scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Regional Travel and Dive News > Europe > United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:11 PM
Craig Campbell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

Seems like good advice - I already have all my own kit and have just
purchased a new faber 12ltr 232 bottle.

Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a filled 3ltr
aluminium pony?

Craig Campbell

"David Walker" <stuff@scuby.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dcbdgq$cb7$1@wisteria.csv.warwick.ac.uk...
> Do you have your own basic kit already, or would you be buying it all
> together? I'd recommend getting yourself sorted with all that first,
> before looking into extra kit.
>
> What you need depends on the diving you're doing. Personally i'd ignore
> Spare Air (almost as much as a pony setup, with a volume which means any
> ascent will always have to be dangerously rapid), leaving the choice
> between pony and twins. At your level, i'd say get a pony. Theres no
> particular reason not to get twins if you decided to go that way, but a
> pony is initially lighter, easier to carry / kit up etc, and perfectly
> fine for diving to around 30-35m, which is all you'll be doing I expect
> for at least a year, maybe more. If you look at the cost of the pony,
> if/when you upgrade to twins you'll only have lost the ~£60 cost of the 3l
> cylinder, and of course you can keep that for other uses in the future.
> Helps spread the cost a bit more if you're thinking twins later.
>
> Just make sure you can justify to yourself what you're getting and why -
> don't try to future-proof yourself too far into the future, because kit
> changes, devalues, tanks need servicing, etc.
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> "Craig Campbell" <mail@craigcampbell.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dcbc16$lqo$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>I am new to diving and have just qualified as a ocean diver. I would like
>>to have a redundant air supply instead of just an octopus.
>>
>> Opinions please on which to choose and for what reason;
>> Pony, Spare Air or twinset? or just stick to buddy/octopus?
>>
>> I feel Spare Air appealing as no large tanks to cause imbalance or heavy
>> twinsets?
>>
>> Look forward to some opinions
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>

>
>



Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:11 PM
Craig Campbell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

Seems like good advice - I already have all my own kit and have just
purchased a new faber 12ltr 232 bottle.

Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a filled 3ltr
aluminium pony?

Craig Campbell

"David Walker" <stuff@scuby.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dcbdgq$cb7$1@wisteria.csv.warwick.ac.uk...
> Do you have your own basic kit already, or would you be buying it all
> together? I'd recommend getting yourself sorted with all that first,
> before looking into extra kit.
>
> What you need depends on the diving you're doing. Personally i'd ignore
> Spare Air (almost as much as a pony setup, with a volume which means any
> ascent will always have to be dangerously rapid), leaving the choice
> between pony and twins. At your level, i'd say get a pony. Theres no
> particular reason not to get twins if you decided to go that way, but a
> pony is initially lighter, easier to carry / kit up etc, and perfectly
> fine for diving to around 30-35m, which is all you'll be doing I expect
> for at least a year, maybe more. If you look at the cost of the pony,
> if/when you upgrade to twins you'll only have lost the ~£60 cost of the 3l
> cylinder, and of course you can keep that for other uses in the future.
> Helps spread the cost a bit more if you're thinking twins later.
>
> Just make sure you can justify to yourself what you're getting and why -
> don't try to future-proof yourself too far into the future, because kit
> changes, devalues, tanks need servicing, etc.
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> "Craig Campbell" <mail@craigcampbell.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dcbc16$lqo$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>I am new to diving and have just qualified as a ocean diver. I would like
>>to have a redundant air supply instead of just an octopus.
>>
>> Opinions please on which to choose and for what reason;
>> Pony, Spare Air or twinset? or just stick to buddy/octopus?
>>
>> I feel Spare Air appealing as no large tanks to cause imbalance or heavy
>> twinsets?
>>
>> Look forward to some opinions
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>

>
>



Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:25 PM
David Walker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

> Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
> minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a filled
> 3ltr aluminium pony?


I wouldn't worry about the balance, I never noticed it in the water with a
3l steel cylinder. Just make sure its mounted tightly into the BC and it
should be fine. If you do have a problem then you can put an extra kilo of
weight on the opposite side. Aluminium cylinders are harder to find, more
expensive, and I believe more difficult to get serviced too, but I may be
wrong on the last point.

David


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:25 PM
David Walker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

> Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
> minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a filled
> 3ltr aluminium pony?


I wouldn't worry about the balance, I never noticed it in the water with a
3l steel cylinder. Just make sure its mounted tightly into the BC and it
should be fine. If you do have a problem then you can put an extra kilo of
weight on the opposite side. Aluminium cylinders are harder to find, more
expensive, and I believe more difficult to get serviced too, but I may be
wrong on the last point.

David


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:25 PM
David Walker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

> Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
> minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a filled
> 3ltr aluminium pony?


I wouldn't worry about the balance, I never noticed it in the water with a
3l steel cylinder. Just make sure its mounted tightly into the BC and it
should be fine. If you do have a problem then you can put an extra kilo of
weight on the opposite side. Aluminium cylinders are harder to find, more
expensive, and I believe more difficult to get serviced too, but I may be
wrong on the last point.

David


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:25 PM
David Walker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

> Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
> minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a filled
> 3ltr aluminium pony?


I wouldn't worry about the balance, I never noticed it in the water with a
3l steel cylinder. Just make sure its mounted tightly into the BC and it
should be fine. If you do have a problem then you can put an extra kilo of
weight on the opposite side. Aluminium cylinders are harder to find, more
expensive, and I believe more difficult to get serviced too, but I may be
wrong on the last point.

David


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:25 PM
David Walker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

> Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
> minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a filled
> 3ltr aluminium pony?


I wouldn't worry about the balance, I never noticed it in the water with a
3l steel cylinder. Just make sure its mounted tightly into the BC and it
should be fine. If you do have a problem then you can put an extra kilo of
weight on the opposite side. Aluminium cylinders are harder to find, more
expensive, and I believe more difficult to get serviced too, but I may be
wrong on the last point.

David


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:25 PM
David Walker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

> Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
> minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a filled
> 3ltr aluminium pony?


I wouldn't worry about the balance, I never noticed it in the water with a
3l steel cylinder. Just make sure its mounted tightly into the BC and it
should be fine. If you do have a problem then you can put an extra kilo of
weight on the opposite side. Aluminium cylinders are harder to find, more
expensive, and I believe more difficult to get serviced too, but I may be
wrong on the last point.

David


Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:39 PM
Nigel Hewitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

Craig Campbell wrote:
> Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
> minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a
> filled 3ltr aluminium pony?


Steel and Ali cylinders weigh about the same as it takes more Ali
to contain the pressure. I'd go for steel personally but others
may differ.

Either cylinder will make no significant differance to your
weight as empty they will be about neutral with the Ali slightly
more buoyant in the water so with regs and a gauge still less
than a kilo negative empty.

I like ponys. Yes, it is important not to think it is big because
if you pant you can get through it quickly but it contains as
much as the 50 bar reserve in a 12L and if you have another reg
to stuff in your mouth when something goes wrong you are less
likely to panic and suffer elevated breathing rates.

I hope you have a lot of fun together and never have to use it.

nigelH



Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-28-2005, 04:39 PM
Nigel Hewitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Choice of redundant air supply

Craig Campbell wrote:
> Should I go for an aluminium 3ltr pony to keep weight to a minimum to
> minimise imbalance, does anybody know what weight would be in a
> filled 3ltr aluminium pony?


Steel and Ali cylinders weigh about the same as it takes more Ali
to contain the pressure. I'd go for steel personally but others
may differ.

Either cylinder will make no significant differance to your
weight as empty they will be about neutral with the Ali slightly
more buoyant in the water so with regs and a gauge still less
than a kilo negative empty.

I like ponys. Yes, it is important not to think it is big because
if you pant you can get through it quickly but it contains as
much as the 50 bar reserve in a 12L and if you have another reg
to stuff in your mouth when something goes wrong you are less
likely to panic and suffer elevated breathing rates.

I hope you have a lot of fun together and never have to use it.

nigelH



Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drysuit choice? padeen Gear 0 03-27-2007 02:41 AM
Now a couple of questions regarding my choice in BC... Tao Of The Dive Gear 9 03-27-2007 01:01 AM
Drysuit Choice? padeen Divers Hangout 0 03-26-2007 08:07 PM
Camera Choice rick_hughes@btconnect.com United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 8 10-01-2005 05:28 PM
New Mask choice rick_hughes@btconnect.com United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 72 09-27-2005 03:14 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 PM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.