Re: Myths about Myths About Gun Control

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:14:30 -0800, Jammer Six <jammersix@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <1137081788.919911.7620@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.c om>,
> adriansdurham@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> They draw the conclusions they draw because it is uncomfortable for
>> them to draw other conclusions.
>
>Gee, that's exactly what you've been doing.
>
>"Lott is right, and if he's wrong, it doesn't affect his other
>conclusions."
>
>"Truth? We don't need no stinkin' truth..."

Oh really? Apparently you don't even know that Lott is an economist
using econometric modeling to study this issue since you think that
three Nobel laureate ECONOMISTS have no qualifications to evaluate his
work.

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:14:30 -0800, Jammer Six <jammersix@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <1137081788.919911.7620@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.c om>,
> adriansdurham@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> They draw the conclusions they draw because it is uncomfortable for
>> them to draw other conclusions.
>
>Gee, that's exactly what you've been doing.
>
>"Lott is right, and if he's wrong, it doesn't affect his other
>conclusions."
>
>"Truth? We don't need no stinkin' truth..."

Oh really? Apparently you don't even know that Lott is an economist
using econometric modeling to study this issue since you think that
three Nobel laureate ECONOMISTS have no qualifications to evaluate his
work.

In article <n3ogs1p8esuqeka201phqlf6g8epk7he27@4ax.com>,
Adrian <adriansdurham@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Oh really? Apparently you don't even know that Lott is an economist
> using econometric modeling to study this issue since you think that
> three Nobel laureate ECONOMISTS have no qualifications to evaluate his
> work.

Make it matter. Show some balls. Admit that the cite takes him down.

--
"A bunch of us went down to Gettysburg.
Some of us didn't come back.
If you weren't there, you'll never understand." --Unknown Infantryman

In article <n3ogs1p8esuqeka201phqlf6g8epk7he27@4ax.com>,
Adrian <adriansdurham@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Oh really? Apparently you don't even know that Lott is an economist
> using econometric modeling to study this issue since you think that
> three Nobel laureate ECONOMISTS have no qualifications to evaluate his
> work.

Make it matter. Show some balls. Admit that the cite takes him down.

--
"A bunch of us went down to Gettysburg.
Some of us didn't come back.
If you weren't there, you'll never understand." --Unknown Infantryman

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:54:30 -0800, Jammer Six <jammersix@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <n3ogs1p8esuqeka201phqlf6g8epk7he27@4ax.com>,
> Adrian <adriansdurham@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oh really? Apparently you don't even know that Lott is an economist
>> using econometric modeling to study this issue since you think that
>> three Nobel laureate ECONOMISTS have no qualifications to evaluate his
>> work.
>
>Make it matter. Show some balls. Admit that the cite takes him down.

YOU show some balls and start defending your assertion. The cite
doesn't take him down and at this point you wont even cite it. If it
is the same one that he has in his book, then it is a 105% INCREASE in
crime going from concealed carry states to non-concealed carry states.

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:54:30 -0800, Jammer Six <jammersix@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <n3ogs1p8esuqeka201phqlf6g8epk7he27@4ax.com>,
> Adrian <adriansdurham@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oh really? Apparently you don't even know that Lott is an economist
>> using econometric modeling to study this issue since you think that
>> three Nobel laureate ECONOMISTS have no qualifications to evaluate his
>> work.
>
>Make it matter. Show some balls. Admit that the cite takes him down.

YOU show some balls and start defending your assertion. The cite
doesn't take him down and at this point you wont even cite it. If it
is the same one that he has in his book, then it is a 105% INCREASE in
crime going from concealed carry states to non-concealed carry states.

"Adrian" <adriansdurham@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:n3ogs1p8esuqeka201phqlf6g8epk7he27@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:14:30 -0800, Jammer Six <jammersix@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <1137081788.919911.7620@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.c om>,
> > adriansdurham@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> They draw the conclusions they draw because it is uncomfortable for
> >> them to draw other conclusions.
> >
> >Gee, that's exactly what you've been doing.
> >
> >"Lott is right, and if he's wrong, it doesn't affect his other
> >conclusions."
> >
> >"Truth? We don't need no stinkin' truth..."
>
> Oh really? Apparently you don't even know that Lott is an economist
> using econometric modeling to study this issue since you think that
> three Nobel laureate ECONOMISTS have no qualifications to evaluate his
> work.
>

Have you seen any recent winners (and finalists) of the Nobel Peace prize?
I don't give that organization nearly the creedence I used to.

"Adrian" <adriansdurham@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:n3ogs1p8esuqeka201phqlf6g8epk7he27@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:14:30 -0800, Jammer Six <jammersix@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <1137081788.919911.7620@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.c om>,
> > adriansdurham@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> They draw the conclusions they draw because it is uncomfortable for
> >> them to draw other conclusions.
> >
> >Gee, that's exactly what you've been doing.
> >
> >"Lott is right, and if he's wrong, it doesn't affect his other
> >conclusions."
> >
> >"Truth? We don't need no stinkin' truth..."
>
> Oh really? Apparently you don't even know that Lott is an economist
> using econometric modeling to study this issue since you think that
> three Nobel laureate ECONOMISTS have no qualifications to evaluate his
> work.
>

Have you seen any recent winners (and finalists) of the Nobel Peace prize?
I don't give that organization nearly the creedence I used to.

In article <fjgns1t2ah6vjpcm7cretkpebsndn3deb2@4ax.com>,
Adrian <adriansdurham@hotmail.com> wrote:

> The cite doesn't take him down and at this point you wont even cite it.

If obvious error doesn't take him down, then there is no case under
which you will admit that his "research" is crap.

If there is no case under which you will admit that, then you have
assumed the conclusion regardless of what the data shows, and that would
simply make you a moron.

At least Feesh can afford cruises...

This is rec.scuba. We have real idealogues here.

You're not even close.

--
"A bunch of us went down to Gettysburg.
Some of us didn't come back.
If you weren't there, you'll never understand." --Unknown Infantryman

In article <fjgns1t2ah6vjpcm7cretkpebsndn3deb2@4ax.com>,
Adrian <adriansdurham@hotmail.com> wrote:

> The cite doesn't take him down and at this point you wont even cite it.

If obvious error doesn't take him down, then there is no case under
which you will admit that his "research" is crap.

If there is no case under which you will admit that, then you have
assumed the conclusion regardless of what the data shows, and that would
simply make you a moron.

At least Feesh can afford cruises...

This is rec.scuba. We have real idealogues here.

You're not even close.

--
"A bunch of us went down to Gettysburg.
Some of us didn't come back.
If you weren't there, you'll never understand." --Unknown Infantryman