|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1001
| |||
| |||
| "Reef Fish" wrote > Wonder why you snipped what Lee said? Simple enough, I'm correcting you, not Lee. > Even YOU knew enough to say, > >> >> > Disagree. And you're too stupid to realize what really happened. > Now you turned around when you saw Lee's ass in front of your face, > ready to be kissed, and you tried to mouth dance for him! What a > loser! Nice lie. Easy to spot, but very imaginative. Still, needs a lot of work if you're considering asany politics. >> >> Heiser? >> > >> > Dunno and duncare. > > I didn't want to go into that tangent, and I was merely toying with > YOUR ignorance about tanks. Lousy save, ball dropped, face in the sand. Don't know and don't care, another half truth? Don't know but do care? >> Then you obviously don't know jack shit about tanks. > > That's YOU. I gave the spec of that tank and I was discussing it > with Bill Mayne. I had all the details from the ARCHIVES, idiot! > LOL. And your point is, you live in the past, where you can change your version? > Heiser! Why did you have to ask? Of course it's NOT Heiser, Dummy! Too funny, viejo. Asked because I didn't see the archive yet, and I have seen specs on a huge boat anchor tank by (Heiser?). Pretty useless tanks for me, so just trivia. But, since you didn't answer "Beuchat", but dunno and duncare, seems you're definitely a fucking liar, you've penned yourself in to that. > Lee's ass must taste too good for you to want to keep kissing, to the > extent of retracting something you said that was actually CORRECT! And just what did I retract? Don't let the trurh get in the way of your fantasies. > Keep smacking it, Magilla. Any time you want me to smack your silly little head off, just ask me, I'll see if I can work it into my schedule. Your head is so full of sedimentary rock it might be worth my while, but I'd have to wear a haz-mat suit for the shit spray. You must drive the nursing home caretakers bananas viejo. Curtis |
|
#1002
| |||
| |||
| ""Magilla"" <cavey_curtis@$$ yahoo.com> wrote in message news:R5YUf.24858$bn3.20033@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... <snip another floor-wiping of another idiot> Spring is obviously on the way. > You must drive the nursing home caretakers bananas viejo. Dont forget you are talking to a Scientologist. Secret Squirrels, clams and all the rest. Scary part is they claim to do it on the 'natch. |
|
#1003
| |||
| |||
| Reef Fish wrote: > bob crownfield wrote: >> VerBal DiaRrhea Fish wrote: >> >> >>> Hugh, you never had ANYTHING correct, and when I complimented >>> you for having something almost correct when you explained some >>> basics in tidal volume and physiology to Lee, which sent him >>> whimpering to reduce his claim from a FULL TANK (5-6 lbs) change >>> of weight to 2 lbs. What a joker. >>> >>> Now you found yourself in the Gang, and are revoking whatever >>> little you knew, so as to establish your gang membership by playing >>> up to the uneducated, untrained, and unskilled: i.e., the rec.scuba >>> readership. >>> >>> I had responded to this post when it first came out (but Google lost >>> it) and I didn't bother to re-type it. But since you're making a >>> Bob Crownfield of yourself by posting a new subject to draw attention >>> to your own idiocy, I'll reply to this original piece of impertinence >>> of yours. >> you are such a pompous egotistical boring tedious windbag. >> no wonder I am now getting email from strangers >> reminding me what a self infatuated blowhard you are. > > So, Bob Crownfield's reason for his own existence is fulfilled -- > that he stalks my posts, Wrong. Again. Reading comprehension failure. Education failure. Lack of reasoning ability. I do not stalk you. I only reply to your amazingly stupid and arrogant statements that are beyond belief to intelligent people. that your idiocy is a basis for my fulfillment again shows how arrogantly presumptuous and consistently wrong you can be. what an ass you are. > my reference to his NOISE, he is now famous, among the > Dysfunctional Gang in rec.scuba, and even "strangers". the strangers are more of the peopLe who you have met and made enemies of by using your revoLting excuse for a personaLity. > > >> I hope that you impress yourself, >> because all the rest of us are laughing at you. > > Just like IDIOTS and Mental Midgets drooling and laughing at > anything intellectual they can't comprehend (such as DIVING > Physics and Physiology). But they can certainly LAUGH while > the drivel is hanging on their snots and feet dangling in their > mouths. you are behaving Like a seniLe old fart, a Loser. > Bob Crownfield -- the unselfish Mental Midget who would turn > himself in the police for crimes committed by other Mental Midgets > just to make himself known. said the pompous ignorant old windbag reeffish bob Ling, the Loser. EDUCATED people, UNLIKE yourself, find out what they are talking about before they LEAP to UNFOUNDED and IGNORANT conclusions. > > -- Reef Fish Bob, the blowhard. > |
|
#1004
| |||
| |||
| Scott wrote: > Dont forget you are talking to a Scientologist. > Secret Squirrels, clams and all the rest. Xenu is the father of Katie's baby. |
|
#1005
| |||
| |||
| "Dan Bracuk" <NOTbracuk@pathcom.com> wrote in message news:2u1922ph1e8bgti04kaqs3df3s2lqnadb4@4ax.com... > "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> pounded away at his keyboard resulting > in: > > :But while we are talking about it from your perspective, please tell me how > :you get to the surface after you have taken the air out of your BC, if you > :are no longer controlling your buoyancy through breathing. > > By this stage of the dive, usually I am slightly underweighted and I > just rise to the occasion. > > Other times I might have to use my fins. > > Having no shame, I am not above adding air to my bc to get me up > either. You add air to your BC to get you to the surface??? Shame has nothing to do with it. Please tell me I misunderstood. |
|
#1006
| |||
| |||
| "mike gray" <omgray@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:Qd8Qf.5851$8w2.5815@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > Matthias Voss wrote: > >> >> You forgot to mention the necessity to prove the first and second law of >> thermodynamics, and its impact on Schroedinger equations. >> > > 1. Each of us has different standards. > > 2. Most of us set higher standards for others than we do for ourselves. > > 3. Bullshit is inevitable in standard setting, especially if it is > bullshit the standard-setter is in love with. > > > And btw, what the hell are those "ten signs" that everyone seems to agree > are essential????? > > Don't they lead you to the bottom of the twelve steps? or is it the top, I can never remember? LD. |
|
#1007
| |||
| |||
| "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message news:YX6Uf.171981$H%4.147222@pd7tw2no... > > "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > news:Ov6Uf.825$qe.416@bignews1.bellsouth.net... >> "chilly" wrote >> >> > I've also been diving with a DM that didn't even have his inflator hose >> > connected to his BCD. When I asked him about it, he shrugged it off >> > and >> > said he used less air that way. Odd. >> >> > This left me wondering how he would get someone in trouble to the > surface. >> >> In order of what I think most likely: >> 1. Use theirs. > > Mightn't the problem be that more lift is needed? How much would you need? How much does your bc provide? Mayhap the troubled > diver's BC isn't working properly. I just seems plain unsafe to me. Ditch his weight? > >> 2. Connect the hose > > Yes, but generally time is a factor in such a situation. How long does it take? I figger I could attach an inflator hose much quicker than I can get to anyone I dive with. > >> 3. Inflate it orally > > Yes, but generally time is a factor in such a situation. Mebbe you need to practice blowing? > LD. |
|
#1008
| |||
| |||
| "Matthias Voss" <spammat.voss@gmx.de> wrote in message news:dvmktl$o35$01$8@news.t-online.com... > Limey wrote: > >> "Matthias Voss" <spammat.voss@gmx.de> wrote in message >> news:duse4t$tnj$03$1@news.t-online.com... >> >>>chilly wrote: >>> >>> >>>>"Matthias Voss" <spammat.voss@gmx.de> wrote in message >>>>news:dureum$q5p$02$1@news.t-online.com... >>>> >>>> >>>>>Greg Mossman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Matthias >>>>> >>>>>PS: Don't worry about the AKs. >>>>>We were accomponied by a chocolate cream soldier >>>> >>>> >>>>What's a "chocolate cream" soldier? >>> >>>To avoid being accused of non p.c. use of words caracterizing complexion, >>>read G.B. Shaw's "Plays Pleasant" >>> >>> >> >> You mean a New Orleans cop? > > Huh, I very faintly remember something in that direction. Pls. mind I > don't view TV. > > One of those crazy city officials up there mentioned it being a "chocolate city" or summat sislar......it was a f-ing ridiculous comment, either way. LD. |
|
#1009
| |||
| |||
| "Limey" <davidflies@noatt.crapnet> wrote in message news:_kdVf.27425$bn3.8823@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > > "Matthias Voss" <spammat.voss@gmx.de> wrote in message > news:dvmktl$o35$01$8@news.t-online.com... >> Limey wrote: >> >>> "Matthias Voss" <spammat.voss@gmx.de> wrote in message >>> news:duse4t$tnj$03$1@news.t-online.com... >>> >>>>chilly wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>"Matthias Voss" <spammat.voss@gmx.de> wrote in message >>>>>news:dureum$q5p$02$1@news.t-online.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Greg Mossman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>>PS: Don't worry about the AKs. >>>>>>We were accomponied by a chocolate cream soldier >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>What's a "chocolate cream" soldier? >>>> >>>>To avoid being accused of non p.c. use of words caracterizing >>>>complexion, read G.B. Shaw's "Plays Pleasant" >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You mean a New Orleans cop? >> >> Huh, I very faintly remember something in that direction. Pls. mind I >> don't view TV. >> >> > One of those crazy city officials up there mentioned it being a "chocolate > city" or *summat sislar*......it was a f-ing ridiculous comment, either > way. > > something similar dunno what happened there. |
|
#1010
| |||
| |||
| "dweeb" <brianfwagner@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1143264958.726634.269950@v46g2000cwv.googlegr oups.com... > > Scott wrote: > > Dont forget you are talking to a Scientologist. > > Secret Squirrels, clams and all the rest. > > Xenu is the father of Katie's baby. OK, you lost me. My investigation of Scientology only took me as far as a couple pages wherein the clams and the secret squirrel thing was explained. It was a paper written to educate cops who have to deal with obviously deranged people, and why they may hear some of the same utterances or rants from different "subjects". I undertsand L Ron died a in foaming mass of insanity as well. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PADI Training vs.. others | Divers Hangout | 700 | 03-26-2007 08:09 PM | |
| PADI Training vs.. others | Divers Hangout | 1 | 03-26-2007 08:04 PM | |
| PADI Training vs.. others | Gear | 972 | 05-02-2006 11:54 PM | |
| PADI Training vs.. others | Vacation ideas | 3 | 03-07-2006 08:15 AM | |
| PADI Training vs.. others | Gear | 3 | 03-07-2006 08:15 AM | |