30-year Anniversary: Tonkin Gulf Lie Launched Vietnam War

On Oct 12, 1:56 pm, George Cathcart <george.cathc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 12:20 pm, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 10, 10:45 am, George Cathcart <george.cathc...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 9, 11:33 pm, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > 30-year Anniversary: Tonkin Gulf Lie Launched Vietnam War
>
> > > >http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2261
>
> > > Your math is a bit off. Aug. 4, 1964 was more than 40 years ago....
>
> > > gc
>
> > It's the title of an article fuckwit.
>
> It's also the subject matter of your post. You chose that after
> posting an article that is 13 years old. What was the point?
>
> Don't get me wrong, I happen to be one who is appalled by the Tonkin
> lie and everything that followed, but I fail to see the point or
> context of this posting at this time. You might just as well have
> posted something about Custer's stupidity at Little Big Horn.
>
> gc

Your inability to place it the context of current events doesn't
surprise
me one little bit fuckwit.

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:00:19 -0700, RecScubaPoster
<recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Their arithmetic was spot on fuckwit.

Oh, so it's just an old fuckin' article that you posted without
correcting the date / elapsed time on... OK, perhaps their date
calculations don't make them an idiot... Unfortunately, you can't use
that same excuse...

--
"I'd insult you, but you're not bright enough to notice."

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:05:14 -0700, RecScubaPoster
<recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Your inability to place it the context of current events doesn't
> surprise me one little bit fuckwit.

"I'd like to see it from your viewpoint, but I can't get my head that
far up my ass"

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:v0lvg3tqm8mhtub99fhqtgeao7hktdgvdq@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:00:19 -0700, RecScubaPoster
> <recscubaposter@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Their arithmetic was spot on fuckwit.
>
> Oh, so it's just an old fuckin' article that you posted without
> correcting the date / elapsed time on... OK, perhaps their date
> calculations don't make them an idiot... Unfortunately, you can't use
> that same excuse...
>
> --
> "I'd insult you, but you're not bright enough to notice."

I see Carl is back in full bloom.

Still hiding in his momma's basement, afraid of the light of day like the
other cockroaches.

On Oct 12, 4:05 pm, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 1:56 pm, George Cathcart <george.cathc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 12, 12:20 pm, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 10, 10:45 am, George Cathcart <george.cathc...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 9, 11:33 pm, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > 30-year Anniversary: Tonkin Gulf Lie Launched Vietnam War
>
> > > > >http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2261
>
> > > > Your math is a bit off. Aug. 4, 1964 was more than 40 years ago....
>
> > > > gc
>
> > > It's the title of an article fuckwit.
>
> > It's also the subject matter of your post. You chose that after
> > posting an article that is 13 years old. What was the point?
>
> > Don't get me wrong, I happen to be one who is appalled by the Tonkin
> > lie and everything that followed, but I fail to see the point or
> > context of this posting at this time. You might just as well have
> > posted something about Custer's stupidity at Little Big Horn.
>
> > gc
>
> Your inability to place it the context of current events doesn't
> surprise
> me one little bit fuckwit.

Look, genius, you are the one who posted the link to a 13 year old
article, titled your post "30-Year Anniversary" and made no comment
about it. I can see the context very clearly, probably better than you
can. I also happen to be very opposed to the current war. And I'm
embarrassed by anonymous little tourette's patients like you. I guess
you would be the left's version of scott.

gc

"George Cathcart" <george.cathcart@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1192222437.727942.187200@v29g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
> Look, genius, you are the one who posted the link to a 13 year old
> article, titled your post "30-Year Anniversary" and made no comment
> about it. I can see the context very clearly, probably better than you
> can. I also happen to be very opposed to the current war. And I'm
> embarrassed by anonymous little tourette's patients like you. I guess
> you would be the left's version of scott.

Certainly the same vocubulary and temperment.

On Oct 12, 3:10 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-
gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:00:19 -0700, RecScubaPoster
>
> <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Their arithmetic was spot on fuckwit.
>
> Oh, so it's just an old fuckin' article that you posted without
> correcting the date / elapsed time on... OK, perhaps their date
> calculations don't make them an idiot... Unfortunately, you can't use
> that same excuse...
>
> --
> "I'd insult you, but you're not bright enough to notice."

It was the title of the article fuckwit.

On Oct 12, 3:14 pm, Grumman-581 <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-
gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:05:14 -0700, RecScubaPoster
>
> <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Your inability to place it the context of current events doesn't
> > surprise me one little bit fuckwit.
>
> "I'd like to see it from your viewpoint, but I can't get my head that
> far up my ass"

"Youd hafta pull ya head outta ya cunt before you cun stick it
up ya ass. Tha ain't hapnin punk."

On Oct 12, 3:25 pm, "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Grumman-581" <grumman...@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:v0lvg3tqm8mhtub99fhqtgeao7hktdgvdq@4ax.com...
>
> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:00:19 -0700, RecScubaPoster
> > <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Their arithmetic was spot on fuckwit.
>
> > Oh, so it's just an old fuckin' article that you posted without
> > correcting the date / elapsed time on... OK, perhaps their date
> > calculations don't make them an idiot... Unfortunately, you can't use
> > that same excuse...
>
> > --
> > "I'd insult you, but you're not bright enough to notice."
>
> I see Carl is back in full bloom.
>
> Still hiding in his momma's basement, afraid of the light of day like the
> other cockroaches.

When do you arrive in Bagdad bad boy? They have work for badassed
bounty hunters like you. Maybe you could retire and not live off
your puppies...

In article <1192206055.707808.100530@i13g2000prf.googlegroups .com>,
recscubaposter@yahoo.com says...
-On Oct 10, 10:45 am, George Cathcart <george.cathc...@gmail.com>
-wrote:
-> On Oct 9, 11:33 pm, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
->
-> > 30-year Anniversary: Tonkin Gulf Lie Launched Vietnam War
->
-> >http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2261
->
-> Your math is a bit off. Aug. 4, 1964 was more than 40 years ago....
->
-> gc
-
-It's the title of an article fuckwit.

hey yourself, fuckwitless.
the number is still wrong.

your choice of authors shows your standards, or lack thereof.

-

--
Bob Crownfield
crownfield@verizon.net