|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Correct me if I'm wrong, but if a tank is rusty over its entire surface - especially round the neck, isn't that time to throw it away? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| F9 wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but if a tank is rusty over its entire surface > - especially round the neck, isn't that time to throw it away? Well, possibly. It depends on how bad the rust is, and whether it's just surface rust or the structural integrity of the bottle has actually been compromised. If it's just surface rust you might be able to get it cleaned up and back into service. Al. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Alasdair Allan" <aa@ukrecscuba.org.uk> wrote in message news:2ri85dF18smncU1@uni-berlin.de... > F9 wrote: >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but if a tank is rusty over its entire surface >> - especially round the neck, isn't that time to throw it away? > > Well, possibly. It depends on how bad the rust is, and whether it's just > surface rust or the structural integrity of the bottle has actually been > compromised. If it's just surface rust you might be able to get it cleaned > up and back into service. > > Al. Thanks. Let me be more specific. The rust (no attempt to cover it with paint and it is all over) is at a level where the surface of the bottle has pitted and looks more like a teenager with very bad acne. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "F9" <spiritus@thefreeinternet.co.uk> wrote in message news:4153edee$0$69736$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp- > Thanks. Let me be more specific. The rust (no attempt to cover it with > paint and it is all over) is at a level where the surface of the bottle > has pitted and looks more like a teenager with very bad acne. I was once left with no option but to throw away a cylinder which was in that condition. - It came back from a test, sawn in two :) Matt |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "F9" wrote > Thanks. Let me be more specific. The rust (no attempt to cover it with paint > and it is all over) is at a level where the surface of the bottle has pitted > and looks more like a teenager with very bad acne. There are still two options: 1. Have it tested to determine whether it's serviceable or not. The odds are, it's not, but the only way to know for sure is to test it. There's a cost associated with testing, probably even if it fails. If the tank passes, you're still going to have problems getting it filled. No shop wants a tank that looks like it will fail hooked up to one of its fill whips. 2. Chose to scrap the tank now and buy a new or previously owned one. Personally, this would be my choice. I would rather avoid problems at the fill station than save the cost of a replacement for the relatively shorter remaining life of that tank. If I were to scrap the tank, I would drill at least one conspicuous hole in it. The larger the better. Lee |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:LNT4d.11$Ki1.0@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.n et... > "F9" wrote > >> Thanks. Let me be more specific. The rust (no attempt to cover it with > paint >> and it is all over) is at a level where the surface of the bottle has > pitted >> and looks more like a teenager with very bad acne. > > There are still two options: > > 1. Have it tested to determine whether it's serviceable or not. The odds > are, it's not, but the only way to know for sure is to test it. There's a > cost associated with testing, probably even if it fails. If the tank > passes, you're still going to have problems getting it filled. No shop > wants a tank that looks like it will fail hooked up to one of its fill > whips. > > 2. Chose to scrap the tank now and buy a new or previously owned one. > Personally, this would be my choice. I would rather avoid problems at the > fill station than save the cost of a replacement for the relatively > shorter > remaining life of that tank. If I were to scrap the tank, I would drill > at > least one conspicuous hole in it. The larger the better. > > Lee All this sounds very sensible to me. Now, what if I were to tell you that I know of a dive shop (admittedly not in this country) that has their entire stock of tanks in this condition - used both for training and for dive packages. Oh and they all have dual 'o' rings on them. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| F9 wrote: > All this sounds very sensible to me. Now, what if I were to tell you > that I know of a dive shop (admittedly not in this country) that has > their entire stock of tanks in this condition - used both for training > and for dive packages. Oh and they all have dual 'o' rings on them. I'd say it's pretty common, I know at least one operation in this country I could say the same thing about and I know at least one that regularly pumps fills contamined with oil. I avoid them... *shrug* It's obvious that you want to bad-mouth some dive operation you've been to. I don't particularly like the way you're going about it, posting lead in questions to try and back the "group consensus" into a corner, and then sucker punch us with, a "Oh, so this is a bad dive operation then" type thing. Either name and shame, and see if there is dissenting opinion, or be quiet. Al. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Alasdair Allan" <aa@ukrecscuba.org.uk> wrote in message news:2ripanF1ali4hU1@uni-berlin.de... > I'd say it's pretty common, I know at least one operation in this country > I could say the same thing about and I know at least one that regularly > pumps fills contamined with oil. I avoid them... *shrug* > Either name and shame, and see if there is dissenting opinion, or be > quiet. > > Al. Avoid who? MarkW nospam to scuba to reply |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| > I know at least one that regularly > pumps fills contamined with oil. I avoid them... *shrug* Would they also happen to give free fills (I've only heard one person say it before and wasn't sure if they were just unlucky, but sounds like it might be a more common problem...)? David |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:45:06 GMT, "David Walker" <wbsdavenews@hotmail.com> wrote: >> I know at least one that regularly >> pumps fills contamined with oil. I avoid them... *shrug* > >Would they also happen to give free fills (I've only heard one person say it >before and wasn't sure if they were just unlucky, but sounds like it might >be a more common problem...)? I have had a couple of bad fills a few years back from these guys. -- Laz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A foolproof method for sculpting an Elephant: First, get a huge block of marble. Then, chip away everything that doesn't look like an Elephant. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Change "nospam" to "ntlworld" to reply. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about correct action | Rod | Divers Hangout | 35 | 03-26-2007 09:45 PM |
| What's wrong with this picture? | Douglas W. \Popeye\ Frederick | Divers Hangout | 109 | 03-26-2007 07:09 PM |
| Re: Mrs. Bush was given two chances to declare the correct amount of tax ow | Lee Bell | Divers Hangout | 38 | 03-26-2007 11:49 AM |
| Re: Mrs. Bush was given two chances to declare the correct amount of tax ow | Joe | Divers Hangout | 0 | 03-26-2007 11:48 AM |
| buddy breathing. correct technique | Matt | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 7 | 02-19-2005 01:13 AM |