|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| In article <d0fhhs$pnr$1@news.cybercity.dk>, Dave <spam@someone.else> writes >If you think you may have a heartcondition, I definitely think you >should get it tested (even if you are not diving). >Testing for PFO should simply be a matter of making an ECG >(echocardiography), but the doc will probably make an EEG >(electrocardiography) first, as this could rule-out the possibility of >an PFO (thus making the ECG unnecessary). You've made a few mistakes there with your abbreviations. Echo (echocardiogram) is the test of choice for PFO. ECG [US:EKG] (electrocardiogram) may show nothing - plenty of PFOs have no adverse effects on electrical activity and in those few that do, the electrical effects may be intermittent. EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. >Both examinations are quite simple and fast, and have no special >prerequisites on your part. ECG is simple, EEG a little less so and the most sensitive type of echocardiogram is performed via a trans-oesophageal route, which may be a little uncomfortable. -- David Mahon |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| In article <d0fhhs$pnr$1@news.cybercity.dk>, Dave <spam@someone.else> writes >If you think you may have a heartcondition, I definitely think you >should get it tested (even if you are not diving). >Testing for PFO should simply be a matter of making an ECG >(echocardiography), but the doc will probably make an EEG >(electrocardiography) first, as this could rule-out the possibility of >an PFO (thus making the ECG unnecessary). You've made a few mistakes there with your abbreviations. Echo (echocardiogram) is the test of choice for PFO. ECG [US:EKG] (electrocardiogram) may show nothing - plenty of PFOs have no adverse effects on electrical activity and in those few that do, the electrical effects may be intermittent. EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. >Both examinations are quite simple and fast, and have no special >prerequisites on your part. ECG is simple, EEG a little less so and the most sensitive type of echocardiogram is performed via a trans-oesophageal route, which may be a little uncomfortable. -- David Mahon |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| In article <d0fhhs$pnr$1@news.cybercity.dk>, Dave <spam@someone.else> writes >If you think you may have a heartcondition, I definitely think you >should get it tested (even if you are not diving). >Testing for PFO should simply be a matter of making an ECG >(echocardiography), but the doc will probably make an EEG >(electrocardiography) first, as this could rule-out the possibility of >an PFO (thus making the ECG unnecessary). You've made a few mistakes there with your abbreviations. Echo (echocardiogram) is the test of choice for PFO. ECG [US:EKG] (electrocardiogram) may show nothing - plenty of PFOs have no adverse effects on electrical activity and in those few that do, the electrical effects may be intermittent. EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. >Both examinations are quite simple and fast, and have no special >prerequisites on your part. ECG is simple, EEG a little less so and the most sensitive type of echocardiogram is performed via a trans-oesophageal route, which may be a little uncomfortable. -- David Mahon |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| In article <d0fhhs$pnr$1@news.cybercity.dk>, Dave <spam@someone.else> writes >If you think you may have a heartcondition, I definitely think you >should get it tested (even if you are not diving). >Testing for PFO should simply be a matter of making an ECG >(echocardiography), but the doc will probably make an EEG >(electrocardiography) first, as this could rule-out the possibility of >an PFO (thus making the ECG unnecessary). You've made a few mistakes there with your abbreviations. Echo (echocardiogram) is the test of choice for PFO. ECG [US:EKG] (electrocardiogram) may show nothing - plenty of PFOs have no adverse effects on electrical activity and in those few that do, the electrical effects may be intermittent. EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. >Both examinations are quite simple and fast, and have no special >prerequisites on your part. ECG is simple, EEG a little less so and the most sensitive type of echocardiogram is performed via a trans-oesophageal route, which may be a little uncomfortable. -- David Mahon |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| In article <pPiO$e43a2KCFwGm@earth.amigo.co.uk>, David Mahon <news@amigo.co.uk> writes >EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although >it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed >routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. oops - NOT performed routinely [for headaches]. -- David Mahon |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| In article <pPiO$e43a2KCFwGm@earth.amigo.co.uk>, David Mahon <news@amigo.co.uk> writes >EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although >it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed >routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. oops - NOT performed routinely [for headaches]. -- David Mahon |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| In article <pPiO$e43a2KCFwGm@earth.amigo.co.uk>, David Mahon <news@amigo.co.uk> writes >EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although >it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed >routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. oops - NOT performed routinely [for headaches]. -- David Mahon |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| In article <pPiO$e43a2KCFwGm@earth.amigo.co.uk>, David Mahon <news@amigo.co.uk> writes >EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although >it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed >routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. oops - NOT performed routinely [for headaches]. -- David Mahon |
|
#29
| |||
| |||
| In article <pPiO$e43a2KCFwGm@earth.amigo.co.uk>, David Mahon <news@amigo.co.uk> writes >EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although >it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed >routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. oops - NOT performed routinely [for headaches]. -- David Mahon |
|
#30
| |||
| |||
| In article <pPiO$e43a2KCFwGm@earth.amigo.co.uk>, David Mahon <news@amigo.co.uk> writes >EEG (electroencephalogram) is something different altogether - although >it may be used for the investigation of headaches it is performed >routinely and will certainly not show a PFO. oops - NOT performed routinely [for headaches]. -- David Mahon |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| headaches | F9 | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 10 | 10-28-2004 12:26 PM |
| Headaches | ITMA | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 40 | 10-18-2004 06:09 AM |