Global warnig and ..sharks

Philip Davidson wrote:

>
>
> I haven't been there since the 70s
> dead seagulls wrapped up in seaweed
> when they wasn't shiting on you.

Last been there in 1978. Lovely, yes, though a bit crowded. And the
Seagulls lined up for yer left over fish'n chips.
Except, they decided when it was apt to be classified as leftover.
Somewhere between the plate and your mouth.

Matthias

> Sharks can eat anything and everything. They just don't give a damn.

The same is often said about goats.

Oh, my Gawd... It' a goat... Run for your lives....

Thus spake "Martin" <GOD@Pyro.net> :

>
>> Sharks can eat anything and everything. They just don't give a damn.
>
> The same is often said about goats.
>
> Oh, my Gawd... It' a goat... Run for your lives....
>

You forgot the oboe music.

--
dillon
Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
of life.

And a damn fine one, at that.

In article <16tjc1d2lk8varl0ccdoqecm0782oa5a6p@4ax.com>, Dillon Pyron
<dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote:

€ Thus spake "Martin" <GOD@Pyro.net> :
€
€ >
€ >> Sharks can eat anything and everything. They just don't give a damn.
€ >
€ > The same is often said about goats.
€ >
€ > Oh, my Gawd... It' a goat... Run for your lives....
€ >
€
€ You forgot the oboe music.

>dillon
>Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
>of life.

>And a damn fine one, at that.

>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652

Opera/Wine, right?

Thus spake Alan Street <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> :

>In article <16tjc1d2lk8varl0ccdoqecm0782oa5a6p@4ax.com>, Dillon Pyron
><dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>€ Thus spake "Martin" <GOD@Pyro.net> :
>€
>€ >
>€ >> Sharks can eat anything and everything. They just don't give a damn.
>€ >
>€ > The same is often said about goats.
>€ >
>€ > Oh, my Gawd... It' a goat... Run for your lives....
>€ >
>€
>€ You forgot the oboe music.
>
>>dillon
>>Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
>>of life.
>
>>And a damn fine one, at that.
>
>>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
>
>Opera/Wine, right?
>
>

No, I'm currently stranded on Windblows for compatibility reasons with
my customers. But I use as few MS products as possible, Agent,
Eudora, Firefox, Open Office, etc.

--
dillon
Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
of life.

And a damn fine one, at that.

That may be one cause. However, another may be that their food source is
being depleated due to polution and over fishing. They may be moving into
shore to hunt.

"Phil." <felton@princeton.edu> wrote in message
news:1120534498.362224.118350@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>
>
> Pietro Sommavilla wrote:
> > From: The Times Friday June 17 2005 NEWS 27
> > by Simon De Bruxelles
> >
> > --------begin-------
> >
> > Sighiting of the sharks have increased by 65 percent in Scottish waters
> > over the past four years while reports from Cornwall and the South
> > west, where these pictures were taken last weekend, have fallen by 66
> > per cent
> >
> > [cut]
> >
> > These basking sharks look fearsome but the surfers and swimmers are no
> > in danger, the sharks, probably a mother and baby, may be the largest
> > wild animals, (the newspaper show one picture with a couple of swimmers
> > happily close to the basking sharks) to regulary visit british waters,
> > but they are also one of the most harmless.
> >
> > Scientists belive that the sharks, which can grow up to 18 m. (59ft)
> > long, are gradually moving north as a result of global warming.
> >
> > [cut]
> > ---------------end------
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > Are only the harmeless sharks moving north 'cause the global warming ?
> >
> > Are the swimmers (while in the waters) able to discern the species of
> > sharks ?
> >
> There always have been large numbers of Basking sharks off the Scottish
> and northern Irish coasts so much so that there was an industry for
> producing shark liver oil as a feedstock for the pharmaceutical
> industry. If there is an increase in sightings it's probably related
> to the results of shutting down the harpooners? Basking and Porbeagle
> sharks have always been indigenous to that coastline.
>

Pietro Sommavilla wrote:
> Thomas Palm wrote:
>> "Pietro Sommavilla" <judoka1...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:1119097536.660066.48320@o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com:
>
>>> Are only the harmeless sharks moving north 'cause the global warming ?
>
>> Probably not, but I don't think there are any dangerous sharks in or near
>> British waters.
>> Actually very few sharks are dangerous, there are even
>> scientists studying the Great White while swimming without any protection.
>
> August 24, 2005
> Marine biologist, 23, killed by a shark off Gleneig Beach, near
> Adelaide, Australia.
>
> [Definitely not a good idea]
>
> Sharks shows a poor sense of discernment when they launch themselves
> skywards towards any *natural* food source.
> :(
>
global warming!