Congratulations America!

"Bryan Heit" <bjheit@NOSPAMucalgary.ca> wrote in message
news:eit9gi$l58$1@news.ucalgary.ca...

> CNN is reporting things differently. They have 51 seats for the dems, 49
> for the repubs, and 0 independents.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate/
>
> Not sure why there's a discrepancy.

It's 49 R, 50 D right now. Virginia will be up in the air for a while
unless the incumbent macaca concedes. He's about 8,000 votes behind, so
Allen must be hoping for a lot of dangling chads.

The reason for the 0 independents is because independents aren't really
independent. They just say they are to stand out from the crowd. They're
really democrats in disguise, so CNN simply counts them as democrats.

"RecScubaPoster" <recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1163040649.403982.98870@h54g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick wrote:
>> "RecScubaPoster" <recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1163038120.071990.206940@m7g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
>> >
>> > Greg Mossman wrote:
>> >> I almost didn't post this because I didn't want to gloat. But I
>> >> changed
>> >> my
>> >> mind.
>> >>
>> >> It's a beautiful morning. Long Live Speaker Pelosi!
>> >
>> > President Pelosi after the trials.
>>
>> Yeah, yeah,
>>
>> We heard all about President Dean and President Kerry.
>>
>> They had a better chance.
>
> Why aren't you in Iraq yet Big Boy?

They're afraid I'll cut it too short?

Grumman-581 wrote:
> <acctforjunk@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1163019303.290797.186060@h54g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> > Nah, he's just a pissed off Republican.
>
> And you're a Rust Belt Yankee...
>


Even if this isn't totally accurate , this is Grumman's way of telling
everyone he figured out IP addresses and WHOIS. Congrats.

Scott wrote:
> "RecScubaPoster" <recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1163040649.403982.98870@h54g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
>
> > Why aren't you in Iraq yet Big Boy?
>
> Better reason than you arent;

?

You need to dry out for at least a month. That cheap shit you keep
drinking is killing that pea you try to think of as a brain.

>
> He tried.
>

And wasn't even fit for cannon fodder. I would bet it was the psych
tests.

"RecScubaPoster" <recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1163044513.769089.35650@h48g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...

> And wasn't even fit for cannon fodder.

You are not only an idiot and a bigot of epic proportion, but you are coward
and a punk.

> I would bet it was the psych tests.

You would know, punk. As if you would pass one.

He got closer than you ever will or would.

What branch did you serve with, Eric?

Bitch.

<acctforjunk@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1163043318.256263.165450@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com...
> Even if this isn't totally accurate , this is Grumman's way of telling
> everyone he figured out IP addresses and WHOIS. Congrats.

Oh? Feel free to update me with your real location... I'll post it with
everyone else's... Well, at least those who aren't hiding behind some sort
of anonymous mechanism...

http://grumman581.googlepages.com/re...mber-locations
http://grumman581.googlepages.com/rec-scuba-members.jpg

Lla qindi qawdihaw "Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> dawghattlxhasi:

> It turns out that the two independents are democrats in independent
> clothing.

Get out your basement and get a job, Chrissy.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"RecScubaPoster" <recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1163038067.934346.96850@m73g2000cwd.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Carl Nisarel wrote:
> > Lla qindi qawdihaw Joe English <joeenglish2@wisperhome.com> dawghattlxhasi:
> >
> > >> And Donald Rumsfeld fired
> > >>
> > > uh no, resigned
> >
> > <snicker>
> >
> > He was asked to resign, dipshit.
>
> He was TOLD to resign.

You were there?

Greg Mossman wrote:
> I almost didn't post this because I didn't want to gloat. But I changed my
> mind.
>
> It's a beautiful morning. Long Live Speaker Pelosi!

Don't you mean "President Pelosi"?

After the impeachments.

<bestweb3d@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1163088573.663762.167930@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> Greg Mossman wrote:
> > I almost didn't post this because I didn't want to gloat. But I changed my
> > mind.
> >
> > It's a beautiful morning. Long Live Speaker Pelosi!
>
> Don't you mean "President Pelosi"?
>
> After the impeachments.

What impeachments?

You don't honestly believe that all of those moderate democrats that were just elected are going to
kick Bush out of office do you? Even if they do, they'd then have to kick Cheney out of office too.
They better work on those in conjunction because if either one gets ousted while the other is still
in office, the person still in office will work to quickly replace the vacated VP position and
Pelosi will never get her chance at the seat.

For instance, if Bush gets kicked out, Cheney becomes president and will then promote someone
(Condi?) to take his now vacated position. If Cheney gets kicked out, Bush would just replace him
with someone (Condi again?) and there'd be a new VP to fill the chain of succession.

If the House manages to get them both impeached, I can't imagine that the republicans in the senate
would help to break a fillibuster (60% vote required if you recall) to allow a simultaneous vote on
their removal from office. The republicans *might* allow a vote on one or the other. If one of
them manages to get kicked out, I can't imagine that the republicans would help to break a
filibuster on the other one until after a new VP was confirmed. Basically, you'd have a stalemate
until the next elections in 08. If that happened, the democrats would try to use it against ht
republicans by showing that they aren't being "bi-partisan", but I think that it would show how
uni-partisan both sides are and would end up backfiring in the dems faces and, if it had any effect
whatsoever on the electorate, would lose seats for the dems in '08 by showing that Pelosi and co
aren't being as bi-partisan as they claimed they would be.