Easily find others into Scuba Diving, in your UK postcode area

In article <VPyfc.27251$Lg.20608@fe07.usenetserver.com>,
diver <diver@gyrosystem.co.uk> wrote:
>Thanks for your explanation - Here's mine.

Nah. Why don't you just fuck off? *plonk*

That's the sound of you being dropped into my kill-file. I've also
blocked you from emailling me or any of the lists via my servers.

Good Bye.

Gordon

Thank you Eddie.
It seems some of your buddies are far less well mannered than yourself.
I'm sorry if I offended anyone - but you guys!

You know - as a group, you fellas sure know how to make a Gal feel welcome!

Regards

D.


"Eddie" <Eddie@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c5mm98$15t$1@titan.btinternet.com...
>
> "CAS" <calumscottREMOVETHISBIT@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c5ml22$3hafk$1@ID-193985.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > Children all! If you had just wound your effing necks in from the very
> > start
> > > and just said nuffing to someone who may or may not have something to
> say,
> > > life would be a little quieter and less bandwith used here IMHO.
> > >
> > > But that is just me!
> > >
> > > Eddie
> >
> > Can't dive on a school day, fuckwit baiting is the next best thing!
>
> And me only a humble teaching assistant trying to earn my beer tokens part
> time! )
>
> Eddie
>
> Still thinking about those Medes Island Groupers.
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.658 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 09/04/04
>
>

Anders Arnholm write:
> diver wrote:
> > I am unaware of your 'charter' - what is it? Presumably this is a list
> > of do's and don'ts for your particular newsgroup? Or is this for all
> > newsgroups?. My sincere apologies if I have 'trounced' over some of
> > these - I had an involvement in 1992 with the pre-cursor to newsgroups
> > (before they were called this - remember DEC notes?) and there were no
> > such things as 'charters' back then.
>
> You obiusly doesn't know your history, a quick look on the internet
> would have helped you not making a fool out of your self. The usenet
> that this group is a part of have been around since about 1979...

Absolutely...

USENET as we know it came into existance in 1985-86 with the Great
Renaming, see http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~frossie/gr.html for details,
but the precursor network was indeed around from 1979 onwards and operated
over the ARPAnet.

His claim that USENET wasn't around in 1992 is totally stupid. His claim
that groups didn't have charters is simply silly. I think he's mistake us
for some dumb web forum thing...

Al.

The round window said it was Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:04:17 +0100,so
Pete Melbourne <psmvsl@yahoo.co.uk> grabbed his blunt crayon and
scrawled:

>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:56:25 +0100, "diver" <diver@gyrosystem.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>Pete - what, on earth, are you objecting to here?
>>
>>Here's a site - becoming popular with the Scuba clan which I'm announcing.
>>And - yes! - I had a hand in it's creation but so what? I dive and find it
>>useful myself. Why are you SO defensive?
>>
>>The site is free to join. The advertisers have not paid a penny (although
>>this may have to change in future to fund the site). The adverts are
>>filtered for members' particular interests anyway. Clubs & Organisations can
>>promote themselves for free. So why are you throwing all your toys out the
>>pram and being so offensive?
>>
>>Don't bother responding if it's just more abuse.
>>
>
>1 - Your top posting (again)
>
>2 - Your original two posts made no mention of the fact you are
>involved in the site and were phrased in a way that tried to give the
>impression that you were just a user, this in my book is lieing
>
>3 - You've said you have to take advertising to keep it going that
>makes it a commercial site and advertising commercial sites here more
>than once a month is against the charter
>
>4 - Advertising commercial sites without identifying the said advert
>in the subject line of the post is against the charter.
>
>5 - Your first two posts here broke four rules and you attempted to
>defend your position

abuse@usenetserver.com

Is your friend, about 5 from here, and he'll say bye bye to his
account there.

--

Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas...
R1150GS..just like it's owner, big, ugly but fun!
IBW #36 APOSTLE#14

What's top posting?



"Ian" <spam@ukrm.net (really address ian@ukrmREMOVETOMAIL.net)> wrote in
message news:dpoc801gp8r501kscnuhuofbfl05raaeer@4ax.com...
> The round window said it was Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:04:17 +0100,so
> Pete Melbourne <psmvsl@yahoo.co.uk> grabbed his blunt crayon and
> scrawled:
>
> >On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:56:25 +0100, "diver" <diver@gyrosystem.co.uk>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>Pete - what, on earth, are you objecting to here?
> >>
> >>Here's a site - becoming popular with the Scuba clan which I'm
announcing.
> >>And - yes! - I had a hand in it's creation but so what? I dive and find
it
> >>useful myself. Why are you SO defensive?
> >>
> >>The site is free to join. The advertisers have not paid a penny
(although
> >>this may have to change in future to fund the site). The adverts are
> >>filtered for members' particular interests anyway. Clubs & Organisations
can
> >>promote themselves for free. So why are you throwing all your toys out
the
> >>pram and being so offensive?
> >>
> >>Don't bother responding if it's just more abuse.
> >>
> >
> >1 - Your top posting (again)
> >
> >2 - Your original two posts made no mention of the fact you are
> >involved in the site and were phrased in a way that tried to give the
> >impression that you were just a user, this in my book is lieing
> >
> >3 - You've said you have to take advertising to keep it going that
> >makes it a commercial site and advertising commercial sites here more
> >than once a month is against the charter
> >
> >4 - Advertising commercial sites without identifying the said advert
> >in the subject line of the post is against the charter.
> >
> >5 - Your first two posts here broke four rules and you attempted to
> >defend your position
>
> abuse@usenetserver.com
>
> Is your friend, about 5 from here, and he'll say bye bye to his
> account there.
>
> --
>
> Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas...
> R1150GS..just like it's owner, big, ugly but fun!
> IBW #36 APOSTLE#14

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:00:15 +0000 (UTC), "Steve Carmichael-Timson"
<stevect@dont.even.bother.com> wrote:

>What's top posting?
>
>

A cardinal sin in Usenet that is almost as bad as not snipping
--
Pete

news 'at' melbourne 'dot' me 'dot' uk