scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Regional Travel and Dive News > Europe > United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:37 AM
Nigel Hewitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

DaveA <dave_appleby@yahoo.com> wrote:

> .....I could have been in
> serious problems had I gone into deco with no contents or depth
> readings.


You would go into deco without backup depth readings?

You are a braver man than I am.

I used to have two contents gauges on the twinset too.

nigelH


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:37 AM
Nigel Hewitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

DaveA <dave_appleby@yahoo.com> wrote:

> .....I could have been in
> serious problems had I gone into deco with no contents or depth
> readings.


You would go into deco without backup depth readings?

You are a braver man than I am.

I used to have two contents gauges on the twinset too.

nigelH


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:37 AM
Nigel Hewitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

DaveA <dave_appleby@yahoo.com> wrote:

> .....I could have been in
> serious problems had I gone into deco with no contents or depth
> readings.


You would go into deco without backup depth readings?

You are a braver man than I am.

I used to have two contents gauges on the twinset too.

nigelH


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:37 AM
Nigel Hewitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

DaveA <dave_appleby@yahoo.com> wrote:

> .....I could have been in
> serious problems had I gone into deco with no contents or depth
> readings.


You would go into deco without backup depth readings?

You are a braver man than I am.

I used to have two contents gauges on the twinset too.

nigelH


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:50 AM
DaveA
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

Nigel,

The emphisis was on 'had I'

I did have my old Octopus II as a backup timer / depth gauge.

The idea wasn't to do a deco dive, however more of a 'what if'
scenario.

Ben,

Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.

Scubapro have said it sounds like a TX failure throwing erronious
tank readings therefore the unit shuts down. Given the 57% on the
battery it was 'unlikely' to be that.

I was quite surprised to be told to take it back to a dealer who'd
upgrade to
an Air-Z for £95.00 and if I wanted to be on the 'safe' side they's
replace the
TX for an additional £57.50. The second part there surprised me given
that the first suspected fail point WAS the TX.

All in all

They just seemed to show no interest in why the unit failed. As they no
longer support the Air-X the upgrade was on the cards anyway. I just
thought they'd show a little more interest in why it failed in the way
it did.

Thanks for the replies so far.

DaveA

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:50 AM
DaveA
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

Nigel,

The emphisis was on 'had I'

I did have my old Octopus II as a backup timer / depth gauge.

The idea wasn't to do a deco dive, however more of a 'what if'
scenario.

Ben,

Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.

Scubapro have said it sounds like a TX failure throwing erronious
tank readings therefore the unit shuts down. Given the 57% on the
battery it was 'unlikely' to be that.

I was quite surprised to be told to take it back to a dealer who'd
upgrade to
an Air-Z for £95.00 and if I wanted to be on the 'safe' side they's
replace the
TX for an additional £57.50. The second part there surprised me given
that the first suspected fail point WAS the TX.

All in all

They just seemed to show no interest in why the unit failed. As they no
longer support the Air-X the upgrade was on the cards anyway. I just
thought they'd show a little more interest in why it failed in the way
it did.

Thanks for the replies so far.

DaveA

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:50 AM
DaveA
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

Nigel,

The emphisis was on 'had I'

I did have my old Octopus II as a backup timer / depth gauge.

The idea wasn't to do a deco dive, however more of a 'what if'
scenario.

Ben,

Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.

Scubapro have said it sounds like a TX failure throwing erronious
tank readings therefore the unit shuts down. Given the 57% on the
battery it was 'unlikely' to be that.

I was quite surprised to be told to take it back to a dealer who'd
upgrade to
an Air-Z for £95.00 and if I wanted to be on the 'safe' side they's
replace the
TX for an additional £57.50. The second part there surprised me given
that the first suspected fail point WAS the TX.

All in all

They just seemed to show no interest in why the unit failed. As they no
longer support the Air-X the upgrade was on the cards anyway. I just
thought they'd show a little more interest in why it failed in the way
it did.

Thanks for the replies so far.

DaveA

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:50 AM
DaveA
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

Nigel,

The emphisis was on 'had I'

I did have my old Octopus II as a backup timer / depth gauge.

The idea wasn't to do a deco dive, however more of a 'what if'
scenario.

Ben,

Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.

Scubapro have said it sounds like a TX failure throwing erronious
tank readings therefore the unit shuts down. Given the 57% on the
battery it was 'unlikely' to be that.

I was quite surprised to be told to take it back to a dealer who'd
upgrade to
an Air-Z for £95.00 and if I wanted to be on the 'safe' side they's
replace the
TX for an additional £57.50. The second part there surprised me given
that the first suspected fail point WAS the TX.

All in all

They just seemed to show no interest in why the unit failed. As they no
longer support the Air-X the upgrade was on the cards anyway. I just
thought they'd show a little more interest in why it failed in the way
it did.

Thanks for the replies so far.

DaveA

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:50 AM
DaveA
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

Nigel,

The emphisis was on 'had I'

I did have my old Octopus II as a backup timer / depth gauge.

The idea wasn't to do a deco dive, however more of a 'what if'
scenario.

Ben,

Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.

Scubapro have said it sounds like a TX failure throwing erronious
tank readings therefore the unit shuts down. Given the 57% on the
battery it was 'unlikely' to be that.

I was quite surprised to be told to take it back to a dealer who'd
upgrade to
an Air-Z for £95.00 and if I wanted to be on the 'safe' side they's
replace the
TX for an additional £57.50. The second part there surprised me given
that the first suspected fail point WAS the TX.

All in all

They just seemed to show no interest in why the unit failed. As they no
longer support the Air-X the upgrade was on the cards anyway. I just
thought they'd show a little more interest in why it failed in the way
it did.

Thanks for the replies so far.

DaveA

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-24-2005, 06:50 AM
DaveA
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aladin Air-X Failure

Nigel,

The emphisis was on 'had I'

I did have my old Octopus II as a backup timer / depth gauge.

The idea wasn't to do a deco dive, however more of a 'what if'
scenario.

Ben,

Battery is a possibility it was reading 57%.

Scubapro have said it sounds like a TX failure throwing erronious
tank readings therefore the unit shuts down. Given the 57% on the
battery it was 'unlikely' to be that.

I was quite surprised to be told to take it back to a dealer who'd
upgrade to
an Air-Z for £95.00 and if I wanted to be on the 'safe' side they's
replace the
TX for an additional £57.50. The second part there surprised me given
that the first suspected fail point WAS the TX.

All in all

They just seemed to show no interest in why the unit failed. As they no
longer support the Air-X the upgrade was on the cards anyway. I just
thought they'd show a little more interest in why it failed in the way
it did.

Thanks for the replies so far.

DaveA

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aladdin failure. Paul United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 2 03-27-2007 12:36 AM
Bush admits failure in Iraq, but blames it on Rummy. RecScubaPoster Iraq 1 03-26-2007 10:06 PM
Re: Fallout from WMD search failure pugetsounddiver@gmail.com Divers Hangout 0 03-26-2007 12:47 PM
Failure Jammer Six Divers Hangout 2 03-26-2007 12:47 PM
OT - MOT Emissions failure rads United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 36 09-22-2006 06:13 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 PM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.