Greg Mossman is running out of WELCHING tricks

Michael Wolf wrote: I've got Reef Fish in my blocked senders list

Chris Guynn wrote: Yeah, I have him KF'd too, but seen the amount
new posts he's starting for the moment I would guess
***
So we are finally seeing two NEW Blind morons GUESSING ... with their
heads firmly planted where the sun don't shine -- just like Lee!


Those are the ONLY posters supporting Greg, because they have not
read any of the clearly documented evidence of Greg's LOSS and
continued WELSHING. I had already said elsewhere:


Greg Mossman the welsher wrote:

> I'm trying to have a serious debate with Jer about keeping dolphins
for
> pets. You're buzzing around like a gnat on steroids. Buzz someone
else for
> a change you obsessed old fool.

Sure, Greg; and kept mentioning the $19,000 you'll win in the bet
you welshed in your "serious debate" with Jer, on DOLPHINS?


Let me give you a clue, Greg.

You are trying all those misdirection, obfuscation, playing dumb,
tricks in trying to weasel out of a losing bet -- the cheap
tricks that had already been tried by lots of other fools -- Lee
Bell in particular, in his attempt to obfuscate.

It never worked, and it never will. So, Lee is now using the last
trick he knows -- dig his head into his HOLE and come out posting
ignorance and nonsense because he doesn't have a clue what was
going on.


Now I am discovering there are several NEW ostriches that are doing
the SAME dumb thing Lee is doing -- Chris Guynn (who I had thought
was smarter than that), Michael Wolf (who had already shown he
wasn't ever worth anything), and may be others -- who are out
there SIMULTANEOUSLY saying they didn't know the facts, AND trying
to taunt me into falling for your trick of taking an IQ test, or
any other test for that matter.



They can try your "Stoooopid Trick" <tm> until they die, and I
can quarantee you it's NOT going to happen -- that I would go out
and take a test just because a MORON WELSHER tries to use that
as his welshing trick.



> When I find my IQ score, I'll call you.

When you find your IQ score, everyone will be dead. But there
will be plenty of people ALIVE who can look the archives, and
see what a damned fool and WEASEL and WELSHER Greg Mossman is.


You don't need any IQ test or IQ scores to see that you are too
MORONIC and STOOOOOPID to see that your tricks worked ONLY on
your worshipping morons like Jason and Crownfield and the other
newly discovered imbedils and idiots.

The sad reality is that you grossly OVER=ESTIMATED your intelligence
and your ability deceive, while grossly UNDER-ESTIMATED the fact
that I am not only too smart for fall for any of your cheap and
stupid tricks, but I am so much smarter than you are that I exposed
and debunked EVERY one of your obfuscation tricks.')

-- Bob.

P.S. Don't expect me to respond to every one, not even every 10th
one of your (and your morons') subsequent posts on this IQ bet you
welshed. My answers and irrefutable verdicts are already in place
in the archives.

"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1107297763.583843.152510@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
> Michael Wolf wrote: I've got Reef Fish in my blocked senders list
>
> Chris Guynn wrote: Yeah, I have him KF'd too, but seen the amount
> new posts he's starting for the moment I would guess
> ***
> So we are finally seeing two NEW Blind morons GUESSING ... with their
> heads firmly planted where the sun don't shine -- just like Lee!

Bob, I'm new to this ng (and probably setting myself up for some sophomoric
insult just by speaking up) but hasn't it become evident to you that no one
agrees with your interpretation of the discussion, no one is standing up for
you (as they are for Greg), that no one appears to have any degree of
respect for your behavior or opinion in this matter and that every single
person to date whom has remarked on the issue at hand is seemingly convinced
you are a liar and an ass?

Whatever silent majority/minority on this ng you believe you are speaking to
or playing for doesn't, I suspect, exist.

Without having any idea of the history between you and these other posters
I must say ----- "Boy, am I glad I'm not you".

Bradburn Fentress wrote:

> Without having any idea of the history between you
and the only bettor here, it's time for new moron to get some idea:

Greg's confession,
http://tinyurl.com/5cdjk


Invalidity of Greg's SAT and LSAT test/score as IQ t*est/score,
http://tinyurl.com/4ovxq

Only low grade morons gets fooled by Greg -- that's what I say!
Don't need a crowd of moron to cheer on that.

-- Bob.

"Bradburn Fentress" wrote

> Whatever silent majority/minority on this ng you believe you are speaking
to
> or playing for doesn't, I suspect, exist.
>
> Without having any idea of the history between you and these other posters
> I must say ----- "Boy, am I glad I'm not you".

Now that's the way to make new friends in Rec.Scuba! Welcome to our bar.
If you judge diving as well as you judge people, you'll do fine.

Lee

Lee Bell wrote:
> "Bradburn Fentress" wrote

> > Without having any idea of the history

> If you judge diving as well as you judge people, you'll do fine.
>
> Lee

Bradburn, Lee thinks all people are blind and that he can fool all
of the people all of the time.


Lee failed to read or comprehend what should be obvious even to
an average moron, that Greg had LOST and WELSHED:

Greg's confession,
http://tinyurl.com/5cdjk


Invalidity of Greg's SAT and LSAT test/score as IQ t*est/score,
http://tinyurl.com/4ovxq

Only low grade morons gets fooled by Greg -- that's what I say!

Greg had rallied a crowd of morons, but neither Greg nor his
throng of low-grade morons can provide any factual rebuttal to
the documented proof of Greg's LOSS and WELSHES.

-- Bob.

"Bradburn Fentress" <pleased@n't.spam> wrote in message
news:9GULd.53$Ld2.7463@news.uswest.net...
>
> "Senile Reef Fish" <Large_Senile Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in
message
> news:1107297763.583843.152510@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
>
> Bob, I'm new to this ng (and probably setting myself up for some
sophomoric
> insult just by speaking up) but hasn't it become evident to you that no
one
> agrees with your interpretation of the discussion, no one is standing up
for
> you (as they are for Greg), that no one appears to have any degree of
> respect for your behavior or opinion in this matter and that every single
> person to date whom has remarked on the issue at hand is seemingly
convinced
> you are a liar and an ass?
>
> Whatever silent majority/minority on this ng you believe you are speaking
to
> or playing for doesn't, I suspect, exist.
>
> Without having any idea of the history between you and these other posters
> I must say ----- "Boy, am I glad I'm not you".

Welcome, welcome. Don't be afraid to talk diving. We like to do that too,
very much.

That said, when it gets a bit boring in here, one or the other of us will
poke Bob with a stick and see what we can stir up.

It's just getting too easy these days . . .

>
>
>
>

"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote:

> "Bradburn Fentress" wrote
> >
> > Without having any idea of the history between you and these other posters
> > I must say ----- "Boy, am I glad I'm not you".
>
> Now that's the way to make new friends in Rec.Scuba! Welcome to our bar.
> If you judge diving as well as you judge people, you'll do fine.


Absolutely.


Now back to diving ... what are people's plans for where they want to go
in 2005?


Just had a non-diving friend get back from Belize ... they've just had a
strike down there ... had a few days on the beach at one of the Cays and
is interested in trying some snorkeling elsewhere in the Caribbean.

I know Bonaire's one choice, as is also Little Cayman (off the
diveboats). Where else would recommend for snorkeling?


-hh

" H. Huntzinger" <{NOSPAM-rm_to_reply}rec-scuba2005@huntzinger.com> wrote in
message
news:{NOSPAM-rm_to_reply}rec-scuba2005-6D3991.07475502022005@news.giganews.com...
> Now back to diving ... what are people's plans for where they want to go
> in 2005?
>
>
> Just had a non-diving friend get back from Belize ... they've just had a
> strike down there ... had a few days on the beach at one of the Cays and
> is interested in trying some snorkeling elsewhere in the Caribbean.
>
> I know Bonaire's one choice, as is also Little Cayman (off the
> diveboats). Where else would recommend for snorkeling?
>
>
> -hh

Coco View April 23 - May 7. Only 80 days from now.

" H. Huntzinger" <{NOSPAM-rm_to_reply}rec-scuba2005@huntzinger.com> wrote in
message
news:{NOSPAM-rm_to_reply}rec-scuba2005-6D3991.07475502022005@news.giganews.com...
> > Now that's the way to make new friends in Rec.Scuba! Welcome to our
bar.
> > If you judge diving as well as you judge people, you'll do fine.
>
>
> Absolutely.
>
>
> Now back to diving ... what are people's plans for where they want to go
> in 2005?

Back to Roatan, looking also at Dominica and San Andres, Columbia.

> Just had a non-diving friend get back from Belize ... they've just had a
> strike down there ... had a few days on the beach at one of the Cays and
> is interested in trying some snorkeling elsewhere in the Caribbean.

I don't think the general strike would have hampered the snorkelling any.
:^) In any event, if they were on Ambergris or Caye Caulker, there's
certainly better places to snorkel. Sure, the snorkelling is great at a
couple of sites, but you need to take a boat out to them.

Now in Roatan, that is not the case. In some places the really good stuff
starts almost immediately from shore.

>
> I know Bonaire's one choice, as is also Little Cayman (off the
> diveboats). Where else would recommend for snorkeling?
>
>
> -hh

"chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
news:ig7Md.252849$Xk.237524@pd7tw3no...

> Back to Roatan, looking also at Dominica and San Andres, Columbia.

Columbia? Don't tell Marior. He already thinks we're all crazy for braving
the dangers of Cozumel.