Greg on His Women and Drinking :-)

Greg> I can get females in natural settings (like bars) t*o*
possibly
Greg> stick around a little with creative conversation and *offers
Greg> of fre*e alcohol.

And that's how it looks afterwards?

http://www.rudefun.com/funpages/toomuch.html

I found that in rec.travel.cruises, posted by one Chrissy Cruiser.

Greg, you learned your way with women from the cruise folks? )
-- Bob.

"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1106969504.051638.283790@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...

> Greg, you learned your way with women from the cruise folks? )

Careful, Bob. You've accused many others of libeling you in the past.
You're already on the hook for $19,000. Are you sure you want to make it
worse?

I'm curious why a worldly man such as you thinks himself immune from the
judgment of a U.S. court of law.

"Greg Mossman" wrote ...
> I'm curious why a worldly man such as you thinks himself immune from the
> judgment of a U.S. court of law.

If he was from Texas, I could understand it... The dead can't collect...
<evil-grin>

Greg Mossman wrote:
> "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1106969504.051638.283790@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
>
> > Greg, you learned your way with women from the cruise folks? )
>
> Careful, Bob. You've accused many others of libeling you in the
past.

Yup, when they made libelous statements about me.

Are you saying that by asking that QUESTION (even if we drop the
smiley) that I was LIBELING you? LOL, Greg. You are REALLY
stressed in your repeated attempts to weasel and welsh out of
your LOST bets that you are losing your senses.


> You're already on the hook for $19,000.

Really now?

You had only fantazied about the $18,000 in our verifiable
IQ test score bet -- in which I have VERIFIABLE PROOF
that I had a tested IQ score of AT LEAST 150, while you have
failed to produce ANY verifiable score on ANY IQ test taken by
you before 2005 (a stated condition of the bet that it had to
have been taken BEFORE the bet was offered and accepted).

Greg's fantasy is based SOLELY on a number, 168, which he said
his mother had told him (Greg didn't have any recollection of
when, where, or what IQ test he had taken) was his IQ, but
FAILED to provide any verifiable proof or record!

I had charitably given Greg the benefit of the doubt that he
MAY have an IQ as high as 130, in which case he would have lost
AT LEAST $1,000 to me by taking our bet -- which he has been
welshing ever since, including NOW.


As for the other $1,000 -- it was actually $2,000 you LOST,
Greg! I had doucmented your LOSS in my "smoking gun"
evidence against you (in the archives). LOL.


> Are you sure you want to make it worse?

How? The only way for it to get any worse is for you to CONTINUE
WELSHING, not content to just SHUT UP and count your blessing that
you're not sued for the amounts you welshed!

>
> I'm curious why a worldly man such as you thinks himself immune from
the
> judgment of a U.S. court of law.

On our bets, I am definitely IMMUNED to any suit, or your BLUFFS
and threats of a suit by YOU, Greg!

On the other hand, I am far from being immuned to the judgment of any
US court of law -- I even volunteered to pay a fine of $687 for a
speeding ticket (a month ago) WITHOUT going to court.

Greg, if you are as smart as I gave you credit for (an IQ of 130),
you would have SHUT UP long before now, and counted your blessing
that I did not sue you for the amount you welshed!

-- Bob.

"Reef Fish" wrote ...
> I even volunteered to pay a fine of $687 for a
> speeding ticket (a month ago) WITHOUT going
> to court.

In what state was that? Hell, the worst I ever received was $200 + court
costs (about $32) for 154 in a 55 back in the early 1990s... Don't remember
if I got frequent flyer miles for that one though...

Bob Ling "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> fictionalizes:
> >
> > You're already on the hook for $19,000.
>
> Really now?
>
> You had only fantazied about the $18,000 in our verifiable
> IQ test score bet -- in which I have VERIFIABLE PROOF
> that I had a tested IQ score of AT LEAST 150...


No reputable person has seen Bob Ling's alleged "proof".


"Publish or Perish."




-hh

H. Huntzinger wrote:
> Bob Ling "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> fictionalizes:
> > >
> > > You're already on the hook for $19,000.
> >
> > Really now?
> >
> > You had only fantazied about the $18,000 in our verifiable
> > IQ test score bet -- in which I have VERIFIABLE PROOF
> > that I had a tested IQ score of AT LEAST 150...
>
>
> No reputable person has seen Bob Ling's alleged "proof".

I said I have the proof. I HAVE the proof. Greg is smart enough to
have CONCEDED that fact. Greg is the only one having a bet with me.
>
>
> "Publish or Perish."

Why should I do anything for YOU, a worthless heckler who holds a
permanent grudge and can do nothing but bark. You put YOUR money
on it, then you will see it! Otherwise, STFU, and go back to your
army barrack to nurse your Hypocrite Supreme reputation.

Greg will see my PROOF as soon as he furnishes a verifiable proof
of HIS IQ test score that he'll use for our bet.


You want to put a little money of YOURS on a SIDE bet? Like $10,000?
I am pretty sure Greg is not going to put any money on THAT bet, that
"I can furnish PROOF that I had a tested IQ score of AT LEAST 150".

Anyone ELSE is welcome to take the same bet I offered you too.

The more the merrier. If I get enough clueless dumbasses like you
to take the bet, Hugh, I'll be able to have a BIG PARTY (all expenses
paid by the x times $10,000 I'll win) for those good citizens of
rec.scuba.locations (and rec.scuba) who had participated in these
ngs during the controversy, but fairly and wisely refrained from
making your kind of NOISES.


PUT UP or SHUT UP, you officious, odious, self-acknowledged-Permenant-
Grudge-Holder, Hypocrite-Supreme Hugh Huntzinger!

-- Bob.

Reef Fish wrote:
snip<>
>
> Anyone ELSE is welcome to take the same bet I offered you too.
>
> The more the merrier. If I get enough clueless dumbasses like you
> to take the bet, Hugh, I'll be able to have a BIG PARTY (all expenses
> paid by the x times $10,000 I'll win) for those good citizens of
> rec.scuba.locations (and rec.scuba) who had participated in these
> ngs during the controversy, but fairly and wisely refrained from
> making your kind of NOISES.
>
> -- Bob.
>

Bob,

Even by your standards this is quite possibly the most arrogant post in
the history of usenet. You believe your IQ is higher than everyone
online?????

Without knowing the exact details of your bet it seems you want a test
you recognise being taken before anyone takes a bet. Therefore:

Please name tests you recognise now (and the one you are going to use as
proof - clearly stating your score is unneccessary/unfair at this point).

This will allow anyone who cares to take up your offer to do so on a
basis that cannot later be disputed - they obviously will need to do it
before taking the bet in order to keep you happy.

Also, have you any other verifiable scores other than the one you will
refer to as proof - if so what are they and how divergent are the scores?

Why not (just for fun) name a reputable test no-one/minimal people have
done before and post the results?

Simon wrote:
> Reef Fish wrote:
> snip<>
> >
> > Anyone ELSE is welcome to take the same bet I offered you too.

Errrr, Simon, you clipped too much! This was the bet I offered Hugh:

RF> You want to put a little money of YOURS on a SIDE bet? Like*
$10,000?
RF> "I can furnish PROOF that I had a tested IQ score of AT LEAS*T
150".
RF>
RF> Anyone ELSE is welcome to take the same bet I offered you to*o.


> >
> > The more the merrier. If I get enough clueless dumbasses like you
> > to take the bet, Hugh, I'll be able to have a BIG PARTY (all
expenses
> > paid by the x times $10,000 I'll win) for those good citizens of
> > rec.scuba.locations (and rec.scuba) who had participated in these
> > ngs during the controversy, but fairly and wisely refrained from
> > making your kind of NOISES.
> >
> > -- Bob.
> >
>
> Bob,
>
> Even by your standards this is quite possibly the most arrogant post
in
> the history of usenet. You believe your IQ is higher than everyone
> online?????

No, but I believe you're the most illiterate, stupid person who
ever claimed to have a BA degree from Oxford, and had to purchase
a master's degree to make people think you were not as stupid as
you are.

> Without knowing the exact details of your bet

It was self-contained in ONE-LINE above.

RF> "I can furnish PROOF that I had a tested IQ score of AT LEAS*T
150".

Why don't you go back to grade school and BUY a few more degrees?
That won't help you to increase your single-digit IQ nor your
reading comprehension, but at least you'll help the grade school
in your area to have your tuition to educate the OTHERS there.
-- Bob.

Reef Fish wrote:
> Simon wrote:
>
>>Reef Fish wrote:
>>snip<>
>>
>>>Anyone ELSE is welcome to take the same bet I offered you too.
>
>
> Errrr, Simon, you clipped too much! This was the bet I offered Hugh:
>
> RF> You want to put a little money of YOURS on a SIDE bet? Like*
> $10,000?
> RF> "I can furnish PROOF that I had a tested IQ score of AT LEAS*T
> 150".
> RF>
> RF> Anyone ELSE is welcome to take the same bet I offered you to*o.
>
>
>
>>>The more the merrier. If I get enough clueless dumbasses like you
>>>to take the bet, Hugh, I'll be able to have a BIG PARTY (all
>
> expenses
>
>>>paid by the x times $10,000 I'll win) for those good citizens of
>>>rec.scuba.locations (and rec.scuba) who had participated in these
>>>ngs during the controversy, but fairly and wisely refrained from
>>>making your kind of NOISES.
>>>
>>>-- Bob.
>>>
>>
>>Bob,
>>
>>Even by your standards this is quite possibly the most arrogant post
>
> in
>
>>the history of usenet. You believe your IQ is higher than everyone
>>online?????
>
>
> No, but I believe you're the most illiterate, stupid person who
> ever claimed to have a BA degree from Oxford, and had to purchase
> a master's degree to make people think you were not as stupid as
> you are.
>

Blah blah - thread finished Bob, but whatever. We've been here and you
haven't said anything useful. For the final time - Oxford gives BAs to
everyone and gives MAs to everyone a few years later - I'm no different
to any other graduate of that particular University (not that it has
anything to do with this thread whatsoever). Incidentally - I said I am
fine a using the BA as my earned degree, you are, and have always been,
just obfuscating.
>


>>Without knowing the exact details of your bet
>
>
> It was self-contained in ONE-LINE above.
>
> RF> "I can furnish PROOF that I had a tested IQ score of AT LEAS*T
> 150".
>
> Why don't you go back to grade school and BUY a few more degrees?
> That won't help you to increase your single-digit IQ nor your
> reading comprehension, but at least you'll help the grade school
> in your area to have your tuition to educate the OTHERS there.
> -- Bob.
>
Fine - snipped nothing. You didn't answer any questions - again.....

What did you mean by

RF> Anyone ELSE is welcome to take the same bet I offered you to*o

Along with

>>>paid by the x times $10,000 I'll win) for those good citizens of
>>>rec.scuba.locations (and rec.scuba) who had participated in these
>>>ngs during the controversy, but fairly and wisely refrained from
>>>making your kind of NOISES.

What will you recognise as tests?

Again - you are changing the subject - you posted a challenge, what will
you see as legitimate results - not a very hard question unless you are
back pedalling at high speed.