OT - On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets

Alan Street wrote:
> Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
> and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
> was especially appropriate:
>
>
> Abstract
>
> Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
> protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.

Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?

Alan Street wrote:
> Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
> and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
> was especially appropriate:
>
>
> Abstract
>
> Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
> protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.

Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?

Whistler wrote:
> Alan Street wrote:
> > Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
> > and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
> > was especially appropriate:
> >
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> > Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
> > protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.
>
> Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?
>
What, tinned feesh?

Geo

Whistler wrote:
> Alan Street wrote:
> > Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
> > and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
> > was especially appropriate:
> >
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> > Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
> > protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.
>
> Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?
>
What, tinned feesh?

Geo

Whistler wrote:
> Alan Street wrote:
> > Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
> > and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
> > was especially appropriate:
> >
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> > Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
> > protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.
>
> Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?
>
Or would that be "tinny feesh"?

Geo

Whistler wrote:
> Alan Street wrote:
> > Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
> > and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
> > was especially appropriate:
> >
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> > Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
> > protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.
>
> Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?
>
Or would that be "tinny feesh"?

Geo

In article <gxMff.6288$Hs.4499@tornado.socal.rr.com>, Whistler
<whiNstOler@sSan.rPr.cAomM> wrote:

€ Alan Street wrote:
€ > Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
€ > and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
€ > was especially appropriate:
€ >
€ >
€ > Abstract
€ >
€ > Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
€ > protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.
€
€ Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?

In article <gxMff.6288$Hs.4499@tornado.socal.rr.com>, Whistler
<whiNstOler@sSan.rPr.cAomM> wrote:

€ Alan Street wrote:
€ > Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
€ > and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
€ > was especially appropriate:
€ >
€ >
€ > Abstract
€ >
€ > Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
€ > protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.
€
€ Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?

Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
was especially appropriate:


Abstract

Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals. We
investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet designs on a sample
group of four individuals. Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find
that although on average all helmets attenuate invasive radio
frequencies in either directions (either emanating from an outside
source, or emanating from the cranium of the subject), certain
frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. These amplified frequencies
coincide with radio bands reserved for government use according to the
Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Statistical evidence suggests
the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government's invasive
abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started
the helmet craze for this reason.

http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

Remember - Just because you're not paranoid, doesn't mean they're not
out to get you

Alan

Whistler wrote:
> Alan Street wrote:
> > Given the present quality of Feeshy arguments, as well as past on-topic
> > and off-topic rants in these esteemed newsgroups, I thought this study
> > was especially appropriate:
> >
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> > Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
> > protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.
>
> Just what part of ``tin'' do these guys not understand?
>
What, tinned feesh?

Geo