scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Regional Travel and Dive News > Europe > United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:05 AM
CAS
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

>> pleased everyone is ok but

Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
done!

>> Can we have a bit more information please.
>>
>> wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>> away??

>
> City of Waterford.
> 35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
> I don't know the run time on this individual and I
> have been asked not to identify people but those that
> were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
> bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
> all so it was a good day.


At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
concentrate on does for seasickness!

> We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
> the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
> things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.


I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
to do.

So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
(says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
wall dive yesterday...)

CAS


Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:05 AM
CAS
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

>> pleased everyone is ok but

Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
done!

>> Can we have a bit more information please.
>>
>> wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>> away??

>
> City of Waterford.
> 35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
> I don't know the run time on this individual and I
> have been asked not to identify people but those that
> were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
> bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
> all so it was a good day.


At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
concentrate on does for seasickness!

> We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
> the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
> things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.


I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
to do.

So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
(says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
wall dive yesterday...)

CAS


Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:05 AM
CAS
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

>> pleased everyone is ok but

Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
done!

>> Can we have a bit more information please.
>>
>> wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>> away??

>
> City of Waterford.
> 35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
> I don't know the run time on this individual and I
> have been asked not to identify people but those that
> were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
> bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
> all so it was a good day.


At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
concentrate on does for seasickness!

> We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
> the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
> things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.


I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
to do.

So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
(says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
wall dive yesterday...)

CAS


Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:05 AM
CAS
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

>> pleased everyone is ok but

Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
done!

>> Can we have a bit more information please.
>>
>> wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>> away??

>
> City of Waterford.
> 35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
> I don't know the run time on this individual and I
> have been asked not to identify people but those that
> were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
> bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
> all so it was a good day.


At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
concentrate on does for seasickness!

> We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
> the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
> things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.


I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
to do.

So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
(says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
wall dive yesterday...)

CAS


Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:40 AM
Danny Burchett
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

CAS wrote:
>>>pleased everyone is ok but

>
>
> Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
> done!
>
>
>>>Can we have a bit more information please.
>>>
>>>wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>>>away??

>>
>>City of Waterford.
>>35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
>>I don't know the run time on this individual and I
>>have been asked not to identify people but those that
>>were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
>>bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
>>all so it was a good day.

>
>
> At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
> concentrate on does for seasickness!
>
>
>>We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
>>the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
>>things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.

>
>
> I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
> to do.
>
> So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
> what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
> the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
> (says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
> wall dive yesterday...)
>
> CAS
>
>


I think the divers want to remain anonymous, so I will post the info
that I have from them.

Diver one was diving a drager dolphin SCR rebreather. His dive went
normally, with 27 mins of stops to do he fired the SMB from the bottom
(31M) and started to ascend. The ascent went as planned until about 25M
where something, the diver does not know what started to run away on a
buoyant ascent. He pulled the neck seal of the suit thinking that it was
that, it wasn't, he did however flood the suit. He was not able to reel
in the line fast enough on his SMB, that line then got caught round him
as he ascended reducing his ability to do much to try to sort things
out. When he surface another boat that had seen the line rapidly
appearing at the surface picked him up and freed him, he was then
transferred to our boat.

Diver Two was diving twins, he left the bottom with stops (I don't know
how much) and proceeded on a normal ascent, he got to stop depth and
stopped, completing most of his deco. With 2 mins of deco left someone
else's SMB went past him and tangled in his, he was then dragged up, he
did release his SMB, by this time however it was too late and he was on
the surface.

Hope that answers any questions.

Danny
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:40 AM
Danny Burchett
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

CAS wrote:
>>>pleased everyone is ok but

>
>
> Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
> done!
>
>
>>>Can we have a bit more information please.
>>>
>>>wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>>>away??

>>
>>City of Waterford.
>>35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
>>I don't know the run time on this individual and I
>>have been asked not to identify people but those that
>>were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
>>bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
>>all so it was a good day.

>
>
> At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
> concentrate on does for seasickness!
>
>
>>We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
>>the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
>>things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.

>
>
> I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
> to do.
>
> So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
> what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
> the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
> (says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
> wall dive yesterday...)
>
> CAS
>
>


I think the divers want to remain anonymous, so I will post the info
that I have from them.

Diver one was diving a drager dolphin SCR rebreather. His dive went
normally, with 27 mins of stops to do he fired the SMB from the bottom
(31M) and started to ascend. The ascent went as planned until about 25M
where something, the diver does not know what started to run away on a
buoyant ascent. He pulled the neck seal of the suit thinking that it was
that, it wasn't, he did however flood the suit. He was not able to reel
in the line fast enough on his SMB, that line then got caught round him
as he ascended reducing his ability to do much to try to sort things
out. When he surface another boat that had seen the line rapidly
appearing at the surface picked him up and freed him, he was then
transferred to our boat.

Diver Two was diving twins, he left the bottom with stops (I don't know
how much) and proceeded on a normal ascent, he got to stop depth and
stopped, completing most of his deco. With 2 mins of deco left someone
else's SMB went past him and tangled in his, he was then dragged up, he
did release his SMB, by this time however it was too late and he was on
the surface.

Hope that answers any questions.

Danny
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:40 AM
Danny Burchett
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

CAS wrote:
>>>pleased everyone is ok but

>
>
> Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
> done!
>
>
>>>Can we have a bit more information please.
>>>
>>>wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>>>away??

>>
>>City of Waterford.
>>35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
>>I don't know the run time on this individual and I
>>have been asked not to identify people but those that
>>were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
>>bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
>>all so it was a good day.

>
>
> At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
> concentrate on does for seasickness!
>
>
>>We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
>>the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
>>things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.

>
>
> I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
> to do.
>
> So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
> what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
> the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
> (says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
> wall dive yesterday...)
>
> CAS
>
>


I think the divers want to remain anonymous, so I will post the info
that I have from them.

Diver one was diving a drager dolphin SCR rebreather. His dive went
normally, with 27 mins of stops to do he fired the SMB from the bottom
(31M) and started to ascend. The ascent went as planned until about 25M
where something, the diver does not know what started to run away on a
buoyant ascent. He pulled the neck seal of the suit thinking that it was
that, it wasn't, he did however flood the suit. He was not able to reel
in the line fast enough on his SMB, that line then got caught round him
as he ascended reducing his ability to do much to try to sort things
out. When he surface another boat that had seen the line rapidly
appearing at the surface picked him up and freed him, he was then
transferred to our boat.

Diver Two was diving twins, he left the bottom with stops (I don't know
how much) and proceeded on a normal ascent, he got to stop depth and
stopped, completing most of his deco. With 2 mins of deco left someone
else's SMB went past him and tangled in his, he was then dragged up, he
did release his SMB, by this time however it was too late and he was on
the surface.

Hope that answers any questions.

Danny
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:40 AM
Danny Burchett
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

CAS wrote:
>>>pleased everyone is ok but

>
>
> Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
> done!
>
>
>>>Can we have a bit more information please.
>>>
>>>wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>>>away??

>>
>>City of Waterford.
>>35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
>>I don't know the run time on this individual and I
>>have been asked not to identify people but those that
>>were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
>>bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
>>all so it was a good day.

>
>
> At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
> concentrate on does for seasickness!
>
>
>>We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
>>the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
>>things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.

>
>
> I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
> to do.
>
> So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
> what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
> the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
> (says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
> wall dive yesterday...)
>
> CAS
>
>


I think the divers want to remain anonymous, so I will post the info
that I have from them.

Diver one was diving a drager dolphin SCR rebreather. His dive went
normally, with 27 mins of stops to do he fired the SMB from the bottom
(31M) and started to ascend. The ascent went as planned until about 25M
where something, the diver does not know what started to run away on a
buoyant ascent. He pulled the neck seal of the suit thinking that it was
that, it wasn't, he did however flood the suit. He was not able to reel
in the line fast enough on his SMB, that line then got caught round him
as he ascended reducing his ability to do much to try to sort things
out. When he surface another boat that had seen the line rapidly
appearing at the surface picked him up and freed him, he was then
transferred to our boat.

Diver Two was diving twins, he left the bottom with stops (I don't know
how much) and proceeded on a normal ascent, he got to stop depth and
stopped, completing most of his deco. With 2 mins of deco left someone
else's SMB went past him and tangled in his, he was then dragged up, he
did release his SMB, by this time however it was too late and he was on
the surface.

Hope that answers any questions.

Danny
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:40 AM
Danny Burchett
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

CAS wrote:
>>>pleased everyone is ok but

>
>
> Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
> done!
>
>
>>>Can we have a bit more information please.
>>>
>>>wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>>>away??

>>
>>City of Waterford.
>>35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
>>I don't know the run time on this individual and I
>>have been asked not to identify people but those that
>>were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
>>bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
>>all so it was a good day.

>
>
> At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
> concentrate on does for seasickness!
>
>
>>We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
>>the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
>>things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.

>
>
> I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
> to do.
>
> So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
> what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
> the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
> (says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
> wall dive yesterday...)
>
> CAS
>
>


I think the divers want to remain anonymous, so I will post the info
that I have from them.

Diver one was diving a drager dolphin SCR rebreather. His dive went
normally, with 27 mins of stops to do he fired the SMB from the bottom
(31M) and started to ascend. The ascent went as planned until about 25M
where something, the diver does not know what started to run away on a
buoyant ascent. He pulled the neck seal of the suit thinking that it was
that, it wasn't, he did however flood the suit. He was not able to reel
in the line fast enough on his SMB, that line then got caught round him
as he ascended reducing his ability to do much to try to sort things
out. When he surface another boat that had seen the line rapidly
appearing at the surface picked him up and freed him, he was then
transferred to our boat.

Diver Two was diving twins, he left the bottom with stops (I don't know
how much) and proceeded on a normal ascent, he got to stop depth and
stopped, completing most of his deco. With 2 mins of deco left someone
else's SMB went past him and tangled in his, he was then dragged up, he
did release his SMB, by this time however it was too late and he was on
the surface.

Hope that answers any questions.

Danny
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-04-2005, 04:40 AM
Danny Burchett
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Trip report on UKRS 132

CAS wrote:
>>>pleased everyone is ok but

>
>
> Likewise. Proper scary stuff - seems like you all got things right - well
> done!
>
>
>>>Can we have a bit more information please.
>>>
>>>wreck depth run time that sort of thing oh and what caused the run
>>>away??

>>
>>City of Waterford.
>>35m into the scour on this tide but it stands 5m tall.
>>I don't know the run time on this individual and I
>>have been asked not to identify people but those that
>>were happy with deco were doing about an hour or so
>>bottom time. 7 to 10m vis and I wasn't seasick at
>>all so it was a good day.

>
>
> At the risk of sounding flippant, its amazing what something to really
> concentrate on does for seasickness!
>
>
>>We don't know what ran away. Neither did he. He pulled
>>the neck seal and flooded the suit to try and arrest
>>things so he was trying hard. Not a UKRS regular.

>
>
> I think you would try hard if things went wrong with half an hour of stops
> to do.
>
> So very glad the outcome was the right one, well done to you all for doing
> what needed to be done and obviously doing it well. As David says, tho, if
> the divers involved want to, it would be good to know what caught them out
> (says he after being very nearly caught out by some wicked downcurrents on a
> wall dive yesterday...)
>
> CAS
>
>


I think the divers want to remain anonymous, so I will post the info
that I have from them.

Diver one was diving a drager dolphin SCR rebreather. His dive went
normally, with 27 mins of stops to do he fired the SMB from the bottom
(31M) and started to ascend. The ascent went as planned until about 25M
where something, the diver does not know what started to run away on a
buoyant ascent. He pulled the neck seal of the suit thinking that it was
that, it wasn't, he did however flood the suit. He was not able to reel
in the line fast enough on his SMB, that line then got caught round him
as he ascended reducing his ability to do much to try to sort things
out. When he surface another boat that had seen the line rapidly
appearing at the surface picked him up and freed him, he was then
transferred to our boat.

Diver Two was diving twins, he left the bottom with stops (I don't know
how much) and proceeded on a normal ascent, he got to stop depth and
stopped, completing most of his deco. With 2 mins of deco left someone
else's SMB went past him and tangled in his, he was then dragged up, he
did release his SMB, by this time however it was too late and he was on
the surface.

Hope that answers any questions.

Danny
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trip report for UKRS Littlehampton 5/6 June 2004 Pete S. United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 12 03-26-2007 11:45 PM
UKRS Scylla Trip CAS United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 22 03-26-2007 11:38 PM
UKRS pot dive report Chris Bell United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 14 03-26-2007 11:33 PM
UKRS Plymouth mini trip report Jason Trinidad and Tobago 1 03-26-2007 11:13 PM
Another UKRS trip Steve Jones United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 7 03-26-2007 11:12 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.