Congratulations America!

Carl Nisarel wrote:

>
> It's hiliarious to watch you fuckwits demonstrate your ignorance.


DAMN!!!! look what crawled out the binary dumpster.
and still just as big a fool as he always has been.

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:30:14 -0800, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com>
wrote:

>I almost didn't post this because I didn't want to gloat. But I changed my
>mind.
>
>It's a beautiful morning. Long Live Speaker Pelosi!
>

There's even more good news for you; Daniel Ortega got elected.

GWB napisal(a):
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:30:14 -0800, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I almost didn't post this because I didn't want to gloat. But I changed my
> >mind.
> >
> >It's a beautiful morning. Long Live Speaker Pelosi!
> >
>
> There's even more good news for you; Daniel Ortega got elected.

And Donald Rumsfeld fired

James Connell wrote:
> Carl Nisarel wrote:
>
> >
> > It's hiliarious to watch you fuckwits demonstrate your ignorance.
>
>
> DAMN!!!! look what crawled out the binary dumpster.
> and still just as big a fool as he always has been.

Nah, he's just a pissed off Republican.

James Connell wrote:
> Carl Nisarel wrote:
>
>>
>> It's hiliarious to watch you fuckwits demonstrate your ignorance.
>
>
> DAMN!!!! look what crawled out the binary dumpster.
> and still just as big a fool as he always has been.


The funny thing is he's mistaking having a job, and not being able to
sit in our basement watching the poll results roll in as "ignorance".

Bryan

janusz_w@hotmail.com wrote:
> GWB napisal(a):
>
>>On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:30:14 -0800, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I almost didn't post this because I didn't want to gloat. But I changed my
>>>mind.
>>>
>>>It's a beautiful morning. Long Live Speaker Pelosi!
>>>
>>
>>There's even more good news for you; Daniel Ortega got elected.
>
>
> And Donald Rumsfeld fired
>
uh no, resigned

Scott napisal(a):
> "RecScubaPoster" <recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1163040649.403982.98870@h54g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
>
> > Why aren't you in Iraq yet Big Boy?
>
> Better reason than you arent;
>
> He tried.

Failed IQ test? Lie detector? Weight standards?

>
> You were busy with laundry and dishes.

rec.scuba's resident pussy "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> whined:

>> Should we be impressed?
>
> Absolutely not.

Just like your hero, John Lott.

From Lott's web site:

"Here are my election predictions. The Republicans are going to keep the
House and the Senate. My guess is that the Republicans will lose 12
seats in the House and no more than 1 in the Senate. I would not be
surprised that Republicans break even or even pick up one seat in the
Senate. I think that Republicans will lose Ohio, but could pick up
Michigan and even more likely Maryland. A Steele in Maryland win will
make the evening a great one all by itself."


<snicker>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:08:42 -0800, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com>
wrote:

>"Bryan Heit" <bjheit@NOSPAMucalgary.ca> wrote in message
>news:eit9gi$l58$1@news.ucalgary.ca...
>
>> CNN is reporting things differently. They have 51 seats for the dems, 49
>> for the repubs, and 0 independents.
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate/
>>
>> Not sure why there's a discrepancy.
>
>It's 49 R, 50 D right now. Virginia will be up in the air for a while
>unless the incumbent macaca concedes. He's about 8,000 votes behind, so
>Allen must be hoping for a lot of dangling chads.
>
>The reason for the 0 independents is because independents aren't really
>independent. They just say they are to stand out from the crowd. They're
>really democrats in disguise, so CNN simply counts them as democrats.
>
>

Pretty untrue Greg, most of us are independent because both base
parties make us sick. If we have to split the ticket every time we
vote, why affiliate ourselves with the lessor of two losers ?

"Rod" <log_dog@verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:45532e33.87136437@news.verizon.net...
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:08:42 -0800, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com>
> wrote:
>
> >"Bryan Heit" <bjheit@NOSPAMucalgary.ca> wrote in message
> >news:eit9gi$l58$1@news.ucalgary.ca...
> >
> >> CNN is reporting things differently. They have 51 seats for the dems,
49
> >> for the repubs, and 0 independents.
> >>
> >> http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate/
> >>
> >> Not sure why there's a discrepancy.
> >
> >It's 49 R, 50 D right now. Virginia will be up in the air for a while
> >unless the incumbent macaca concedes. He's about 8,000 votes behind, so
> >Allen must be hoping for a lot of dangling chads.
> >
> >The reason for the 0 independents is because independents aren't really
> >independent. They just say they are to stand out from the crowd.
They're
> >really democrats in disguise, so CNN simply counts them as democrats.
> >
> >
>
> Pretty untrue Greg, most of us are independent because both base
> parties make us sick. If we have to split the ticket every time we
> vote, why affiliate ourselves with the lessor of two losers ?

Uhmm...Greg was talking specifically about the independents in the House and
Senate.
Lieberman ran as an independent, but said he's caucus with the Democrats.

Lieberman ran as an independent solely becausse he lost the primary and was
unwilling to accept that result.
And the people of Connecticut agreed with his decision.

Dennis