Bored?

http://junk.dawnshadow.se/yp010.swf

--
ferret
Best before: see end

In article <otks005ua4puu7e0pjv0usrta2u27dmfo1@4ax.com>,
psmvsl@yahoo.co.uk says...
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:01:26 +0000, ferret <ferret@cruelmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://junk.dawnshadow.se/yp010.swf
>
> 283
>
>
>
I got 307.5
someone else here said 335 but didn't show us the evidence.....

Dave
--

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:30 GMT, Dave <capt80@home.atm> wrote:

>I got 307.5
>someone else here said 335 but didn't show us the evidence.....
>

Just got 315 and the guy sitting next to me got 321

Pete Melbourne wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:30 GMT, Dave <capt80@home.atm> wrote:
>
>>I got 307.5
>>someone else here said 335 but didn't show us the evidence.....
>>
>
> Just got 315 and the guy sitting next to me got 321

323.5

--
The box said windows 98 or better, so I installed Linux

Header is false, correct is Danny at danshome dot org

Lines: 20
Message-ID: <400e5b47$0$61061$65c69314@mercury.nildram.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.208.94.234
X-Trace: 1074682695 mercury.nildram.net 61061 213.208.94.234


"Danny Burchett" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:bull7l$i15v3$1@ID-188750.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Pete Melbourne wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:30 GMT, Dave <capt80@home.atm> wrote:
> >
> >>I got 307.5
> >>someone else here said 335 but didn't show us the evidence.....
> >>
> >
> > Just got 315 and the guy sitting next to me got 321
>
> 323.5
>

Only 288 so far. The trick seems to be to get a slightly shallower
trajectory than 45º in order to get bouncing effects.

Pete Melbourne wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:01:26 +0000, ferret <ferret@cruelmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>http://junk.dawnshadow.se/yp010.swf
>
>
> 283

320.1

I especially like it when the angle is too high...

--
Ben Panter, Edinburgh
My name (no spaces)@bigfoot which is a com.

>> 283
>
>320.1

322.9, although ruined somewhat by how overexcited I got...

Rob F.

"ferret" <ferret@cruelmail.com> wrote in message
news:afjs00lmgkhs1e5od2t6devrb4u38j7t5c@4ax.com...
> http://junk.dawnshadow.se/yp010.swf
>

Outstanding!

What's the best for "sticky-in"? I've got 207.5...

> "beanie" <nospam@diving.ukdiver.com> wrote in message
> news:oZuPb.790$af.150@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >
> > "Chris Quinn" <chris.quinn@nospam.zoom.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:bulu25$8m5$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > What's the least distance anyone has got while actually hitting it?
> > >
> > > I've got 62.1
> > >
> > 319.1 thus far
> >
> > wanna screen shot?
"Chris Quinn" <chris.quinn@nospam.zoom.co.uk> wrote in message
news:buluhf$tp$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> 319.1 is your shortest distance? Man, you must be good!
>
k so I read what I expect to see that's not my fault
53.6 as there is a bug just don't bother clicking to hit - clears up after
you hit once

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:25:43 -0000, "CAS"
<calumscottTAKETHISBITOUT@yahoo.com> wrote:

>What's the best for "sticky-in"? I've got 207.5...

0.5 out. Bah.
--
ferret
Best before: see end