|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi, I am returning to diving after a short absence, now that my son is a little older. I used to dive with twin 12's on air or Nitrox, after a while of not diving, I sold the regs, twinset, wings and backplate. I'm notw thinking that an Insipration may be the way to go, I like the idea of the reduced weight over a twinset and for the dives that I like it has reduced deco advantages for me. Can anyone recommend an instructor that can get me through the course and also sell me a unit. I'm based in Dublin so any Irish instructors would be good but apart from that my 'home' is in the Midlands so anywhere in and around a few hours of Birmingham would be good. Cheers, Matt |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <cf7ova$bcv$1@kermit.esat.net>, Matt Lemon <matthew@jacklemon.com> wrote: >Can anyone recommend an instructor that can get me through the course and >also sell me a unit. I'm based in Dublin so any Irish instructors would be >good but apart from that my 'home' is in the Midlands so anywhere in and >around a few hours of Birmingham would be good. The Ambient Pressure Diving web site has a list of Instructors - http://www.ambientpressurediving.com/ and you can always give Nicky or Sarah at the factory a call to get the latet information. Gordon |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:44:17 +0100, "Matt Lemon" <matthew@jacklemon.com> wrote: >I'm notw thinking that an Insipration may be the way to go, I like the idea >of the reduced weight over a twinset and for the dives that I like it has >reduced deco advantages for me. I like the idea of reduced weight, pity it's not true Laz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A foolproof method for sculpting an Elephant: First, get a huge block of marble. Then, chip away everything that doesn't look like an Elephant. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Change "nospam" to "ntlworld" to reply. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Lazarus X <lazarusx@nospam.com> wrote: > "Matt Lemon" wrote: > >> I'm notw thinking that an Insipration may be the way to go, I like the idea >> of the reduced weight over a twinset and for the dives that I like it has >> reduced deco advantages for me. > > I like the idea of reduced weight, pity it's not true Sad but true. A twinset is seriously negative and my 300/10 were negative with attitude but the ol' turtle is about neutral and you have to make up the difference in lead. Saying you ought to try before you buy seems sound but we know it's addictive so once you have a go it's pretty predictable you will just max out the credit card and get one anyhow. nigelH |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:45:03 +0000 (UTC), "Nigel Hewitt" <news@REMOVETHISnigelhewitt.co.uk> wrote: >Lazarus X <lazarusx@nospam.com> wrote: > >> "Matt Lemon" wrote: >> >>> I'm notw thinking that an Insipration may be the way to go, I like the idea >>> of the reduced weight over a twinset and for the dives that I like it has >>> reduced deco advantages for me. >> >> I like the idea of reduced weight, pity it's not true > >Sad but true. A twinset is seriously negative and my 300/10 were >negative with attitude but the ol' turtle is about neutral and you have >to make up the difference in lead. The counter lungs are the problem. With OC, your buoyancy constantly changes with lung volume and the effective buoyancy will be driven by the average between fully inhaled and fully exhaled (or slight towards fully inhaled if you are a breath holder). With CCR, your effective buoyancy will be driven by volume that you run the counter lungs at which is typically about 3/4 of max lung volume. The problem is all that extra gas requires lead to sink it. IMO the key to rebreather comfort (i.e. avoiding Inspiration back) is to get the weight of the weight belt and the lower part of the unit. I initially used the weight pockets but I retired them at the request of my back. I then run weights down the side of the harness for a while but I have now moved to a backplate. Laz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A foolproof method for sculpting an Elephant: First, get a huge block of marble. Then, chip away everything that doesn't look like an Elephant. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Change "nospam" to "ntlworld" to reply. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Lazarus X" <lazarusx@nospam.com> wrote in message news:lehfh0tuhqlkl9cuhg3tnm743egs253g47@4ax.com... > The counter lungs are the problem. With OC, your buoyancy constantly > changes with lung volume and the effective buoyancy will be driven by > the average between fully inhaled and fully exhaled (or slight towards > fully inhaled if you are a breath holder). With CCR, your effective > buoyancy will be driven by volume that you run the counter lungs at > which is typically about 3/4 of max lung volume. The problem is all > that extra gas requires lead to sink it. > > IMO the key to rebreather comfort (i.e. avoiding Inspiration back) is > to get the weight of the weight belt and the lower part of the unit. > I initially used the weight pockets but I retired them at the request > of my back. I then run weights down the side of the harness for a > while but I have now moved to a backplate. I'm sure you didn't mean to write it the way that it reads - Your counter lungs should be run at minimum loop volume, certainly to leave the surface you'll need the whole loop empty if you're correctly weighted, then the counter lungs should only contain enough for one full breath: This is minimum loop - the minimum amount to refresh your lungs, any less and you run the risks of CO2 retention, any more and you'll use more O2, more gas in the counterlungs requires more O2 to reach the set PO2 and chances are that you'll be dumping more excess gas that you don't need with that O2 in it (by volume) controlling the buoyancy as O2 injection duration will be greater. All buoyancy control is achieved using the buoyancy control device. Breath holding is a bad on a RB as it is OC When you achieve the correct trim in the water (Single, Twin or on a RB) you'll find that instead of the weight hanging on your hips, it will remain for the entire dive, pulling in the small of your back across your backbone and hence why we then start looking at weight distribution, a stainless steel plate being one aspect of that. A lot of the deeper RB divers and cave divers put the weight inside the case, _BUT_ they generally carry ditchable in their pockets as well, remember if you are correctly weighted at the start then ditching just 2KG (just a set of ankle weights in your thigh pockets), is enough to keep you on the surface. Best /F http://www.e-aquanauts.com Technical Training. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In article <lehfh0tuhqlkl9cuhg3tnm743egs253g47@4ax.com>, Lazarus X <lazarusx@nospam.com> wrote: >>>> I'm notw thinking that an Insipration may be the way to go, I like the idea >>>> of the reduced weight over a twinset and for the dives that I like it has >>>> reduced deco advantages for me. >>> >>> I like the idea of reduced weight, pity it's not true >> >>Sad but true. A twinset is seriously negative and my 300/10 were >>negative with attitude but the ol' turtle is about neutral and you have >>to make up the difference in lead. > >The counter lungs are the problem. Actually they're not. Assuming you are running them at minimal volume on a CCR, anyway. The problem is really the rest of the loop - ISTR that it's the best part of 6 litres, maybe more, and as far as we are concerned, it's rigid, so it's volume isn't going to change. Even with 2.5Kg of Sofmolime in it, theres still that additional lead required to sink it. Gordon |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Gordon Henderson <gordon@lion.drogon.net> wrote: > The problem is really the rest of the loop - ISTR that it's the best part > of 6 litres, maybe more, and as far as we are concerned, it's rigid, so > it's volume isn't going to change. Even with 2.5Kg of Sofmolime in it, > theres still that additional lead required to sink it. Hey Gordon, I have it in my head from somewhere that a standard Inspitartion is just about neutral straight out of the crate with tanks, 'lime but no lead but I don't know where I got that idea from. Can you confirm or deny? nigelH |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:37:32 +0000 (UTC), gordon@lion.drogon.net (Gordon Henderson) wrote: >In article <lehfh0tuhqlkl9cuhg3tnm743egs253g47@4ax.com>, >Lazarus X <lazarusx@nospam.com> wrote: > >>>>> I'm notw thinking that an Insipration may be the way to go, I like the idea >>>>> of the reduced weight over a twinset and for the dives that I like it has >>>>> reduced deco advantages for me. >>>> >>>> I like the idea of reduced weight, pity it's not true >>> >>>Sad but true. A twinset is seriously negative and my 300/10 were >>>negative with attitude but the ol' turtle is about neutral and you have >>>to make up the difference in lead. >> >>The counter lungs are the problem. > >Actually they're not. Assuming you are running them at minimal volume >on a CCR, anyway. > >The problem is really the rest of the loop - ISTR that it's the best part >of 6 litres, maybe more, and as far as we are concerned, it's rigid, so >it's volume isn't going to change. Even with 2.5Kg of Sofmolime in it, >theres still that additional lead required to sink it. Good point, I had never actually though of it that way. There is a lot of gas in the rest of the loop which is dead easy to demonstrate by manually injecting O2 and seeing how long it takes to hit the cells. For me it is just as I breath in on the third breath. Laz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A foolproof method for sculpting an Elephant: First, get a huge block of marble. Then, chip away everything that doesn't look like an Elephant. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Change "nospam" to "ntlworld" to reply. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| In article <cf8rdl$d8d$1@titan.btinternet.com>, Nigel Hewitt <news@REMOVETHISnigelhewitt.co.uk> wrote: >Gordon Henderson <gordon@lion.drogon.net> wrote: > >> The problem is really the rest of the loop - ISTR that it's the best part >> of 6 litres, maybe more, and as far as we are concerned, it's rigid, so >> it's volume isn't going to change. Even with 2.5Kg of Sofmolime in it, >> theres still that additional lead required to sink it. > >Hey Gordon, > >I have it in my head from somewhere that a standard Inspitartion >is just about neutral straight out of the crate with tanks, 'lime but >no lead but I don't know where I got that idea from. > >Can you confirm or deny? Can't do either as I don't really know... My unit has integrated weight pockets so it will sink rather rapidly if I let the gas out and it's been a long time since I've been on a RIB with a weight belt so I don't really know... I also have the old fibreglass case on mine still, so that might make a difference... I have seen someone[1] remove the back off a new case underwater and it seemed fairly neutral underwater, so the new case might not be an issue... Lets see.. Manifold (brass, -ve), Sofnolime (-ve), pillar valves (-ve) cylinders (+ve) airhoses (-ve) handsets (-ve) headset, sensors, batterys (-ve) and breathing loop and canister (+ve) So maybe it does all balance up... I do know that I need more or less the same amount of lead on my unit as I used to use when diving twin 10's, although I've recently removed the backplate and gone back to the standard harness without adding any more lead to the weight pouches... (which might explain why I felt a bit floaty at Teignmouth.. Hmmm. Ah well, I'd better get used to it, I guess!) Gordon [1] Big Mike from the factory. Do not dive with this man!!! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS Inspiration | Pete S. | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 03-27-2007 01:24 AM |
| The Inspiration | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 110 | 03-27-2007 01:00 AM |
| A Little Inspiration | Lee Bell | Divers Hangout | 40 | 03-26-2007 09:32 PM |
| INSPIRATION | Ben Green | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 49 | 06-27-2005 04:08 PM |
| Inspiration | David Mahon | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 315 | 04-13-2005 03:55 PM |