|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Lee Bell wrote: >> I [nospam@all.please.net] took issue with >> what he wrote. > > You took issue with part of what he wrote. > Lee I only took issue with a part that was wrong. Why would I take issue with a part that was correct? Oh, wait... I see your trouble now. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| nospam@all.please.net wrote >> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > I only took issue with a part that was wrong. > Why would I take issue with a part that was > correct? Because it was part of the same sentence, the part that made your issue moot. The KKK used to do a very nice job of proving the inferiority of others using out of context quotes from the Bible. They weren't right either. Lee |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| nospam@all.please.net wrote >> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > I only took issue with a part that was wrong. > Why would I take issue with a part that was > correct? Because it was part of the same sentence, the part that made your issue moot. The KKK used to do a very nice job of proving the inferiority of others using out of context quotes from the Bible. They weren't right either. Lee |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| nospam@all.please.net wrote >> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > I only took issue with a part that was wrong. > Why would I take issue with a part that was > correct? Because it was part of the same sentence, the part that made your issue moot. The KKK used to do a very nice job of proving the inferiority of others using out of context quotes from the Bible. They weren't right either. Lee |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| nospam@all.please.net wrote >> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > I only took issue with a part that was wrong. > Why would I take issue with a part that was > correct? Because it was part of the same sentence, the part that made your issue moot. The KKK used to do a very nice job of proving the inferiority of others using out of context quotes from the Bible. They weren't right either. Lee |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:08:55 -0500, Lee Bell wrote: > nospam@all.please.net wrote > >>> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > >> I only took issue with a part that was wrong. >> Why would I take issue with a part that was >> correct? > > Because it was part of the same sentence, the part that made your issue > moot. > In your "reality" a sentence can be both true and false. Have you heard of the Law of the Excluded Middle? > The KKK used to do a very nice job of proving the inferiority of others > using out of context quotes from the Bible. They weren't right either. I made no "Appeal to Authority." Try again. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:08:55 -0500, Lee Bell wrote: > nospam@all.please.net wrote > >>> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > >> I only took issue with a part that was wrong. >> Why would I take issue with a part that was >> correct? > > Because it was part of the same sentence, the part that made your issue > moot. > In your "reality" a sentence can be both true and false. Have you heard of the Law of the Excluded Middle? > The KKK used to do a very nice job of proving the inferiority of others > using out of context quotes from the Bible. They weren't right either. I made no "Appeal to Authority." Try again. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:08:55 -0500, Lee Bell wrote: > nospam@all.please.net wrote > >>> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > >> I only took issue with a part that was wrong. >> Why would I take issue with a part that was >> correct? > > Because it was part of the same sentence, the part that made your issue > moot. > In your "reality" a sentence can be both true and false. Have you heard of the Law of the Excluded Middle? > The KKK used to do a very nice job of proving the inferiority of others > using out of context quotes from the Bible. They weren't right either. I made no "Appeal to Authority." Try again. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:08:55 -0500, Lee Bell wrote: > nospam@all.please.net wrote > >>> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > >> I only took issue with a part that was wrong. >> Why would I take issue with a part that was >> correct? > > Because it was part of the same sentence, the part that made your issue > moot. > In your "reality" a sentence can be both true and false. Have you heard of the Law of the Excluded Middle? > The KKK used to do a very nice job of proving the inferiority of others > using out of context quotes from the Bible. They weren't right either. I made no "Appeal to Authority." Try again. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:08:55 -0500, Lee Bell wrote: > nospam@all.please.net wrote > >>> You took issue with part of what he wrote. > >> I only took issue with a part that was wrong. > The KKK used to > > Lee See also: Red Herring. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Naples Florida - diving | nospam@all.please.net | USA | 0 | 11-06-2006 06:43 PM |
| Naples Florida - diving | Paul K. Lathrop | USA | 109 | 11-06-2006 04:25 PM |
| Naples Florida - diving | Paul K. Lathrop | USA | 0 | 11-03-2006 03:51 PM |
| Naples Florida - diving | Paul K. Lathrop | USA | 0 | 11-03-2006 03:51 PM |
| Naples Florida - diving | Paul K. Lathrop | USA | 0 | 11-03-2006 03:51 PM |