go for Ali
>as it has better buoyancy' but I hate the things bobbing up
>under my arms and getting in my way. My steels stay
>tucked in underneath and are predictable, not changing
>where they want to sit dependent on contents.
>When you're climbing the ladder they both sadly weigh
>the same which is where it realy counts.


I use the rule steel on back, ali at side but that's just me.

Laz

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A foolproof method for sculpting an Elephant:
First, get a huge block of marble. Then, chip away
everything that doesn't look like an Elephant.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Change "nospam" to "ntlworld" to reply.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-27-2007, 12:18 AM
Jason
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Steel / aluminium for pony cylinders?

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:42:50 +0000, Keith S. wrote:

> If you're not going to side-sling the tank, there's no reason not to
> use steel.


And it doesn't really make a lot of difference with a 3l anyway.

Jason
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need tanks; Al, Steel, lo-steel, yada, yada. Suggestions, Please. padeen Gear 0 03-27-2007 03:43 AM
Stainless Steel Pony Cylinder Mount Paul Gear 0 03-27-2007 01:45 AM
FS: 4 cylinders & 2 pony bottles Dave R United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 0 03-27-2007 12:07 AM
Need tanks; Al, Steel, lo-steel, yada, yada. Suggestions, Please. padeen Divers Hangout 27 03-26-2007 09:09 PM
Aluminium vs Stainless steel backplate murras68 United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 54 11-07-2006 11:42 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.