Re: maximun depth underwater case ?

On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:40:08 -0700, marmagi wrote:

> Hello,
>
> My CANON Ixus 700 digital underwater housing case DC70 says maximun
> depth 40 meters, how much more deep you think I can take this housing?
No deeper.
>
> I have taken it up to 45 meters and it work didnt flooded.
It wouldn't as by that time it was still in air.
>
> I need to know since I am planning to go deeper.
Get a housing guaranteed to go deeper.
>
> Please let me know if any of you have tried
Why would anyone be so silly?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mario

--
Neil
Delete l to reply

With PADI, the advanced open water allows you to the 30 metre mark, with the
Deep diver course this takes you down to the 40 metre mark.

If you want to go beyond this, you have to start looking at specialist
courses - i.e. TDI (I'm sure there are others, but I have only done TDI)

The advanced decompression diver allows you to plan and dive to 45 meters,
and the extended range up to 60 meters. Beyond this depth you will be
looking at tri-mix diving.

the max I have dived is 52 meters, and this was with a twin set & a stage
bottle for the deco stops. For the first few dives at the 40/50 metre mark
the camera did not go with me, as there is the small task of task loading -
try not to have too many things to think about on each dive as this can add
to the stress levels.

Just remember to enjoy your diving, and stay within the level of your
qualifications.

Ian



"poddys" <Poddys@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155213704.914820.247350@q16g2000cwq.googlegr oups.com...
> Isn't the recommended depth for sport diving around 100 feet (under 35
> metres), so either you are all taking great risks in going so deep, or
> you are in a profession where you have special equipment / breathing
> gear that allows this.
>
> In that case, wouldn't you be able to justify a better housing for the
> camera that is warranteed for that depth?
>
> Just a thought.............
>

poddys <Poddys@gmail.com> wrote:

> Isn't the recommended depth for sport diving around 100 feet (under 35
> metres), so either you are all taking great risks in going so deep, or
> you are in a profession where you have special equipment / breathing
> gear that allows this.

This is cross-posted to all sorts of groups and many of us think
that 40m and below is normal because that's where the interesting
things to see are.

Anyway... I like my equipment to be certified for deeper than me
then I only have to worry about me.

nigelH



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"poddys" <Poddys@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155213704.914820.247350@q16g2000cwq.googlegr oups.com...
> Isn't the recommended depth for sport diving around 100 feet (under 35
> metres), so either you are all taking great risks in going so deep, or
> you are in a profession where you have special equipment / breathing
> gear that allows this.
>
> In that case, wouldn't you be able to justify a better housing for the
> camera that is warranteed for that depth?
>
> Just a thought.............
>
I bought the camera before I knew there was even a housing available for it.
When I started diving with the camera and housing (generally shore dives
under 60' max depth) it was adequate. At the current time, the camera isn't
worth much anyway and if I lose it due to the housing leaking, I'll just get
that new camera I've been putting off buying. Hence, taking it to the Blue
Hole wasn't a big concern - if it flooded, so be it. It didn't and still
works fine so I guess I'll have to look for another excuse to buy a new one.

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:50:39 -0400, Dan Bracuk <bracuk@pathcom.com>
wrote:

>"Nigel Hewitt" <nigelhewitt@hotmail.co.uk> pounded away at his
>keyboard resulting in:
>
>:This is cross-posted to all sorts of groups and many of us think
>:that 40m and below is normal because that's where the interesting
>:things to see are.
>
>Different strokes for different folks. I think 40 ft and up is much
>more interesting than deep and dark.
>
>Dan Bracuk
>If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure.
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Me too Dan. However I had a cool experience spear fishing at 100' 25
miles off of Daytona. I stabbed a gray trigger fish and while I was
wrestling him into to my bag I noticed this neon green stuff wafting
out of the holes that the paralyzer tip made. Lighting the fish up
with my little lamp quickly identified the substance as blood. I
thought I'd got ET there for a moment. Yuk Yuk.

Same place. There were millions of sand dollars on the shelf reef
(lack of a better term). The black ones were alive and the white ones
were dead.

GOT TO TAKE A LIGHT for deep. Of course I knew that (now let's sing
together) "For PADI told me so......".

M McDowell wrote:
> With PADI, the advanced open water allows you to the 30 metre mark, with the
> Deep diver course this takes you down to the 40 metre mark.
>
> If you want to go beyond this, you have to start looking at specialist
> courses - i.e. TDI (I'm sure there are others, but I have only done TDI)

several errors here:

you can dive to any depth you want any time you want,
with any rating you want.
padi is selling ratings, and imposes arbitrary limits on you
unless you buy another course..

use good judgment about what you do and where you do it.
think, learn, and understand before you do things.
your life depends on it.
your life does not depend on any padi rating.

Dan Bracuk wrote:

> "Nigel Hewitt" pounded away at his keyboard resulting in:
>
>> This is cross-posted to all sorts of groups and many of us think
>> that 40m and below is normal because that's where the interesting
>> things to see are.
>
> Different strokes for different folks. I think 40 ft and up is much
> more interesting than deep and dark.

If you're into fish and stuff that's true as the majority of life needs
the light to florish but I came to scuba from archeology and the more
intact stuff and the unknown, unidentified, undocumented wrecks are
deeper so that's where I like to go. My camera is my recording device
so it has to work at max depth and my 40m Olympus housing has run at 60m
although I have had buttons stick in and need to be pulled back (which
is a bitch in 7mm gloves).

I can't advise how deep a case will go because although you can be
pretty confident down to the rated depth you don't know what will give
first below that. I have accepted that one day I will bring home a case
full of seawater containing electronic scrap and the priority then will
be to rescue the card with anything from that day. The camera itself
was expensive when I bought it but once it went out of fashion I
discovered I could get 'as new' on ebay for a quarter the origonal
price so I have some spares.

nigelH



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

bob crownfield wrote:
> M McDowell wrote:
>
>> With PADI, the advanced open water allows you to the 30 metre mark,
>> with the Deep diver course this takes you down to the 40 metre mark.
>>
>> If you want to go beyond this, you have to start looking at specialist
>> courses - i.e. TDI (I'm sure there are others, but I have only done TDI)
>
>
> several errors here:
>
> you can dive to any depth you want any time you want,
> with any rating you want.
> padi is selling ratings, and imposes arbitrary limits on you
> unless you buy another course..
>
> use good judgment about what you do and where you do it.
> think, learn, and understand before you do things.
> your life depends on it.
> your life does not depend on any padi rating.
The PADI ratings reflect the training you get more than what you
can/can't do.. Unless you're an avid diver (geek-like in your research)
or a career diver, you won't get the experience required to hit the
deeper marks without some sort of training..

We've had guys die in under 10 ft of water because they were stupid
(local Dive community, Victoria BC) whereas ships divers (navy) get so
much training it's stupid..


But like the man said; use your head; your life (and likely that of your
diving partner) depends on it..

P.

Philippe wrote

> The PADI ratings reflect the training you get more than what you can/can't
> do.

You mean the training you were supposed to get and the skills you were
supposed to master, right?

> Unless you're an avid diver (geek-like in your research) or a career
> diver, you won't get the experience required to hit the deeper marks
> without some sort of training.

I guess that includes most of us. Since we're not, for the most part,
career divers, I suppose we must be geek-like. Strange, I don't recall ever
considering myself geek-like.

> But like the man said; use your head; your life (and likely that of your
> diving partner) depends on it..

Yep.