scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Regional Travel and Dive News > North America > USA
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-26-2006, 02:17 PM
CB - aka Unfrozen Caveman Politician Algore
 
Posts: n/a
Default Offshore Drilling Bill Advances in Senate - Good for America, good for the fish and good for fishermen/Spearos

Offshore Drilling Bill Advances in Senate

By H. JOSEF HEBERT | Associated Press Writer
Posted July 26, 2006, 11:16 AM EDT
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...home-headlines

WASHINGTON -- The Senate began work Wednesday on an election-year bill that
would open a large area of the central Gulf of Mexico to oil and gas
drilling, but would fall far short of a broader offshore energy development
measure already approved by the House.

By a vote of 86-12 the Senate agreed to proceed with the legislation that
opponents fear could open the way to lifting a federal drilling moratorium
that has protected 85 percent of the country's Outer Continental Shelf from
New England to Alaska for a quarter century.


It directs the Interior Department to begin offering oil and gas leases for
waters known as Lease Area 181, which lies 125 miles to 230 miles off
Florida's coast. The bill would guarantee that much of Florida's Gulf coast
would be protected from drilling until 2022.

Covering 8.3 million acres, the Lease Area 181 and an adjacent area together
covers 8.3 million acres and is believed to contain 1.3 billion barrels of
oil and 5.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, enough to heat 6 million
homes for 15 years. The area has been off limits to development largely
because of concerns from Florida that drilling could jeopardize its beaches
and lucrative tourist industry.

Despite the wide margin on what was viewed as largely a procedural vote
Wednesday, the bill's supporters said passage will be difficult. Senate GOP
leaders were trying to limit any changes in the compromise legislation,
fearing that might jeopardize passage.

Already, the legislation is likely to attract a filibuster from opponents.
No final vote was likely before Monday as the Senate moves toward its summer
recess next week .

"It's clear that anything that changes this very much won't pass the
Senate," Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., the bill's chief sponsor and floor
leader, told reporters.

Some opponents of the legislation fear it's a first step to lifting a
moratorium that for decades has prohibited drilling in 85 percent of the
country's coastal waters from New England to Alaska. Others object to
changes in revenue sharing in the legislation that would sharply increase
money funneled to four Gulf states -- Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi and
Texas -- that already have offshore energy development.

A month ago, the House passed a much broader offshore energy development
bill that would lift the ban on oil and gas drilling that has been in effect
for 25 years in most waters outside the western Gulf of Mexico. That bill
would still bar drilling within 50 miles of the shoreline, but it would open
waters beyond that to energy companies unless a state specifically acts to
protect waters within 100 miles of shore.

Senate Republican leaders said they didn't have enough votes to push such a
broad measure through the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist,
R-Tenn., said Tuesday that if the bill passes he would work to keep it
focused and limited to the 8.3 million acres in negotiations with the House.

That may be hard to do.

Rep. Richard Pombo, R-Calif., a key sponsor of the House bill passed last
month, said Tuesday he saw no way the House would accept the limited Senate
legislation as a substitute for its bill.

Another key player on energy issues in the House, Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas,
said Wednesday he looked forward the Senate passing its bill and to
negotiations to resolve differences, but added: "We would certainly
encourage (the Senate) to go broader" beyond the central Gulf.

Domenici argued that the additional oil and gas found in Lease Area 181
could "bring enough oil and gas to market to ease supply constraints and
stabilize energy prices." He has said the offshore drilling measure is
likely to be the only energy legislation that has a chance to emerge from
Congress this year.

But the bill has its own political pitfalls. Senators from many coastal
states worry about potential oil spills that could harm beaches and
jeopardize tourist industries.

Several senators said they want to include a guarantee that the
long-standing moratorium remain in place along the Pacific and Atlantic
coasts until 2022. It is now approved by Congress annually. The bill gives
such assurance for Florida's Gulf waters.

The legislation funnels tens of millions of additional dollars in royalties
to Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama that already have drilling rigs
off their coasts. These states would get 37.5 percent of future royalties
from oil or gas taken from federally controlled waters, compared with less
than 2 percent today.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., opposes the measure largely because, he said,
"over the next 60 years this entitlement to the Gulf Coast states would have
a total value of at least $170 billion."

The administration also has objected to the revenue changes. Energy
Secretary Samuel Bodman said Wednesday he is pleased with "the general
direction" of the bill, but that the administration still has concern about
the revenue sharing changes.
--
CB
What put's Algore in his lockbox?
http://home.austarnet.com.au/yours/G...%20Problem.gif



Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good Tock Italy 3 03-26-2007 07:21 PM
Re: Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good John Mara Italy 0 03-26-2007 07:16 PM
Re: Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good Lee Bell Italy 1 03-26-2007 07:15 PM
Re: Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good Chris Guynn Italy 0 03-26-2007 07:15 PM
Offshore Drilling Bill Advances in Senate - Good for America, good for the fish and good for fishermen/Spearos CB - aka Unfrozen Caveman Politician Algore Vacation ideas 8 07-27-2006 01:50 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.