Re: Thousands stage anti-war protest

"Joe English" <joeenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
news:5a42e$4338849f$ce504822$24118@allthenewsgroup s.com...

>> -Kellerman AL, Rivara FP, Somes G, et al. "Suicide in the Home in
>> Relation to Gun Ownership." NEJM. 1992; 327(7):467-472)
>>
>
> Please cite credible sources not those from HGA
>
> And OH, Barry, Don't fuck around with the US Constituion

He's NL Barry, not OH Barry.

Why isn't the New England Journal of Medicine credible? Doesn't everyone
love and respect doctors?

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Nz0_e.57$Q34.1829@news.uswest.net...
>
> "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> news:Rt0_e.553975$5V4.245677@pd7tw3no...
> >
> > "Joe English" <joeenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
> > news:f267b$43389159$ce504822$24676@allthenewsgroup s.com...
> > > >
> > > > stitches, just keeps me in stitches
> > > >
> > > >
> > > hope they get infected!
> >
> > Nice.
>
> What do you expect?

:^)

Forgot you aren't reading me again, hunh?

> You take joy in slinging thinly veiled insult and expect roses in return?

"Who's your daddy?"

"chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
news:Rt0_e.553975$5V4.245677@pd7tw3no...
>
> "Joe English" <joeenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
> news:f267b$43389159$ce504822$24676@allthenewsgroup s.com...
> > >
> > > stitches, just keeps me in stitches
> > >
> > >
> > hope they get infected!
>
> Nice.

What do you expect?

You take joy in slinging thinly veiled insult and expect roses in return?

"chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
news:yQ0_e.266151$Hk.32106@pd7tw1no...

> :^)
>
> Forgot you aren't reading me again, hunh?

Oh no, I let you out on purpose.

As per your wishes.

> > You take joy in slinging thinly veiled insult and expect roses in
return?
>
> "Who's your daddy?"

Unlike you, I dont have a "daddy" and if I did, I wouldnt have to pay him.

I have a father and a dad.

Sorry you dont have the luck I do in having two paternal influences that are
really excellent and outstanding men.

More of the cheap shots from the Queen of Cheap Shots.

Read that .pdf I sent yet?

Scott wrote:

> "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> news:Rt0_e.553975$5V4.245677@pd7tw3no...
>
>>"Joe English" <joeenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
>>news:f267b$43389159$ce504822$24676@allthenewsgro ups.com...
>>
>>>>stitches, just keeps me in stitches
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>hope they get infected!
>>
>>Nice.
>
>
> What do you expect?
>
> You take joy in slinging thinly veiled insult and expect roses in return?
>
>
Nice snipe, Chilly

"Joe English" <joeenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
news:cdb68$43389cc3$ce504822$9235@allthenewsgroups .com...

> > Why isn't the New England Journal of Medicine credible? Doesn't
everyone
> > love and respect doctors?
>
> They really don't cite reliable fact or figures - but then you knew that
> Greg.

And we all know how much lawyers love doctors;

Without them, ambulance chasers wouldnt have jobs.

> Very selective figures

Pure bullshit.

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:F_0_e.91$hp6.13964@news.uswest.net...
>
> "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> news:yQ0_e.266151$Hk.32106@pd7tw1no...
>
> > :^)
> >
> > Forgot you aren't reading me again, hunh?
>
> Oh no, I let you out on purpose.
>
> As per your wishes.

My wishes? You mean where you said you'd never speak to me again and I said
"good". Those wishes?

LOL.

Joe English wrote:
> BarryNL wrote:
>
>> BarryNL wrote:
>>
>>> Lee Bell wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Greg Mossman" wrote
>>>>
>>>> The gun nuts are clearly afraid of violence, at least that seems to
>>>> be the perception of the anti gun faction. To hear people like you
>>>> talk, that's the only rational reason they keep and bear arms. It's
>>>> unfair to send people who are afraid into harms way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Out of interest (and I don't know the answer to this though I would
>>> bet money) do more gun owners or non-gun owners end up getting shot?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ah, here we go...
>>
>> A gun in the home increases the risk of homicide of a household member
>> by 3 times and the risk of suicide by 5 times compared to homes where
>> no gun is present.
>>
>> -Kellerman AL, Rivara FP, Somes G, et al. "Suicide in the Home in
>> Relation to Gun Ownership." NEJM. 1992; 327(7):467-472)
>>
>
> Please cite credible sources not those from HGA
>
> And OH, Barry, Don't fuck around with the US Constituion

Yep, that right to bear arms stuff is as relevant today as when it was
written huh? I mean OK the government has nuclear missiles and F-16's
now, but you can still defend against government abuse of power with
your 9mm, huh?

--
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from
him. An investment in Knowledge always pays the best Interest." -
Benjamin Franklin

Joe English wrote:
> BarryNL wrote:
>
>> Lee Bell wrote:
>>
>>> "Greg Mossman" wrote
>>>
>>> The gun nuts are clearly afraid of violence, at least that seems to
>>> be the perception of the anti gun faction. To hear people like you
>>> talk, that's the only rational reason they keep and bear arms. It's
>>> unfair to send people who are afraid into harms way.
>>
>>
>>
>> Out of interest (and I don't know the answer to this though I would
>> bet money) do more gun owners or non-gun owners end up getting shot?
>
>
> it depends, if a gun owner is committing a crime at a gunowners home the
> the violating gunowner get shot
>
> if a non gunowner commits a crime at a gunowners home then the non
> gunowner gets shot. In either case the law abiding gun owner wins
>
> OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS GREAT!

What does it have to do with using guns against criminals in your home?

--
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from
him. An investment in Knowledge always pays the best Interest." -
Benjamin Franklin

BarryNL wrote:
> Joe English wrote:
>
>> BarryNL wrote:
>>
>>> BarryNL wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lee Bell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Greg Mossman" wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> The gun nuts are clearly afraid of violence, at least that seems to
>>>>> be the perception of the anti gun faction. To hear people like you
>>>>> talk, that's the only rational reason they keep and bear arms.
>>>>> It's unfair to send people who are afraid into harms way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Out of interest (and I don't know the answer to this though I would
>>>> bet money) do more gun owners or non-gun owners end up getting shot?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, here we go...
>>>
>>> A gun in the home increases the risk of homicide of a household
>>> member by 3 times and the risk of suicide by 5 times compared to
>>> homes where no gun is present.
>>>
>>> -Kellerman AL, Rivara FP, Somes G, et al. "Suicide in the Home in
>>> Relation to Gun Ownership." NEJM. 1992; 327(7):467-472)
>>>
>>
>> Please cite credible sources not those from HGA
>>
>> And OH, Barry, Don't fuck around with the US Constituion
>
>
> Yep, that right to bear arms stuff is as relevant today as when it was
> written huh? I mean OK the government has nuclear missiles and F-16's
> now, but you can still defend against government abuse of power with
> your 9mm, huh?
>
f-16's and nuclear missiles cannot occupy a country nor levy taxes.


--
“No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy”
Sun Tzu