|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1105735234.755085.89200@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com... > Smoked a pack and a half a day for 30 years when I quit cold-turkey. > I am a counterexample to the claim that cigarette smoking is additive. If it wasn't addictive (assuming that's what you mean), why did you smoke a pack and a half a day of a potent carcinogen for 30 years? Self-destructive? |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message news:41e84c47$0$104$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com... > If it wasn't addictive, why did you smoke a pack and a half of cigarettes per day for 30 years? "It's my only luxury in life." "I enjoy smoking." "It's good for my lungs because it cleans them out.: "It helps me relax." "It's great with a cup of coffee." "I like the smell of the Camel when it burns." "It keeps me from getting colds." "It keeps mosquitoes away while I'm fishing." "It keeps the gnats off my face in the woods." "It goes great at the bar with my buddies to be social." "Beer with no cigarette?" "It gives me something to do with my hands." "It's how to break the ice with the girl you don't know." "It's a cheap form of entertainment." "I support the tobacco farmers." "I need to carry matches to light it - and you never know when you'll need a match." "Oscar and Everett smoke so it wouldn't be right if I didn't join them." "We need to support the economy." "Because I want to." |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:42:50 -0800, Greg Mossman wrote: > "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1105735234.755085.89200@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com... > >> Smoked a pack and a half a day for 30 years when I quit cold-turkey. >> I am a counterexample to the claim that cigarette smoking is additive. > > If it wasn't addictive (assuming that's what you mean), why did you smoke a > pack and a half a day of a potent carcinogen for 30 years? > Self-destructive? Tobacco is a stimulant. "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into thereoms." --Paul Erdos |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| If your going to quote me, get it right! and don't use it out of context. -- Download SCUBA Divelog Software http://www.kazdivephotos.com _____________________________ "ben bradlee" <up2u2figr@NoWay.zip> wrote in message news:dNqdnQgql_2XT3rcRVn-rg@centurytel.net... > > "Meatball" <chris122@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:1105664556.794091.184680@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com... > > Hi! > > I stopped smoking 8 days ago and will be going on an 8 day dive > > vacation this Saturday. anyone care to comment on impact on healing > > (non-smoking) lungs? > > Steve: It would probably be agood idea to call DAN and ask somebody whose > amswer might be better informed than what you'll get here, or > else start smoking and quit again when you get home. > > Dillon: We're all idiots here. > > Kaz: I have been [quitting] smoking for over 30 years and have had no > problems with any strange side effects apart from using less air and > coughing and spitting flem into my regulator. > > Joe: I would think the diving will just help your diving. > > > > The dentist commented on how improved my teeth, gums, and mouth > > are. He took xrays to show improvements. > > Haaacccckkkk. Well now. Excuse me for a moment. Thank you for placing the > spitoons conveniently in the center of the dive boat. > > To quote my mother. "I've been smoking for 70 years and it hasn't hurt me. > They can't prove that smoking does anything to your health." It's all hype! > The real problem is all the chemicals they use. Chemicals are bad - tobacco > is good." > > So there you have it; if you believe the x-ray and haven't been around > chemicals, you can dive as deep as you want for as long as you want. > > I don't think I'd elevate this post to the level of an opinion. > > > |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Greg Mossman wrote: > "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1105735234.755085.89200@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com... > > > Smoked a pack and a half a day for 30 years when I quit cold-turkey. > > I am a counterexample to the claim that cigarette smoking is additive. > > If it wasn't addictive (assuming that's what you mean), why did you smoke a > pack and a half a day of a potent carcinogen for 30 years? > Self-destructive? The NON-additive part is the ability to QUIT cold-turkey, without any withdrawal symptom and without missing it on bit! For a lawyer, your logic should be better than asking the question you did (apart from your lack of understanding of the word "addictive"). I smoke a pack and a half a day because it was no more self-destructive than chewing gum, and cigs don't stick to the desk and your hair. There are lots of so-called medical "studies" who conclusions are no more valid than a declarative statement without any scientifically valid evidence. These tend to fool the gullible. -- Bob. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| ben bradlee wrote: > "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message > news:41e84c47$0$104$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com... > > If it wasn't addictive, why did you smoke a pack and a half of cigarettes > per day for 30 years? > > "It's my only luxury in life." Wrong. I had many luxuries. > "I enjoy smoking." I did. > "It helps me relax." True. > "It's great with a cup of coffee." Or two, or three ... > "I like the smell of the Camel when it burns." Never smoked a Camel. > "It keeps the gnats off my face in the woods." Nah. It could even keep the gnats off my face in newsgroups! > "It goes great at the bar with my buddies to be social." I don't drink. < ... snip ... > > "Because I want to." Yes. Because I wanted to, until there were too many social gnats telling others they shouldn't smoke while they are poluting the air with their aerosol cans, automobile exhaust, industrial chimney exhausts, farts, and other more destructive things than smoking. -- Bob. -- Bob. |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| "©´¯`·*kÂz*·´¯`©" <com.@©´¯`·*·´¯`©@.com> wrote in message news:csb2v5$puc$1@austar-news.austar.net.au... > If your going to quote me, get it right! and don't use it out of context. > Please note two things: 1. I quoted my mother. 2. You are not my mother. What I did without your blessing (apparently, and none was needed) was paraphrase and edit your reply in order to satirize. My post lampoons smokers, or quitters, and their perceived relationship with good health and scuba diving. My wife's brother smoked even after the operation for lung cancer. He had to promise the doctor that he would quit smoking in order for the doctor to do the operation - it was his second, after all. He could not keep the promise to quit smoking. My wife made him go outside to smoke. He struggled for breath with the remaining part of a lung while he negotiated thru the porch into the cold winter air. He could no longer make it all the way outside because he was too weak. He smoked on the cold porch filling his lungs with curling smoke from the burning Luck Strike. My wife knew that he cheated a bit by not going all the way out the back door but she did not say anything because the smoke did not enter the house. A couple days later when they found him dead she felt real bad for making him smoke outside. Maybe it was the cold winter air that killed him. |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| In reply to my posted message! "Quote" >>Kaz: I have been [quitting] smoking for over 30 years and have had no >>problems with any strange side effects apart from using less air and >>coughing and spitting flem into my regulator. "/Quote" : > 1. I quoted my mother. Did you? > 2. You are not my mother. Do tell! kaz |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| Reef Fish wrote: > Greg Mossman wrote: > >>"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:1105735234.755085.89200@z14g2000cwz.googleg roups.com... >> >> >>>Smoked a pack and a half a day for 30 years when I quit > > cold-turkey. > >>>I am a counterexample to the claim that cigarette smoking is > > additive. > >>If it wasn't addictive (assuming that's what you mean), why did you > > smoke a > >>pack and a half a day of a potent carcinogen for 30 years? >>Self-destructive? > > > The NON-additive part is the ability to QUIT cold-turkey, without any > withdrawal symptom and without missing it on bit! > > For a lawyer, your logic should be better than asking the question you > did (apart from your lack of understanding of the word "addictive"). > I smoke a pack and a half a day because it was no more self-destructive > than chewing gum, and cigs don't stick to the desk and your hair. > > There are lots of so-called medical "studies" who conclusions are no > more valid than a declarative statement without any scientifically > valid evidence. These tend to fool the gullible. > > -- Bob. > Oh well shit! I gotta start smoking! |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1105794813.674425.305900@c13g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com... > For a lawyer, your logic should be better than asking the question you > did (apart from your lack of understanding of the word "addictive"). > I smoke a pack and a half a day because it was no more self-destructive > than chewing gum, and cigs don't stick to the desk and your hair. I don't really want to know how your gum ended up in your hair, but I can understand why cigarette smoke would make your hair, and your clothes, and your hands all smell like cigarette smoke. Staining of the teeth. Coughing. Ostracism by your non-smoking peers. Over thirty years you must have noticed some of this, yet you persisted in your behavior. Merely stubborn or addicted? > There are lots of so-called medical "studies" who conclusions are no > more valid than a declarative statement without any scientifically > valid evidence. These tend to fool the gullible. So which of the surgeon general's warnings do you believe are not supported by adequate studies? People have been smoking and consequently dying from lung cancer and other smoking-related diseases in much greater numbers than non-smokers for many years now. You believe it's just a coincidence? "Philip Morris USA agrees with the overwhelming medical and scientific consensus that cigarette smoking is addictive. It can be very difficult to quit smoking, but this should not deter smokers who want to quit from trying to do so." http://www.philipmorrisusa.com/en/he.../addiction.asp |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Here it is. The smoking gun. | Walter Frei | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 03-27-2007 01:28 AM |
| Scuba Diving & Lung Capacity | nitespark | Divers Hangout | 11 | 03-26-2007 09:17 PM |
| DCI and Smoking ... again! | Reef Fish | Divers Hangout | 129 | 03-26-2007 11:55 AM |
| Help -- Genesis dive computer stopped working | tomgee | Gear | 24 | 04-05-2006 02:56 PM |
| Re: Here it is. The smoking gun. | Keith S. | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 14 | 05-14-2005 12:06 AM |